Studies

Primary studies

26,293 studies included by 1,022 non-Cochrane dental reviews extracted from full text, one record per study, so a study included by several reviews is counted once. Most are randomized trials; etiology and diagnostic reviews also include observational and accuracy studies. Cochrane reviews and reviews with only their headline outcomes do not list their included studies here yet.

18 studies

Sort:Most sharedNewestOldest
StudyYearReviewsReview outcomes linkedTrial data
Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Single Implant-Supported Zirconia Crowns Following a Digital and Conventional Workflow: Four-Year Follow-Up of…
Beck 2024 · Beck Florian, Zupancic Cepic Lana, et al. · Journal of Clinical Medicine
DOI:10.3390/jcm13020432
202412not extracted yet
Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Single Implant-Supported Zirconia Crowns Following a Digital and Conventional Workflow: Four-Year Follow-Up of…
Beck 2024 · Beck Florian, Zupancic Cepic Lana, et al. · Journal of clinical medicine
PMID:38256565
202411not extracted yet
Comparison between Conventional and Digital Workflow in Implant Prosthetic Rehabilitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Corsalini 2024 · Corsalini Massimo, Barile Giuseppe, et al. · Journal of functional biomaterials
PMID:38921523
202412not extracted yet
Evaluation of Prosthetic Marginal Fit and Implant Survival Rates for Conventional and Digital Workflows in Full-Arch Immediate Loading…
De Angelis 2023 · De Angelis Nicola, Pesce Paolo, et al. · Journal of Clinical Medicine
DOI:10.3390/jcm12103452
202314not extracted yet
Evaluation of Prosthetic Marginal Fit and Implant Survival Rates for Conventional and Digital Workflows in Full-Arch Immediate Loading…
De Angelis 2023 · De Angelis Nicola, Pesce Paolo, et al. · Journal of clinical medicine
PMID:37240558
202313not extracted yet
Fully Digital versus Conventional Workflows for Fabricating Posterior Three-Unit Implant-Supported Reconstructions: A Prospective Crossover Clinical…
Hashemi 2022 · Hashemi Ali Mahmoud, Hashemi Hamid Mahmoud, et al. · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
DOI:10.3390/ijerph191811456
202214not extracted yet
Fully Digital versus Conventional Workflows for Fabricating Posterior Three-Unit Implant-Supported Reconstructions: A Prospective Crossover Clinical…
Hashemi 2022 · Hashemi Ali Mahmoud, Hashemi Hamid Mahmoud, et al. · International journal of environmental research and public health
PMID:36141729
202214not extracted yet
Digital Versus Conventional Full‐Arch Implant Impressions: A Prospective Study on 16 Edentulous Maxillae
Chochlidakis 2020 · Chochlidakis Konstantinos, Papaspyridakos Panos, et al. · Journal of Prosthodontics
DOI:10.1111/jopr.13162
20201none statednot extracted yet
Digital Versus Conventional Full-Arch Implant Impressions: A Prospective Study on 16 Edentulous Maxillae.
Chochlidakis 2020 · Chochlidakis Konstantinos, Papaspyridakos Panos, et al. · Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists
PMID:32166793
20201none statednot extracted yet
Intrasubject comparison of digital vs. conventional workflow for screw‐retained single‐implant crowns: Prosthodontic and patient‐centered outcomes
Delize 2019 · Delize Vincent, Bouhy Alice, et al. · Clinical Oral Implants Research
DOI:10.1111/clr.13494
201911not extracted yet
Conventional versus Digital Impressions for Full Arch Screw-Retained Maxillary Rehabilitations: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Capparè 2019 · Cappare Paolo, Sannino Gianpaolo, et al. · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
DOI:10.3390/ijerph16050829
201913not extracted yet
Conventional versus Digital Impressions for Full Arch Screw-Retained Maxillary Rehabilitations: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Capparè 2019 · Cappare Paolo, Sannino Gianpaolo, et al. · International journal of environmental research and public health
PMID:30866465
201912not extracted yet
Intrasubject comparison of digital vs. conventional workflow for screw-retained single-implant crowns: Prosthodontic and patient-centered outcomes.
Delize 2019 · Delize Vincent, Bouhy Alice, et al. · Clinical oral implants research
PMID:31183902
201911not extracted yet
Accuracy of digital and conventional dental implant impressions for fixed partial dentures: A comparative clinical study.
Gedrimiene 2019 · Gedrimiene Agne, Adaskevicius Rimas, et al. · The journal of advanced prosthodontics
PMID:31754417
201911not extracted yet
Time‐efficiency analysis of the treatment with monolithic implant crowns in a digital workflow: a randomized controlled trial
Joda & Brägger 2016 (time-efficiency) · Joda Tim, Brägger Urs · Clinical Oral Implants Research
DOI:10.1111/clr.12753
201611not extracted yet
Patient-centered outcomes comparing digital and conventional implant impression procedures: a randomized crossover trial.
Joda 2016 (PROMs) · Joda Tim, Brägger Urs · Clinical oral implants research
PMID:25864771
201612not extracted yet
Time-efficiency analysis of the treatment with monolithic implant crowns in a digital workflow: a randomized controlled trial.
Joda 2016 (time) · Joda Tim, Brägger Urs · Clinical oral implants research
PMID:27796072
201611not extracted yet
Patient‐centered outcomes comparing digital and conventional implant impression procedures: a randomized crossover trial
Joda & Brägger 2016 (patient-centered) · Joda Tim, Brägger Urs · Clinical Oral Implants Research
DOI:10.1111/clr.12600
201512not extracted yet