Primary study · included by 2 reviews

Qadri et al. (2012)

ProbableThe reviews cited this study without a PMID, DOI or NCT, so it is matched by first author and year. Two different studies by the same author in the same year could be merged here.

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

Breast and Bottle Feeding as Risk Factors for Dental Caries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Non-Cochrane · aetiology · 2015 · cited as Qadri et al. (2012) · Table 1; Reference 16
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Presence of dental caries
Breastfeeding vs Bottle feeding
Four studies showed that bottle fed children had more dental caries (p<0.05), while three studies found no such association (p>0.05); the review concluded that breastfeeding can protect against dental caries in early…7 studiesUngraded
A systematic review and meta-analysis on early-childhood-caries global data.
Non-Cochrane · aetiology · 2024 · cited as Qadri et al. 2012 · Fig. 3 (ECC prevalence forest plot); Fig. 5 (by GNI)
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Early childhood caries (ECC) prevalence (%, dmft>0)
Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence)
Prevalence 36 [25, 47]13 studiesUngraded
Early childhood caries (ECC) prevalence (%, dmft>0)
Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence)
Prevalence 62NRUngraded
Early childhood caries (ECC) prevalence (%, dmft>0)
Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence)
Prevalence 47 [32, 62]14 studiesUngraded
Early childhood caries (ECC) prevalence (%, dmft>0)
Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence)
Prevalence 62NRUngraded
Early childhood caries (ECC) prevalence (%, dmft>0)
Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence)
Prevalence 42 [32, 53]3 studiesUngraded
Early childhood caries (ECC) prevalence (%, dmft>0)
Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence)
Prevalence 52 [45, 60]33 studiesUngraded
Early childhood caries (ECC) prevalence (%, dmft>0)
Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence)
Prevalence 49 [44, 55]67 studiesUngraded
Early childhood caries (ECC) prevalence (%, dmft>0)
Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence)
Prevalence 55 [42, 68]9 studiesUngraded
Early childhood caries (ECC) prevalence (%, dmft>0)
Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence)
Prevalence 39NRUngraded
Early childhood caries (ECC) prevalence (%, dmft>0)
Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence)
Prevalence 28NRUngraded
Early childhood caries (ECC) prevalence (%, dmft>0)
Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence)
Prevalence 53 [41, 65]14 studiesUngraded
Early childhood caries (ECC) prevalence (%, dmft>0)
Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence)
Prevalence 72 [58, 85]7 studiesUngraded
Early childhood caries (ECC) prevalence (%, dmft>0)
Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence)
Prevalence 57 [36, 77]5 studiesUngraded
Early childhood caries (ECC) prevalence (%, dmft>0)
Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence)
Prevalence 34 [20, 48]6 studiesUngraded
Early childhood caries (ECC) prevalence (%, dmft>0)
Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence)
Prevalence 30 [22, 38]11 studiesUngraded
Early childhood caries (ECC) prevalence (%, dmft>0)
Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence)
Prevalence 57 [47, 67]19 studiesUngraded

2 including reviews in total.