Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence): Early childhood caries (ECC)
- Population
- Children younger than 71 months (under 6 years)
- Intervention
- Not applicable (single-group prevalence)
- Comparison
- Not applicable (single-group prevalence)
- Outcome
- Early childhood caries (ECC)
Pooled ECC prevalence in Europe was 36% (95% CI 25-47).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence) Early childhood caries (ECC) prevalence (%, dmft>0) · Children younger than 71 months (under 6 years) · Europe, Region: Europe Pooled ECC prevalence in Europe was 36% (95% CI 25-47). A systematic review and meta-analysis on early-childhood-caries global data. (2024) All outcomes | Prevalence 36 [25, 47] | 13 studies | GRADE not reported |
Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence) Early childhood caries (ECC) prevalence (%, dmft>0) · Children younger than 71 months (under 6 years) · Countries with 71-75 years life expectancy, Life expectancy: 71-75 years ECC prevalence was highest (62%) in countries with 71-75 years life expectancy. A systematic review and meta-analysis on early-childhood-caries global data. (2024) All outcomes | Prevalence 62 | Not reported | GRADE not reported |
Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence) Early childhood caries (ECC) prevalence (%, dmft>0) · Children younger than 71 months (under 6 years) · GNI >$40000, GNI >$40000 ECC prevalence in countries with GNI >$40000 was 47% (95% CI 32-62). A systematic review and meta-analysis on early-childhood-caries global data. (2024) All outcomes | Prevalence 47 [32, 62] | 14 studies | GRADE not reported |
Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence) Early childhood caries (ECC) prevalence (%, dmft>0) · Children younger than 71 months (under 6 years) · Countries with no income inequality (Gini), Gini index: no inequality ECC prevalence was highest (62%) in no-inequality countries by Gini index. A systematic review and meta-analysis on early-childhood-caries global data. (2024) All outcomes | Prevalence 62 | Not reported | GRADE not reported |
Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence) Early childhood caries (ECC) prevalence (%, dmft>0) · Children younger than 71 months (under 6 years) · Africa, Region: Africa Pooled ECC prevalence in Africa was 42% (95% CI 32-53). A systematic review and meta-analysis on early-childhood-caries global data. (2024) All outcomes | Prevalence 42 [32, 53] | 3 studies | GRADE not reported |
Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence) Early childhood caries (ECC) prevalence (%, dmft>0) · Children younger than 71 months (under 6 years) · Asia-Oceania, Region: Asia-Oceania Pooled ECC prevalence in Asia-Oceania was 52% (95% CI 45-60). A systematic review and meta-analysis on early-childhood-caries global data. (2024) All outcomes | Prevalence 52 [45, 60] | 33 studies | GRADE not reported |
Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence) Early childhood caries (ECC) prevalence (%, dmft>0) · Children younger than 71 months (under 6 years) · 49 countries worldwide; urban and rural communities, Overall (all regions) The global pooled prevalence of early childhood caries was 49% (95% CI 44-55), with very high heterogeneity (I2=99.6%). A systematic review and meta-analysis on early-childhood-caries global data. (2024) All outcomes | Prevalence 49 [44, 55] | 67 studies | GRADE not reported |
Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence) Early childhood caries (ECC) prevalence (%, dmft>0) · Children younger than 71 months (under 6 years) · GNI $10000-$19999, GNI $10000-$19999 ECC prevalence in countries with GNI $10000-$19999 was 55% (95% CI 42-68). A systematic review and meta-analysis on early-childhood-caries global data. (2024) All outcomes | Prevalence 55 [42, 68] | 9 studies | GRADE not reported |
Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence) Early childhood caries (ECC) prevalence (%, dmft>0) · Children younger than 71 months (under 6 years) · Countries with low income inequality (Gini), Gini index: low inequality ECC prevalence was lowest (39%) in low-inequality countries by Gini index. A systematic review and meta-analysis on early-childhood-caries global data. (2024) All outcomes | Prevalence 39 | Not reported | GRADE not reported |
Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence) Early childhood caries (ECC) prevalence (%, dmft>0) · Children younger than 71 months (under 6 years) · Countries with highest life expectancy, Life expectancy: highest (>80 years) ECC prevalence was lowest (28%) in countries with the highest life expectancy. A systematic review and meta-analysis on early-childhood-caries global data. (2024) All outcomes | Prevalence 28 | Not reported | GRADE not reported |
Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence) Early childhood caries (ECC) prevalence (%, dmft>0) · Children younger than 71 months (under 6 years) · GNI $5000-$9999, GNI $5000-$9999 ECC prevalence in countries with GNI $5000-$9999 was 53% (95% CI 41-65). A systematic review and meta-analysis on early-childhood-caries global data. (2024) All outcomes | Prevalence 53 [41, 65] | 14 studies | GRADE not reported |
Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence) Early childhood caries (ECC) prevalence (%, dmft>0) · Children younger than 71 months (under 6 years) · Middle East, Region: Middle East Pooled ECC prevalence in Middle East was 72% (95% CI 58-85). A systematic review and meta-analysis on early-childhood-caries global data. (2024) All outcomes | Prevalence 72 [58, 85] | 7 studies | GRADE not reported |
Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence) Early childhood caries (ECC) prevalence (%, dmft>0) · Children younger than 71 months (under 6 years) · North America, Region: North America Pooled ECC prevalence in North America was 57% (95% CI 36-77). A systematic review and meta-analysis on early-childhood-caries global data. (2024) All outcomes | Prevalence 57 [36, 77] | 5 studies | GRADE not reported |
Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence) Early childhood caries (ECC) prevalence (%, dmft>0) · Children younger than 71 months (under 6 years) · Central/South America, Region: Central/South America Pooled ECC prevalence in Central/South America was 34% (95% CI 20-48). A systematic review and meta-analysis on early-childhood-caries global data. (2024) All outcomes | Prevalence 34 [20, 48] | 6 studies | GRADE not reported |
Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence) Early childhood caries (ECC) prevalence (%, dmft>0) · Children younger than 71 months (under 6 years) · GNI $20000-$39999, GNI $20000-$39999 ECC prevalence in countries with GNI $20000-$39999 was 30% (95% CI 22-38). A systematic review and meta-analysis on early-childhood-caries global data. (2024) All outcomes | Prevalence 30 [22, 38] | 11 studies | GRADE not reported |
Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence) Early childhood caries (ECC) prevalence (%, dmft>0) · Children younger than 71 months (under 6 years) · GNI <$5000, GNI <$5000 ECC prevalence in countries with GNI <$5000 was 57% (95% CI 47-67). A systematic review and meta-analysis on early-childhood-caries global data. (2024) All outcomes | Prevalence 57 [47, 67] | 19 studies | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| A systematic review and meta-analysis on early-childhood-caries global data. 2024 All outcomes | 10 October 2022 | 141 | Not applicable |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence) · Children aged 0-5 years in North Africa · 1 review
Studies behind the findings
The primary studies the full-text reviews tie to this outcome. Reviews with headline outcomes only do not list them here.
- Abbasoglu et al. 2015 · included by 1 of these review
- Acuna et al. 2019 · included by 1 of these review
- Alkhtib 2016 · included by 1 of these review
- Angelopoulou et al. 2019 · included by 1 of these review
- Antunes et al. 2018 · included by 1 of these review
- Azrak et al. 2017 · included by 1 of these review
- Baggio et al. 2015 · included by 1 of these review
- Bagherian 2013 · included by 1 of these review
- Barjatya et al. 2020 · included by 1 of these review
- Boka et al. 2013 · included by 1 of these review
- Bourgeois et al. 2014 · included by 1 of these review
- Congiu et al. 2014 · included by 1 of these review
- Divaris et al. 2020 · included by 1 of these review
- Duangthip et al. 2020 · included by 1 of these review
- Elelmi et al. 2021 · included by 1 of these review
- Ferraz et al. 2014 · included by 1 of these review
- Gibbs et al. 2016 · included by 1 of these review
- Gopal 2016 · included by 1 of these review
- Huong et al. 2017 · included by 1 of these review
- Hysi et al. 2017 · included by 1 of these review
- Igic 2018 · included by 1 of these review
- Jain et al. 2018 · included by 1 of these review
- Jiang 2017 · included by 1 of these review
- Kakanur et al. 2017 · included by 1 of these review
- Kowash et al. 2015 · included by 1 of these review
- Kubota et al. 2020 · included by 1 of these review
- Leelataweewud et al. 2021 · included by 1 of these review
- Moimaz et al. 2016 · included by 1 of these review
- Nagarajappa et al. 2020 · included by 1 of these review
- Naidu et al. 2013 · included by 1 of these review
- Nakayama et al. 2019 · included by 1 of these review
- Nakayama et al. 2015 [a] · included by 1 of these review
- Nakayama et al. 2015 [b] · included by 1 of these review
- Ndekero et al. 2021 · included by 1 of these review
- Nobile et al. 2014 · included by 1 of these review
- Olczak-Kowalczyk et al. 2020 · included by 1 of these review
- Ozler et al. 2018 · included by 1 of these review
- Pattanaporn et al. 2013 · included by 1 of these review
- Pereira et al. 2021 · included by 1 of these review
- Perera et al. 2014 · included by 1 of these review
- Pinto et al. 2017 · included by 1 of these review
- Prakasha Shrutha et al. 2013 · included by 1 of these review
- Qadri et al. (2012) · included by 1 of these review
- Rashid Noaman et al. 2019 · included by 1 of these review
- Sankeshwari et al. 2013 · included by 1 of these review
- Schulz et al. 2022 · included by 1 of these review
- Seminario et al. 2018 · included by 1 of these review
- Severino et al. 2021 · included by 1 of these review
- Sharma et al. 2019 · included by 1 of these review
- Tubert-Jeannin et al. 2012 · included by 1 of these review
- Turton et al. 2019 · included by 1 of these review
- Tusek et al. 2020 · included by 1 of these review
- Wang et al. 2017 · included by 1 of these review
- Warren et al. 2016 · included by 1 of these review
- Wong 2011 · included by 1 of these review
- Wulaerhan et al. 2014 · included by 1 of these review
- Zhang et al. 2020 · included by 1 of these review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.