evidencegaps
Primary study · included by 1 review

Intrasubject comparison of digital vs. conventional workflow for screw‐retained single‐implant crowns: Prosthodontic and patient‐centered outcomes

Delize 2019 · Delize Vincent, Bouhy Alice, Lambert France, et al. · Clinical Oral Implants Research · 2019

Included by

Clinical Effectiveness and Accuracy of Fully Digital Workflows Versus Conventional Methods in Implant-Supported Restorations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2026 · cited as Delize 2019 · Table 1; reference 45; Results
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Patient-reported comfort and satisfaction (VAS 0-100)
Fully digital workflow (intraoral scanning) vs Conventional workflow (elastomeric impression)
MD 13.98 [-7.74, 35.70]4 studies · 172 participantsModerate

1 including review in total.