What do systematic reviews say?

Montelukast vs Conventional treatment

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Leukotriene receptor antagonists for eczema 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Montelukast vs placebo

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Leukotriene receptor antagonists for eczema 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Intervention vs no intervention or control intervention (control)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Pharmacological interventions for acute hepatitis C infection 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Laparoscopic retroperitoneal adrenalectomy vs laparoscopic transperitoneal adrenalectomy

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy for adrenal tumours in adults 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Gemcitabine plus cisplatin vs S‐1 plus cisplatin

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Gemcitabine‐based chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract carcinomas 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Gemcitabine plus S‐1 vs S‐1

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Gemcitabine‐based chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract carcinomas 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin vs best supportive care

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Gemcitabine‐based chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract carcinomas 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Gemcitabine plus vandetanib vs vandetanib

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Gemcitabine‐based chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract carcinomas 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin vs 5‐fluorouracil plus folinic acid

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Gemcitabine‐based chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract carcinomas 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin vs 5‐fluorouracil plus cisplatin plus radiotherapy

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Gemcitabine‐based chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract carcinomas 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Gemcitabine plus mitomycin C vs capecitabine plus mitomycin C

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Gemcitabine‐based chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract carcinomas 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Gemcitabine vs vandetanib

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Gemcitabine‐based chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract carcinomas 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Vitamin E vs placebo

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Vitamin and mineral supplementation for preventing dementia or delaying cognitive decline in people with mild… 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Vitamin E + vitamin C vs placebo

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Vitamin and mineral supplementation for preventing dementia or delaying cognitive decline in people with mild… 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Multifactorial interventions vs exercise

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Multifactorial and multiple component interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Multi‐component intervention vs usual care or attention control

• Multifactorial and multiple component interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  4 studies · 391 participants
  Low

Multi‐component intervention vs exercise

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Multifactorial and multiple component interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Multifactorial interventions vs usual care or attention control

• Multifactorial and multiple component interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  9 studies · 2373 participants
  Low

Exercise‐based cardiac rehabilitation vs usual care

• Exercise‐based cardiac rehabilitation for people with implantable ventricular assist devices 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 37 participants
  Very low

Macrolides vs no intervention

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Macrolide antibiotics for bronchiectasis 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found