Question · asked by 1 review
Completed orthodontic treatment vs No previous or incomplete orthodontic treatment: Oral health-related quality of life
- Population
- Adolescents (10-19 years)
- Intervention
- Completed orthodontic treatment
- Comparison
- No previous or incomplete orthodontic treatment
- Outcome
- Oral health-related quality of life
The umbrella review reported better oral health-related quality of life after completed orthodontic treatment.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Completed orthodontic treatment vs No previous or incomplete orthodontic treatment Oral health-related quality of life · Adolescents aged 10-19 years The umbrella review reported better oral health-related quality of life after completed orthodontic treatment. Oral-health-related quality of life in adolescents: umbrella review. (2023) All outcomes | no estimate extracted | Not reported | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oral-health-related quality of life in adolescents: umbrella review. 2023 All outcomes | January 2022 | 22 | Not applicable |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Completed orthodontic treatment vs Untreated / never received orthodontic treatment · Adolescents (10-19 years) · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.