Cochrane · systematic review · CD012828
Nerve‐sparing radical hysterectomy compared to standard radical hysterectomy for women with early stage cervical cancer (stage Ia2 to IIa)
Kietpeerakool, C, Aue‐aungkul, A, Galaal, K, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2019 · Cochrane Library
Gynaecological, Neuro-oncology and Orphan CancerAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
7
current version
GRADE rated
4
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 3 · 42.9%Very low 1 · 14.3%Low 3 · 42.9%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Comparison
Population: women with stage Ia2 to IIa cervical cancer
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Overall survival | no estimate extracted | 0 studies · 0 participants | Ungraded |
Rate of ISC one month after operation | no estimate extracted | 0 studies · 0 participants | Ungraded |
Time to PVR ≤ 50 mL (days) | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 111 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
PVR one month after operation (mL) | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 86 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Perioperative complications (excluding bladder dysfunction) | RR 0.55 [0.24, 1.26] | 3 studies · 180 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Disease‐free survival (median | HR 0.63 [0, 106.95] | 1 study · 86 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Quality of life | no estimate extracted | 0 studies · 0 participants | Ungraded |