Fish oil lipid emulsion (LE) vs non‐fish oil LE: Parenteral nutrition‐associated liver disease/cholestasis
Fish oil LE showed no clear difference in PNALD/cholestasis (any definition) compared with non‐fish oil LE (low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Fish oil LE vs non‐fish oil LE PNALD/cholestasis (any definition) · parenterally fed term and late preterm infants with surgical conditions Fish oil LE showed no clear difference in PNALD/cholestasis (any definition) compared with non‐fish oil LE (low certainty). Lipid emulsions for parenterally fed term and late preterm infants (2019) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1.2 [0.38, 3.76] | 2 studies · 68 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lipid emulsions for parenterally fed term and late preterm infants 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.