Vitamin D vs no treatment/placebo (no vitamin or minerals): Pre‐eclampsia
- Population
- women during pregnancy
- Intervention
- Vitamin D
- Comparison
- no treatment/placebo (no vitamin or minerals)
- Outcome
- Pre‐eclampsia
Vitamin D alone showed no clear difference in pre‐eclampsia (ALL) compared with no treatment/placebo (no vitamins or minerals) (low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Vitamin D alone vs no treatment/placebo (no vitamins or minerals) Pre‐eclampsia (ALL) · women during pregnancy Vitamin D alone showed no clear difference in pre‐eclampsia (ALL) compared with no treatment/placebo (no vitamins or minerals) (low certainty). Vitamin D supplementation for women during pregnancy (2016) · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyearlier version CD008873.PUB3, superseded | RR 0.52 [0.25, 1.05] | 2 studies · 219 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D supplementation for women during pregnancy 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Vitamin D vs placebo or no intervention · pregnant women and their infants.. · 1 review
- Vitamin D vs no treatment/placebo (no vitamin or minerals) · pregnant women · 0 reviews
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.