Non-Cochrane · aetiology · PM40597152

Association between oral health-related quality of life and structural determinants of health among elderly populations. a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Borg-Bartolo Roberta, Roccuzzo Andrea, Gambetta-Tessini Karla, et al. · International journal for equity in health · 2025 · PubMed · doi:10.1186/s12939-025-02557-5

Oral HealthDental cariesAMSTAR 2: not applicable
Full textEvery question was extracted from the full text, figures and supplements by two independent LLM extractors, disagreements adjudicated. Rows cite where in the review the value comes from.
Questions
24
current version
GRADE rated
0
No studies
0
Included studies
6
linked below
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 24 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationParticipants aged ≥60 years living in the community (60-year cut-off per United Nations)Community-dwelling adults aged ≥60 years across 25 countries (n=45 studies)
InterventionStructural determinants of health (country-level income, Gini index, unemployment rate, HDI, out-of-pocket health expenditure, health expenditure per capita) and dental status (dental caries, periodontal disease, edentulism prevalence) as exposuresNine determinants meta-analyzed: country-level income, Gini index, unemployment rate, HDI, out-of-pocket expenditure, per-capita health expenditure, and dental caries, periodontal disease and edentulism prevalence
ComparisonNot applicable (PECO framework; no comparator group)Not applicable (subgroup categories within each determinant compared)
OutcomesOHRQoL measured by OHIP, GOHAI or OIDPOHRQoL sum score transformed to 0-100 (GOHAI n=21, OHIP-14 n=19, OHIP-7 n=1, OIDP n=2 studies)
Study designsObservational studies: cross-sectional, longitudinal, and national oral health surveys45 observational studies (39 cross-sectional, 6 longitudinal)
TimingCross-sectional associations (baseline OHRQoL for longitudinal studies); studies published 2014 onwardCross-sectional / baseline OHRQoL

Search date: 23 August 2024 (records from January 2014 onward). Databases: Embase; MEDLINE (via PubMed); Scopus; OpenGrey (grey literature) plus hand searching

Questions and results

Country-level income (World Bank income classification) vs Higher- vs lower-income country categories

Population: Community-dwelling elderly persons aged ≥60 years
2 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL sum score, transformed 0-100)
High-middle to high income
Community-dwelling older adults in higher-income countries had better OHRQoL than those in lower-income countries (77.9, 95% CI 70.2 to 85.6 vs 66.9, 95% CI 56.7 to 77.0); the difference by income was statistically significant (ungraded).
Source: Abstract; Results, 'Structural determinants of health' para 1; Fig. 2a · same question in other reviews
MEAN 77.9 [70.2, 85.6]NRUngraded
Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL sum score, transformed 0-100)
Low-middle income
Community-dwelling older adults in higher-income countries had better OHRQoL than those in lower-income countries (77.9, 95% CI 70.2 to 85.6 vs 66.9, 95% CI 56.7 to 77.0); the difference by income was statistically significant (ungraded).
Source: Results, 'Structural determinants of health' para 1; Fig. 2a · same question in other reviews
MEAN 66.9 [56.7, 77.0]NRUngraded

Country-level income inequality (Gini index) vs Lower vs higher income inequality categories

Population: Community-dwelling elderly persons aged ≥60 years
4 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL sum score, transformed 0-100)
Relative equality (Gini index 0.21 to 0.30)
Older adults in countries with relative income equality (low Gini index) had markedly higher OHRQoL (91.3, 95% CI 90.0 to 92.6) than those in less equal countries; the difference by Gini index was statistically significant (ungraded).
Source: Results, 'Structural determinants of health' para 1; Fig. 2b · same question in other reviews
MEAN 91.3 [90.0, 92.6]NRUngraded
Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL sum score, transformed 0-100)
High inequality
Older adults in countries with relative income equality (low Gini index) had markedly higher OHRQoL (91.3, 95% CI 90.0 to 92.6) than those in less equal countries; the difference by Gini index was statistically significant (ungraded).
Source: Results, 'Structural determinants of health' para 1; Fig. 2b · same question in other reviews
MEAN 75.3 [67.1, 83.6]NRUngraded
Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL sum score, transformed 0-100)
Adequate equality
Older adults in countries with relative income equality (low Gini index) had markedly higher OHRQoL (91.3, 95% CI 90.0 to 92.6) than those in less equal countries; the difference by Gini index was statistically significant (ungraded).
Source: Results, 'Structural determinants of health' para 1; Fig. 2b · same question in other reviews
MEAN 75.4 [70.1, 82.7]NRUngraded
Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL sum score, transformed 0-100)
Severe inequality
Older adults in countries with relative income equality (low Gini index) had markedly higher OHRQoL (91.3, 95% CI 90.0 to 92.6) than those in less equal countries; the difference by Gini index was statistically significant (ungraded).
Source: Results, 'Structural determinants of health' para 1; Fig. 2b · same question in other reviews
MEAN 81.2 [75.3, 88.3]NRUngraded

Country-level unemployment rate vs Higher vs lower unemployment-rate categories

Population: Community-dwelling elderly persons aged ≥60 years
1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL sum score, transformed 0-100)
Across unemployment-rate categories
OHRQoL did not differ significantly across country-level unemployment-rate categories; no pooled estimate was reported in the text (ungraded).
Source: Results, 'Structural determinants of health' para 1; Fig. 2c · same question in other reviews
No statistically significant difference in OHRQoL based on unemployment rate (Fig. 2c).NRUngraded

Human Development Index (HDI) vs Higher vs lower HDI categories

Population: Community-dwelling elderly persons aged ≥60 years
3 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL sum score, transformed 0-100)
High HDI
Older adults in higher-HDI countries had better OHRQoL (high 79.9, 95% CI 74.4 to 85.5; very high 78.4, 95% CI 71.1 to 85.8) than those in medium-HDI countries (63.5, 95% CI 54.3 to 72.7); the difference by HDI was statistically significant (ungraded).
Source: Results, 'Structural determinants of health' para 1; Fig. 2d · same question in other reviews
MEAN 79.9 [74.4, 85.5]NRUngraded
Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL sum score, transformed 0-100)
Medium HDI
Older adults in higher-HDI countries had better OHRQoL (high 79.9, 95% CI 74.4 to 85.5; very high 78.4, 95% CI 71.1 to 85.8) than those in medium-HDI countries (63.5, 95% CI 54.3 to 72.7); the difference by HDI was statistically significant (ungraded).
Source: Results, 'Structural determinants of health' para 1; Fig. 2d · same question in other reviews
MEAN 63.5 [54.3, 72.7]NRUngraded
Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL sum score, transformed 0-100)
Very high HDI
Older adults in higher-HDI countries had better OHRQoL (high 79.9, 95% CI 74.4 to 85.5; very high 78.4, 95% CI 71.1 to 85.8) than those in medium-HDI countries (63.5, 95% CI 54.3 to 72.7); the difference by HDI was statistically significant (ungraded).
Source: Results, 'Structural determinants of health' para 1; Fig. 2d · same question in other reviews
MEAN 78.4 [71.1, 85.8]NRUngraded

Out-of-pocket health expenditure vs Lower vs higher out-of-pocket expenditure categories

Population: Community-dwelling elderly persons aged ≥60 years
2 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL sum score, transformed 0-100)
Highest out-of-pocket expenditure
Lower out-of-pocket health expenditure was associated with better OHRQoL (83.9, 95% CI 75.2 to 92.6 vs 67.5, 95% CI 58.5 to 76.5); the difference was statistically significant (ungraded).
Source: Abstract; Results, 'Structural determinants of health' para 1; Fig. 3a · same question in other reviews
MEAN 67.5 [58.5, 76.5]NRUngraded
Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL sum score, transformed 0-100)
Lowest out-of-pocket expenditure
Lower out-of-pocket health expenditure was associated with better OHRQoL (83.9, 95% CI 75.2 to 92.6 vs 67.5, 95% CI 58.5 to 76.5); the difference was statistically significant (ungraded).
Source: Abstract; Results, 'Structural determinants of health' para 1; Fig. 3a · same question in other reviews
MEAN 83.9 [75.2, 92.6]NRUngraded

Health expenditure per capita vs Higher vs lower per-capita health expenditure categories

Population: Community-dwelling elderly persons aged ≥60 years
1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL sum score, transformed 0-100)
Across per-capita health expenditure categories
OHRQoL did not differ significantly across per-capita health-expenditure categories; no pooled estimate was reported in the text (ungraded).
Source: Results, 'Structural determinants of health' para 1; Fig. 3a · same question in other reviews
No statistically significant difference in OHRQoL based on per-capita health expenditure (Fig. 3a).NRUngraded

Country-level dental caries prevalence (Global Burden of Disease) vs Low vs high dental caries prevalence

Population: Community-dwelling elderly persons aged ≥60 years
1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL sum score, transformed 0-100)
Low dental caries prevalence
Lower country-level dental caries prevalence was associated with better OHRQoL (low-prevalence pooled mean 81.5, 95% CI 76.5 to 86.6, higher than high-prevalence countries); statistically significant (ungraded).
Source: Abstract; Results, 'Dental status' para 1; Fig. 4a · same question in other reviews
MEAN 81.5 [76.5, 86.6]NRUngraded

Country-level periodontal disease prevalence (Global Burden of Disease) vs Low vs high periodontal disease prevalence

Population: Community-dwelling elderly persons aged ≥60 years
1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL sum score, transformed 0-100)
Across periodontal disease prevalence categories
OHRQoL did not differ significantly by country-level periodontal disease prevalence; no pooled estimate was reported in the text (ungraded).
Source: Results, 'Dental status' para 1; Fig. 4b · same question in other reviews
No statistically significant difference in OHRQoL based on periodontal disease prevalence (Fig. 4b).NRUngraded

Country-level edentulism prevalence (Global Burden of Disease) vs Low vs high edentulism prevalence

Population: Community-dwelling elderly persons aged ≥60 years
1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL sum score, transformed 0-100)
Across edentulism prevalence categories
OHRQoL did not differ significantly by country-level edentulism prevalence; no pooled estimate was reported in the text (ungraded).
Source: Results, 'Dental status' para 1; Fig. 4c · same question in other reviews
No statistically significant difference in OHRQoL based on edentulism prevalence (Fig. 4c).NRUngraded

High dental-caries prevalence vs Not applicable

Population: Community-dwelling adults aged 60 years or older
1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
OHRQoL sum score transformed to 0-100
Baseline for longitudinal studies · High dental-caries prevalence
The review reported higher OHRQoL in the low than high dental-caries-prevalence category.
Source: Results, Fig. 4a · same question in other reviews
71.40 [64.16, 78.63]NRUngraded

Unemployment rate vs Not applicable

Population: Community-dwelling adults aged 60 years or older
1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
OHRQoL sum score transformed to 0-100
Baseline for longitudinal studies
No statistically significant difference in OHRQoL was reported by unemployment rate.
Source: Results, Fig. 2c · same question in other reviews
There was no statistically significant difference in OHRQoL based on unemployment rate.NRUngraded

Health expenditure per capita vs Not applicable

Population: Community-dwelling adults aged 60 years or older
1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
OHRQoL sum score transformed to 0-100
Baseline for longitudinal studies
No statistically significant difference in OHRQoL was reported by health expenditure per capita.
Source: Results, Fig. 3a · same question in other reviews
There was no statistically significant difference in OHRQoL based on per capita expenditure on health care.NRUngraded

Low edentulism prevalence vs Not applicable

Population: Community-dwelling adults aged 60 years or older
1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
OHRQoL sum score transformed to 0-100
Baseline for longitudinal studies · Low edentulism prevalence
No statistically significant difference in OHRQoL was reported by edentulism prevalence.
Source: Results, Dental status; Fig. 4c · same question in other reviews
There were no statistically significant differences reported in the OHRQoL sum scores based on prevalence of edentulism.NRUngraded

High edentulism prevalence vs Not applicable

Population: Community-dwelling adults aged 60 years or older
1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
OHRQoL sum score transformed to 0-100
Baseline for longitudinal studies · High edentulism prevalence
No statistically significant difference in OHRQoL was reported by edentulism prevalence.
Source: Results, Dental status; Fig. 4c · same question in other reviews
There were no statistically significant differences reported in the OHRQoL sum scores based on prevalence of edentulism.NRUngraded

Low periodontal-disease prevalence vs Not applicable

Population: Community-dwelling adults aged 60 years or older
1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
OHRQoL sum score transformed to 0-100
Baseline for longitudinal studies · Low periodontal-disease prevalence
No statistically significant difference in OHRQoL was reported by periodontal-disease prevalence.
Source: Results, Dental status; Fig. 4b · same question in other reviews
There were no statistically significant differences reported in the OHRQoL sum scores based on periodontal disease prevalence.NRUngraded

High periodontal-disease prevalence vs Not applicable

Population: Community-dwelling adults aged 60 years or older
1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
OHRQoL sum score transformed to 0-100
Baseline for longitudinal studies · High periodontal-disease prevalence
No statistically significant difference in OHRQoL was reported by periodontal-disease prevalence.
Source: Results, Dental status; Fig. 4b · same question in other reviews
There were no statistically significant differences reported in the OHRQoL sum scores based on periodontal disease prevalence.NRUngraded

Comparison

1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL sum score, transformed 0-100)
Overall (pooled across all studies)
MEAN 77.045 studiesUngraded

Included primary studies 6

Open as a trial list
StudyAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial PICOResults
AlBaker 2017
Oral Health Status and Oral Health-related Quality of Life among Hospitalized and Nonhospitalized Geriatric Patients
DOI:10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2022
this review onlynot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Chimi Chimi 2021
Implications of Climate Change on Agricultural Productivity: A Review
DOI:10.47363/jftns/2021(3)130
this review onlynot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Masood 2017
The relationship between oral health and oral health related quality of life among elderly people in United Kingdom
DOI:10.1016/j.jdent.2016.11.002
this review onlynot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Nanri 2017
Frequency of Fruit and Vegetable Consumption and the Oral Health-Related Quality of Life among Japanese Elderly: A Cross-Sectional Study…
PMID:29244736
this review onlynot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Suphinwong 2022
matched by author and year (probable)
this review onlynot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Tsakos 2017
Explaining time changes in oral health-related quality of life in England: a decomposition analysis
DOI:10.1136/jech-2017-209696
this review onlynot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet