evidencegaps
Primary study · included by 1 review

Accuracy of digital and conventional dental implant impressions for fixed partial dentures: A comparative clinical study.

Gedrimiene 2019 · Gedrimiene Agne, Adaskevicius Rimas, Rutkunas Vygandas · The journal of advanced prosthodontics · 2019

Included by

Clinical Effectiveness and Accuracy of Fully Digital Workflows Versus Conventional Methods in Implant-Supported Restorations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2026 · cited as Gedrimiene 2019 · Table 1; reference 43; Results
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Accuracy/fit (marginal fit or 3D deviation)
Fully digital workflow (intraoral scanning) vs Conventional workflow (elastomeric impression)
SMD 0.20 [-3.72, 4.12]3 studies · 120 participantsLow

1 including review in total.