Primary study · included by 2 reviews
Effectiveness of individualized 3D titanium-printed Orthognathic osteotomy guides and custom plates.
Kim 2023 · Kim Se-Hyang, Lee Sung-Min, Park Jung-Hyun, et al. · BMC oral health · 2023
Included by
The review does not say which of its outcomes this study informs.
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Combined three-dimensional linear deviation (mm), supportive summary Patient-specific implant (PSI) workflows (cutting/drilling guides and/or customized osteosynthesis plates) vs CAD/CAM occlusal splint or wafer workflows · Within 3 days to 1 month postoperative | MD -0.51 [-0.70, -0.33] | 14 studies | GRADE not reported |
Overall postoperative complications Patient-specific implant (PSI) workflows (cutting/drilling guides and/or customized osteosynthesis plates) vs CAD/CAM occlusal splint or wafer workflows · Postoperative (follow-up varied) | RR 1.01 [0.64, 1.60] | 9 studies · 538 participants | Low |
Combined three-dimensional linear deviation (mm), supportive summary Patient-specific implant (PSI) workflows (cutting/drilling guides and/or customized osteosynthesis plates) vs CAD/CAM occlusal splint or wafer workflows · Within 3 days to 1 month postoperative | MD -0.46 [-0.66, -0.25] | 9 studies | GRADE not reported |
Operative time (minutes), total bimaxillary operation time Patient-specific implant (PSI) workflows (cutting/drilling guides and/or customized osteosynthesis plates) vs CAD/CAM occlusal splint or wafer workflows · Intraoperative | MD -10.77 [-47.99, 26.44] | 4 studies | Very low |
Combined three-dimensional linear deviation (mm), supportive summary Patient-specific implant (PSI) workflows (cutting/drilling guides and/or customized osteosynthesis plates) vs CAD/CAM occlusal splint or wafer workflows · Within 3 days to 1 month postoperative | MD -0.56 [-0.92, -0.19] | 9 studies | GRADE not reported |
2 including reviews in total.