Question · asked by 1 review

Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence): Early childhood caries (ECC)

Population
Children aged 0-5 years in North Africa
Intervention
Not applicable (single-group prevalence)
Comparison
Not applicable (single-group prevalence)
Outcome
Early childhood caries (ECC)

Pooled ECC prevalence in Tunisia was 38% (95% CI 24-51), significantly lower than Egypt and Sudan.

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 10 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence)
Early childhood caries (ECC), prevalence · Children aged 0-5 years in North Africa · Tunisia, Country: Tunisia
Pooled ECC prevalence in Tunisia was 38% (95% CI 24-51), significantly lower than Egypt and Sudan.
Prevalence and risk factors for early childhood caries in North Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (2025) All outcomes
Prevalence 38 [24, 51]4 studiesGRADE not reported
Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence)
Early childhood caries (ECC), prevalence · Children aged 0-5 years in North Africa · North Africa, Sample size <500
Studies with <500 participants reported a lower pooled ECC prevalence (48%, 95% CI 39-58).
Prevalence and risk factors for early childhood caries in North Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (2025) All outcomes
Prevalence 48 [39, 58]9 studiesGRADE not reported
Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence)
Early childhood caries (ECC), prevalence · Children aged 0-5 years in North Africa · Sudan, Country: Sudan
Pooled ECC prevalence in Sudan was 63% (95% CI 52-74).
Prevalence and risk factors for early childhood caries in North Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (2025) All outcomes
Prevalence 63 [52, 74]3 studiesGRADE not reported
Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence)
Early childhood caries (ECC), prevalence · Children aged 0-5 years in North Africa · North Africa, Sample size >500
Studies with >=500 participants reported a higher pooled ECC prevalence (65%, 95% CI 55-75).
Prevalence and risk factors for early childhood caries in North Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (2025) All outcomes
Prevalence 65 [55, 75]9 studiesGRADE not reported
Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence)
Early childhood caries (ECC), prevalence · Children aged 0-5 years in North Africa · North Africa, Publication-bias adjusted (trim-and-fill)
After trim-and-fill adjustment for publication bias, the pooled ECC prevalence was 62% (95% CI 58-81).
Prevalence and risk factors for early childhood caries in North Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (2025) All outcomes
Prevalence 62 [58, 81]Not reportedGRADE not reported
Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence)
Early childhood caries (ECC), prevalence · Children aged 0-5 years in North Africa · Egypt, Country: Egypt
Pooled ECC prevalence in Egypt was 62% (95% CI 53-70).
Prevalence and risk factors for early childhood caries in North Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (2025) All outcomes
Prevalence 62 [53, 70]10 studiesGRADE not reported
Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence)
Early childhood caries (ECC), prevalence · Children aged 0-5 years in North Africa · North Africa (Egypt, Tunisia, Sudan, Morocco); community, school, and hospital-based, Overall (all included studies)
The pooled prevalence of ECC in North African children aged 0-5 years was 57% (95% CI 50-64), with very high heterogeneity (I2=98.6%).
Prevalence and risk factors for early childhood caries in North Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (2025) All outcomes
Prevalence 57 [50, 64]18 studies · 11319 participantsGRADE not reported
Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence)
Early childhood caries (ECC), prevalence · Children aged 0-5 years in North Africa · North Africa, Sampling: convenience
Convenience-sampling studies gave a pooled ECC prevalence of 60% (CI not reported in main text).
Prevalence and risk factors for early childhood caries in North Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (2025) All outcomes
Prevalence 604 studiesGRADE not reported
Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence)
Early childhood caries (ECC), prevalence · Children aged 0-5 years in North Africa · North Africa, Sampling: stratified/multistage cluster
Stratified/multistage cluster sampling studies gave a pooled ECC prevalence of 50% (95% CI 40-61); sampling technique was not a significant moderator.
Prevalence and risk factors for early childhood caries in North Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (2025) All outcomes
Prevalence 50 [40, 61]9 studiesGRADE not reported
Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence)
Early childhood caries (ECC), prevalence · Children aged 0-5 years in North Africa · North Africa, Sampling: simple random
Simple-random-sampling studies gave a pooled ECC prevalence of 67% (CI not reported in main text).
Prevalence and risk factors for early childhood caries in North Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (2025) All outcomes
Prevalence 675 studiesGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Prevalence and risk factors for early childhood caries in North Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
2025 All outcomes
March 202518Not applicable

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

Studies behind the findings

The primary studies the full-text reviews tie to this outcome. Reviews with headline outcomes only do not list them here.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.