Higher parental education (tertiary) vs Parental high school (secondary) education: Early childhood caries (ECC)
- Population
- Healthy children under 6 years in South Africa
- Intervention
- Higher parental education (tertiary)
- Comparison
- Parental high school (secondary) education
- Outcome
- Early childhood caries (ECC)
Parental tertiary education (vs high-school education) was associated with about 1.8 times higher odds of early childhood caries in South Africa (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.22-2.57; 2 studies; not GRADE-rated).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Parental tertiary education vs Parental high school (secondary) education Dental caries (early childhood caries) · Healthy children under 6 years in South Africa · South Africa Parental tertiary education (vs high-school education) was associated with about 1.8 times higher odds of early childhood caries in South Africa (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.22-2.57; 2 studies; not GRADE-rated). Maternal and infant risk factors and risk indicators associated with early childhood caries in South Africa:… (2022) All outcomes | OR 1.77 [1.22, 2.57] | 2 studies · 505 participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maternal and infant risk factors and risk indicators associated with early childhood caries in South Africa: a systematic review. 2022 All outcomes | Up to 15 November 2020 (review conducted November 2020 to January 2021) | 29 | Not applicable |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Higher parental education (tertiary) vs Lower parental education (reference) · Children aged 0-5 years in North Africa · 1 review
Studies behind the findings
The primary studies the full-text reviews tie to this outcome. Reviews with headline outcomes only do not list them here.
- Dental Caries in African Preschool Children: Social Factors as Disease Markers · 1998 · included by 1 of these review
- Chosack 1990 · included by 1 of these review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.