Comfort · Adults with refractive errors
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
3 findings from 1 review
Proportion of participants who discontinued contact lens wear, at 1 week (RR < 1 favored) · Adults with refractive errors
It is very uncertain whether silicone hydrogel changes proportion of participants who discontinued contact lens wear, at 1… compared with hydrogel soft contact lenses (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Corneal staining scores, at 1 week (MD < 0 favored) · Adults with refractive errors
It is very uncertain whether silicone hydrogel changes corneal staining scores, at 1 week (MD < 0 favored) compared with hydrogel soft contact lenses (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Conjunctival staining scores, at 1 month (MD < 0 favored) · Adults with refractive errors
It is very uncertain whether silicone hydrogel changes conjunctival staining scores, at 1 month (MD < 0 favored) compared with hydrogel soft contact lenses (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Proportion of participants with vision‐threatening adverse events (RR < 1 favored) · Adults with refractive errors
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
4 participants
Very low
Intervention not reported
Manifest keratoconus
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Subclinical keratoconus
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Mean change in BCVA from baseline · people with large macular hole
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Mean postoperative BCVA (lower is better) · people with large macular hole
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Very low
Intervention not reported
Overall closure of macular hole at end of · people with large macular hole
The intervention probably leads to higher overall closure of macular hole at end of (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 1.1 [1.02, 1.18]
Studies not reported
Moderate
Intervention not reported
Speed of visual acuity improvement · people with large macular hole
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Type 1 macular hole closure at end of · people with large macular hole
The intervention probably leads to higher type 1 macular hole closure at end of (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 1.31 [1.03, 1.66]
Studies not reported
Moderate
Intervention not reported
Postoperative retinal detachment at end of · people with large macular hole
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Low
Changes in mean participant‐reported ocular pain from baseline to 24 hours · corneal abrasion (post‐trauma or post‐surgical)
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Very low
Proportion of participants with complications at longest time point Up to 1 week · corneal abrasion (post‐surgical)
1 finding from 1 review
Changes in mean participant‐reported ocular pain from baseline to 48 hours · corneal abrasion (post‐trauma or post‐surgical)
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Very low
Changes in mean participant‐reported ocular pain from baseline to 72 hours · corneal abrasion (post‐trauma or post‐surgical)
1 finding from 1 review
Proportion of participants without complete resolution of epithelial defects by 24 to 72 hours · corneal abrasion (post‐trauma or post‐surgical)
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Very low
Proportion of participants with complications at longest time point Up to 2 weeks · corneal abrasion (post‐trauma or post‐surgical)
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Very low
Changes in mean participant‐reported ocular pain from baseline to 24 hours · corneal abrasion (post‐surgical)
1 finding from 1 review