Health expenditure per capita vs Not applicable: Oral health-related quality of life
No statistically significant difference in OHRQoL was reported by health expenditure per capita.
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Health expenditure per capita vs Not applicable OHRQoL sum score transformed to 0-100 · Community-dwelling adults aged 60 years or older · Baseline for longitudinal studies, Community No statistically significant difference in OHRQoL was reported by health expenditure per capita. Association between oral health-related quality of life and structural determinants of health among elderly… (2025) All outcomes | There was no statistically significant difference in OHRQoL based on per capita expenditure on health care. | Not reported | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Association between oral health-related quality of life and structural determinants of health among elderly populations. a systematic… 2025 All outcomes | 23 August 2024 (records from January 2014 onward) | 6 | Not applicable |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.