Specific adverse events: serious haemorrhage · women with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer
Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy may leads to higher specific adverse events: serious haemorrhage compared with chemotherapy (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events, i.e. serious enough to require withdrawal of the treatment · children and adults with SMA type 3
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Number of serious adverse events ‐ pulmonary · treating infections in people with neutropenia or neutrophil dysfunction
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes number of serious adverse events ‐ pulmonary (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Serious adverse events (including mortality) · adults or children with asthma
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events of any severity or seriousness · children with respiratory syncytial virus infection
Summary of findings table ‐ Immunoglobulins showed no clear difference in adverse events of any severity or seriousness compared with placebo (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events between 0 and 16 weeks · predominantly knee osteoarthritis
Antidepressant showed no clear difference in serious adverse events between 0 and 16 weeks compared with placebo (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Number of participants experiencing any serious adverse events · Children with obstructive sleep apnoea (aged 15 years or younger)
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Serious adverse events: cardiovascular events · dialysis vascular access outcomes in AVG patients with ESKD
It is very uncertain whether omega‐3 fatty acids changes serious adverse events: cardiovascular events compared with placebo (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events: cardiovascular events · Dialysis vascular access outcomes in AVF patients with ESKD
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Serious adverse events assessed using ICH‐GCP · people with cirrhosis who had minimal or overt hepatic encephalopathy or who were at risk for developing hepatic encephalopathy;…
It is very uncertain whether L‐ornithine L‐aspartate changes serious adverse events assessed using ICH‐GCP compared with probiotic (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events assessed using ICH‐GCP · people with cirrhosis who had minimal or overt hepatic encephalopathy or who were at risk for developing hepatic encephalopathy;…
It is very uncertain whether L‐ornithine L‐aspartate changes serious adverse events assessed using ICH‐GCP compared with rifaximin (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events assessed using ICH‐GCP
It is very uncertain whether L‐ornithine L aspartate changes serious adverse events assessed using ICH‐GCP compared with placebo or no intervention (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events assessed using ICH‐GCP · people with cirrhosis who had minimal or overt hepatic encephalopathy or who were at risk for developing hepatic encephalopathy;…
It is very uncertain whether L‐ornithine L‐aspartate changes serious adverse events assessed using ICH‐GCP compared with lactulose (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Total serious adverse events Systolic targets · Diabetes Mellitus with elevated blood pressure
The intervention showed no clear difference in total serious adverse events Systolic targets (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Non‐serious adverse events (range 2–10 months) · adult patients after liver transplantation.
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Serious adverse events during the trial period · all trials contributing results to the summary of findings table included people with mild disease (WHO scale 1 to 3)§
The intervention showed no clear difference in serious adverse events during the trial period (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Serious adverse events during the trial period · people with moderate to severe disease (WHO scale 4–9); all trials contributing results to the summary of findings table investigated…
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes serious adverse events during the trial period (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events during the study period · all trials contributing results to the summary of findings table included people with mild disease (WHO scale 1 to 3)§
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events during the study period · people with moderate to severe disease (WHO scale 4–9); all studies contributing results to the summary of findings table included people…
Azithromycin showed no clear difference in serious adverse events during the study period compared with placebo or standard of care alone (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Number of participants experiencing any serious adverse events · Children with obstructive sleep apnoea (aged 15 years or younger)
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found