Question · asked by 1 review
Flumecinol vs placebo: Pruritus
- Population
- participants with cholestatic pruritus (CP)
- Intervention
- Flumecinol
- Comparison
- placebo
- Outcome
- Pruritus
What each review found
Current versions onlyNo studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 2 · 100%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Summary of findings table ‐ Flumecinol vs placebo Pruritus · patients with cholestatic pruritus (CP) Pharmacological interventions for pruritus in adult palliative care patients (2024) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 50 participants | Low |
Flumecinol vs placebo Pruritus · participants with cholestatic pruritus (CP) Pharmacological interventions for pruritus in adult palliative care patients (2016) · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyearlier version CD008320.PUB3, superseded | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 50 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pharmacological interventions for pruritus in adult palliative care patients 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.