evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,860 questions · 64,864 findings · 4,913 reviews · Headline outcomes only

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 13,869 · 21.4%GRADE not reported 3,491 · 5.4%Very low 16,300 · 25.1%Low 17,338 · 26.7%Moderate 10,900 · 16.8%High 2,966 · 4.6%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

SPLINT vs No active treatment (control)

Overall improvement (improved/not improved or worsened) ‐ short‐term improvement: < 3 months · carpal tunnel syndrome

SPLINT may leads to higher overall improvement (improved/not improved or worsened) ‐ short‐term… compared with NO ACTIVE TREATMENT (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Totally percutaneous vs cut‐down femoral artery access

Short‐term mortality (30‐day or in‐hospital) · people undergoing elective bifurcated abdominal endovascular aneurysm repair

Totally percutaneous showed no clear difference in short‐term mortality (30‐day or in‐hospital) compared with cut‐down femoral artery access (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Totally percutaneous vs cut‐down femoral artery access

Failure of aneurysm exclusion ( · people undergoing elective bifurcated abdominal endovascular aneurysm repair

Totally percutaneous showed no clear difference in failure of aneurysm exclusion( compared with cut‐down femoral artery access (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Totally percutaneous vs cut‐down femoral artery access

Wound infection · people undergoing elective bifurcated abdominal endovascular aneurysm repair

Totally percutaneous showed no clear difference in wound infection (30‐day or in‐hospital) compared with cut‐down femoral artery access (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Totally percutaneous vs cut‐down femoral artery access

Major complications · people undergoing elective bifurcated abdominal endovascular aneurysm repair

Totally percutaneous showed no clear difference in major complications (30‐day or in‐hospital) compared with cut‐down femoral artery access (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Totally percutaneous vs cut‐down femoral artery access

Medium‐ to long‐term complications( · people undergoing elective bifurcated abdominal endovascular aneurysm repair

Totally percutaneous showed no clear difference in medium‐ to long‐term complications( compared with cut‐down femoral artery access (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Totally percutaneous vs cut‐down femoral artery access

Bleeding complications (30‐day or in‐hospital) · people undergoing elective bifurcated abdominal endovascular aneurysm repair

Totally percutaneous showed no clear difference in bleeding complications (30‐day or in‐hospital) compared with cut‐down femoral artery access (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) vs usual care

All‐cause mortality: all ECMO studies · severe cardiorespiratory failure and cardiac arrest

Summary of findings table ‐ Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) probably leads to lower all‐cause mortality: all ECMO studies compared with conventional care (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) vs usual care

All‐cause mortality: VV ECMO subgroup · severe cardiorespiratory failure and cardiac arrest

Summary of findings table ‐ Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) probably leads to lower all‐cause mortality: VV ECMO subgroup compared with conventional care (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) vs usual care

All‐cause mortality: VA ECMO subgroup · severe cardiorespiratory failure and cardiac arrest

Summary of findings table ‐ Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality: VA ECMO subgroup compared with conventional care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) vs usual care

All‐cause mortality at 6 months (subgroup) · severe cardiorespiratory failure and cardiac arrest

Summary of findings table ‐ Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality: ECPR subgroup compared with conventional care (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) vs usual care

Major hemorrhage · severe cardiorespiratory failure and cardiac arrest

Summary of findings table ‐ Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) probably leads to higher major hemorrhage: all available studies compared with conventional care (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) vs usual care

Neurologic injury: all available studies · severe cardiorespiratory failure and cardiac arrest

Summary of findings table ‐ Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) showed no clear difference in neurologic injury: all available studies compared with conventional care (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review