Question · asked by 1 review
Co‐bedding vs separate care: Episodes in co‐regulated state (out of 20 observations) Episodes observed (out of a total of 20 observations) Scale from 0 to 20
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Co‐bedding vs separate care Episodes in co‐regulated state (out of 20 observations) Episodes observed (out of a total of 20 observations) Scale from 0 to 20 · stable preterm twins with growth and neurodevelopment promoted Co‐bedding in neonatal nursery for promoting growth and neurodevelopment in stable preterm twins (2016) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 6 participants | Very low |
Co‐bedding vs separate care Episodes in coregulated state (out of 20 observations) Episodes observed (out of a total of 20 observations). Scale from: 0 to 20. · patients with promoting growth and neurodevelopment in stable preterm twins Co‐bedding in neonatal nursery for promoting growth and neurodevelopment in stable preterm twins (2012) · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyearlier version CD008313.PUB2, superseded | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 6 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Co‐bedding in neonatal nursery for promoting growth and neurodevelopment in stable preterm twins 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.