Cochrane · systematic review · CD010381

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for critically ill adults

Burrell, A, Kim, J, Alliegro, P, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2023 · Cochrane Library

Emergency and Critical CareAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
6
current version
GRADE rated
6
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 1 · 16.7%Moderate 5 · 83.3%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Summary of findings table ‐ Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) compared to conventional care for severe cardiorespiratory failure and cardiac arrest

Population: severe cardiorespiratory failure and cardiac arrest
6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
All‐cause mortality: all ECMO studies
Summary of findings table ‐ Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) vs conventional care
RR 0.8 [0.7, 0.92]5 studies · 756 participantsModerate
Downgraded: inconsistency, indirectness
All‐cause mortality: VV ECMO subgroup
Summary of findings table ‐ Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) vs conventional care
RR 0.77 [0.62, 0.96]2 studies · 429 participantsModerate
Downgraded: indirectness
All‐cause mortality: VA ECMO subgroup
Summary of findings table ‐ Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) vs conventional care
RR 0.5 [0.18, 1.41]1 study · 42 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
All‐cause mortality: ECPR subgroup
Summary of findings table ‐ Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) vs conventional care
RR 0.76 [0.52, 1.13]2 studies · 285 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Major hemorrhage: all available studies
Summary of findings table ‐ Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) vs conventional care
RR 3.32 [1.9, 5.82]4 studies · 577 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Neurologic injury: all available studies
Summary of findings table ‐ Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) vs conventional care
RR 2.83 [0.36, 22.42]2 studies · 286 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision