Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

7 questions · 7 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 3 · 42.9%Low 3 · 42.9%Moderate 1 · 14.3%High 0 · 0%

Co‐bedding vs separate care

Rate of weight gain (g/kg/day) · patients with promoting growth and neurodevelopment in stable preterm twins

1 finding from 1 review

Co‐bedding in neonatal nursery for promoting growth and neurodevelopment in stable preterm twins 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 18 participants
Low

Co‐bedding vs separate care

Apnea, bradycardia, or desaturation Number of twins with episodes · patients with promoting growth and neurodevelopment in stable preterm twins

Co‐bedding showed no clear difference in apnea, bradycardia, or desaturation Number of twins with episodes compared with separate care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Co‐bedding in neonatal nursery for promoting growth and neurodevelopment in stable preterm twins 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.85 [0.18, 4.05]
1 study · 124 participants
Low

Episodes in co‐regulated state (out of 20 observations) Episodes observed (out of a total of 20 observations) Scale from 0 to 20 · patients with promoting growth and neurodevelopment in stable preterm twins

1 finding from 1 review

Co‐bedding in neonatal nursery for promoting growth and neurodevelopment in stable preterm twins 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 6 participants
Very low

Co‐bedding vs separate care

Infections ‐ Suspected or proven infections (any) Clinical and microbiological methods · patients with promoting growth and neurodevelopment in stable preterm twins

It is very uncertain whether co‐bedding changes infections ‐ suspected or proven infections (any) Clinical and… compared with separate care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Co‐bedding in neonatal nursery for promoting growth and neurodevelopment in stable preterm twins 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.84 [0.3, 2.31]
3 studies · 65 participants
Very low

Co‐bedding vs separate care

Length of hospital stay · patients with promoting growth and neurodevelopment in stable preterm twins

1 finding from 1 review

Co‐bedding in neonatal nursery for promoting growth and neurodevelopment in stable preterm twins 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 6 participants
Very low

Co‐bedding vs separate care

Parental satisfaction · patients with promoting growth and neurodevelopment in stable preterm twins

1 finding from 1 review

Co‐bedding in neonatal nursery for promoting growth and neurodevelopment in stable preterm twins 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 18 participants
Moderate

Co‐bedding vs separate care

Pain (PIPP) · patients with promoting growth and neurodevelopment in stable preterm twins

1 finding from 1 review

Co‐bedding in neonatal nursery for promoting growth and neurodevelopment in stable preterm twins 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 224 participants
Low