Question · asked by 1 review

Early childhood caries / severe early childhood caries vs Caries-free controls: Change in height-for-age z score

The association between baseline caries and declining height-for-age persisted after adjustment (coefficient -0.02); ungraded.

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Early childhood caries / severe early childhood caries vs Caries-free children
Change in height-for-age z-score (adjusted model) · Children in early childhood (0-6 years) · ~9.73-month follow-up, China (preschool children), Shen et al. 2019 (China; adjusted)
The association between baseline caries and declining height-for-age persisted after adjustment (coefficient -0.02); ungraded.
The bi-directional relationship between growth stunting and early childhood caries: a rapid review. (2023) All outcomes
Regression coefficient -0.02 [-0.04, 0.01]1 study · 1111 participantsGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
The bi-directional relationship between growth stunting and early childhood caries: a rapid review.
2023 All outcomes
Not specified (included studies published 2015-2020; inclusion window 2012-2020)9Not applicable

Studies behind the findings

The primary studies the full-text reviews tie to this outcome. Reviews with headline outcomes only do not list them here.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.