Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

93 questions · 129 findings · 19 reviews · Dental caries

No studies found 9 · 7%GRADE not reported 103 · 79.8%Very low 11 · 8.5%Low 1 · 0.8%Moderate 5 · 3.9%High 0 · 0%

Chemotherapy (any regimen; added to, or compared with, locoregional treatment) vs Locoregional treatment and/or an alternative chemotherapy regimen

Quality of life · People receiving curative-intent treatment for oral cavity and oropharyngeal (squamous cell) cancer

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Flossing plus toothbrushing (self-performed; manual or automated floss) vs Toothbrushing alone

Quality of life · Dentate adults aged 16 years or older (excluding orthodontic patients and those with severe periodontal disease)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Radiotherapy (morning) vs Afternoon radiotherapy

Quality of life · People with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (ICD-O C01-C06) or oropharynx (ICD-O C09-C10); head and neck cancer trials…
1 finding from 1 review

Dental (tooth) agenesis vs No dental agenesis

Oral health-related quality of life · Adolescents (10-19 years)

The umbrella review reported insufficient scientific evidence to support an association between dental agenesis and oral health-related quality of life.

2 findings from 1 review

Oral-health promotion programs (OHPPs): community-based oral-health education/training, supervised toothbrushing with fluoride toothpaste and topical fluoride, dental screening, and dietary advice vs No oral health promotion program

Oral health-related quality of life · Adolescents (10-19 years)

Oral health promotion programs have a positive effect on OHRQoL in adolescents (narrative synthesis; low methodological quality of included evidence; no pooled estimate or GRADE rating).

2 findings from 1 review

Older age vs Younger adults (population mean age <=33.4 years)

Oral health-related quality of life · Adolescents (10-19 years)

The abstract reports older age is associated with worse OHRQoL, but the body notes the evidence on age is limited and conflicting (narrative synthesis; no pooled estimate or GRADE rating).

2 findings from 1 review

Female sex vs Male sex

Oral health-related quality of life · Adolescents (10-19 years)

The abstract reports female sex is associated with worse OHRQoL, but the conclusion states the impact of gender was not clarified (narrative synthesis; no pooled estimate or GRADE rating).

2 findings from 1 review

Bruxism vs No bruxism

Oral health-related quality of life · Adolescents (10-19 years)

Bruxism was not shown to impact OHRQoL in adolescents (narrative synthesis; no pooled estimate or GRADE rating).

2 findings from 1 review

Dental erosion vs No dental erosion

Oral health-related quality of life · Adolescents (10-19 years)

The umbrella review reported that dental erosion has not been shown to affect oral health-related quality of life.

2 findings from 1 review

Favorable socioeconomic and family environment vs Less favorable socioeconomic and family environment

Oral health-related quality of life · Adolescents (10-19 years)

The umbrella review reported better oral health-related quality of life with favorable housing, parental education, income, family environment, and access to dental care.

1 finding from 1 review

Temporomandibular disorder vs No temporomandibular disorder

Oral health-related quality of life · Adolescents (10-19 years)

Temporomandibular disorder is associated with worse OHRQoL in adolescents (narrative synthesis; no pooled estimate or GRADE rating).

2 findings from 1 review