Primary study · included by 5 reviews
Physical Frailty and Oral Frailty Associated with Late-Life Depression in Community-Dwelling Older Adults.
Lin 2022 · Lin Ying-Chun, Huang Shan-Shan, Yen Cheng-Wei, et al. · Journal of personalized medicine · 2022
Included by
The review does not say which of its outcomes this study informs.
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Xerostomia (self-reported dry mouth) Not applicable (prevalence) vs Not applicable (prevalence) | Prevalence (%) 20 [18, 22] | 32 studies | GRADE not reported |
Xerostomia (self-reported dry mouth) Not applicable (prevalence review); xerostomia · Prevalence at time of survey | Prevalence, percent (random effects, Freeman-Tukey double arcsine, DerSimonian-Laird) 21 [19, 23] | 34 studies · 1640079 participants | GRADE not reported |
Xerostomia (self-reported dry mouth) Not applicable (prevalence) vs Not applicable (prevalence) | Prevalence (%) 21 [19, 23] | 33 studies | GRADE not reported |
Xerostomia (self-reported dry mouth) Not applicable (prevalence review); xerostomia · Prevalence at time of survey | Prediction interval 11% to 34% | 34 studies · 1640079 participants | GRADE not reported |
Xerostomia (self-reported dry mouth) Not applicable (prevalence) vs Not applicable (prevalence) | Prevalence (%) 20 [19, 22] | 33 studies | GRADE not reported |
The review does not say which of its outcomes this study informs.
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Physical frailty Oral frailty (exposure) vs No oral frailty (non-oral frailty or oral robust) · Cross-sectional association (baseline data) | OR 2.05 [1.71, 2.46] | 3 studies · 4609 participants | GRADE not reported |
Physical frailty Oral frailty (exposure) vs No oral frailty (non-oral frailty or oral robust) · Cross-sectional association (baseline data) | OR 2.39 [1.62, 3.53] | 3 studies · 5114 participants | GRADE not reported |
Physical frailty Oral frailty (exposure) vs No oral frailty (non-oral frailty or oral robust) · Cross-sectional association (baseline data) | OR 2.00 [1.28, 3.11] | 5 studies · 6358 participants | GRADE not reported |
Physical frailty Oral frailty (exposure) vs No oral frailty (non-oral frailty or oral robust) · Cross-sectional association (baseline data) | OR 3.58 [1.11, 11.52] | 6 studies · 3869 participants | GRADE not reported |
Physical frailty Oral frailty (exposure) vs No oral frailty (non-oral frailty or oral robust) · Cross-sectional association (baseline data) | OR 2.34 [1.96, 2.79] | 4 studies · 24749 participants | GRADE not reported |
Physical frailty Oral frailty (exposure) vs No oral frailty (non-oral frailty or oral robust) · Cross-sectional association (baseline data) | OR 5.09 [1.83, 14.16] | 6 studies · 22804 participants | GRADE not reported |
Physical frailty Oral frailty (exposure) vs No oral frailty (non-oral frailty or oral robust) · Cross-sectional association (baseline data) | OR 5.69 [1.15, 28.02] | 4 studies · 3086 participants | GRADE not reported |
Physical frailty Oral frailty (exposure) vs No oral frailty (non-oral frailty or oral robust) · Cross-sectional association (baseline data) | OR 9.63 [1.33, 69.61] | 3 studies · 1340 participants | GRADE not reported |
Physical frailty Oral frailty (exposure) vs No oral frailty (non-oral frailty or oral robust) · Cross-sectional association (baseline data) | meta-regression coefficient (beta) -1.55 [-2.23, -0.87] | NR | GRADE not reported |
Physical frailty Oral frailty (exposure) vs No oral frailty (non-oral frailty or oral robust) · Cross-sectional association (baseline data) | OR 3.33 [1.76, 6.31] | 11 studies · 11300 participants | GRADE not reported |
Physical frailty Oral frailty (exposure) vs No oral frailty (non-oral frailty or oral robust) · Cross-sectional association (baseline data) | OR 6.22 [0.60, 64.06] | 3 studies · 1858 participants | GRADE not reported |
Physical frailty Oral frailty (exposure) vs No oral frailty (non-oral frailty or oral robust) · Cross-sectional association (baseline data) | OR 2.53 [1.71, 3.74] | 3 studies · 22976 participants | GRADE not reported |
Physical frailty Oral frailty (exposure) vs No oral frailty (non-oral frailty or oral robust) · Cross-sectional association (baseline data) | OR 2.46 [2.05, 2.94] | 13 studies | GRADE not reported |
Physical frailty Oral frailty (exposure) vs No oral frailty (non-oral frailty or oral robust) · Cross-sectional association (baseline data) | OR 3.11 [1.89, 5.10] | 14 studies | GRADE not reported |
Physical frailty Oral frailty (exposure) vs No oral frailty (non-oral frailty or oral robust) · Cross-sectional association (baseline data) | OR 2.57 [2.09, 3.15] | 8 studies · 27809 participants | GRADE not reported |
Physical frailty Oral frailty (exposure) vs No oral frailty (non-oral frailty or oral robust) · Cross-sectional association (baseline data) | OR 2.77 [1.72, 4.46] | 3 studies · 4911 participants | GRADE not reported |
Physical frailty Oral frailty (exposure) vs No oral frailty (non-oral frailty or oral robust) · Cross-sectional association (baseline data) | OR 2.56 [2.08, 3.15] | 8 studies · 30407 participants | GRADE not reported |
Physical frailty Oral frailty (exposure) vs No oral frailty (non-oral frailty or oral robust) · Cross-sectional association (baseline data) | OR 1.76 [1.05, 2.97] | 3 studies · 1530 participants | GRADE not reported |
Physical frailty Oral frailty (exposure) vs No oral frailty (non-oral frailty or oral robust) · Cross-sectional association (baseline data) | OR 2.42 [1.99, 2.94] | 11 studies · 32936 participants | GRADE not reported |
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Depressive outcomes Poorer oral structural or functional status vs Better oral status or function | OR 1.336 [1.122, 1.592] | 7 studies | GRADE not reported |
Depressive outcomes Poorer oral structural or functional status vs Better oral status or function | OR 1.6075 [1.277, 2.0236] | 15 studies | GRADE not reported |
Depressive outcomes Poorer oral structural or functional status vs Better oral status or function | Ratio of ORs 2.0486 [1.4838, 2.8284] | 14 studies | GRADE not reported |
Depressive outcomes Poorer oral structural or functional status vs Better oral status or function | OR 1.624 [1.292, 2.042] | 14 studies | GRADE not reported |
Depressive outcomes Poorer oral structural or functional status vs Better oral status or function | OR 1.554 [1.29, 1.873] | 14 studies | GRADE not reported |
Depressive outcomes Poorer oral structural or functional status vs Better oral status or function | Ratio of ORs 0.9043 [0.7661, 1.0673] | 14 studies | GRADE not reported |
Depressive outcomes Poorer oral structural or functional status vs Better oral status or function | Ratio of ORs 0.7273 [0.5013, 1.0551] | 15 studies | GRADE not reported |
Depressive outcomes Poorer oral structural or functional status vs Better oral status or function | OR 1.29 [0.99, 1.69] | 15 studies | GRADE not reported |
Depressive outcomes Poorer oral structural or functional status vs Better oral status or function | OR 1.3632 [0.9508, 1.9544] | 15 studies | GRADE not reported |
Depressive outcomes Poorer oral structural or functional status vs Better oral status or function | OR 1.654 [1.321, 2.071] | 14 studies | GRADE not reported |
Depressive outcomes Poorer oral structural or functional status vs Better oral status or function | Ratio of ORs 0.905 [0.7196, 1.1383] | 15 studies | GRADE not reported |
Depressive outcomes Poorer oral structural or functional status vs Better oral status or function | OR 1.651 [1.257, 2.168] | 12 studies | GRADE not reported |
Depressive outcomes Poorer oral structural or functional status vs Better oral status or function | OR 1.651 [1.316, 2.071] | 14 studies | GRADE not reported |
Depressive outcomes Poorer oral structural or functional status vs Better oral status or function | OR 1.671 [1.35, 2.069] | 14 studies | GRADE not reported |
Depressive outcomes Poorer oral structural or functional status vs Better oral status or function | OR 1.584 [1.298, 1.933] | 14 studies | GRADE not reported |
Depressive outcomes Poorer oral structural or functional status vs Better oral status or function | Ratio of ORs 0.97 [0.5494, 1.7126] | 15 studies | GRADE not reported |
Depressive outcomes Poorer oral structural or functional status vs Better oral status or function | OR 1.335 [1.129, 1.58] | 3 studies | GRADE not reported |
Depressive outcomes Poorer oral structural or functional status vs Better oral status or function | OR 1.59 [1.276, 1.981] | 14 studies | GRADE not reported |
Depressive outcomes Poorer oral structural or functional status vs Better oral status or function | OR 1.8261 [1.4222, 2.3448] | 15 studies | GRADE not reported |
Depressive outcomes Poorer oral structural or functional status vs Better oral status or function | OR 1.4648 [1.3327, 1.61] | 14 studies | GRADE not reported |
Depressive outcomes Poorer oral structural or functional status vs Better oral status or function | Ratio of ORs 0.7663 [0.6724, 0.8732] | 14 studies | GRADE not reported |
Depressive outcomes Poorer oral structural or functional status vs Better oral status or function | OR 1.592 [1.278, 1.982] | 14 studies | GRADE not reported |
Depressive outcomes Poorer oral structural or functional status vs Better oral status or function | OR 1.614 [1.273, 2.046] | 13 studies | GRADE not reported |
Depressive outcomes Poorer oral structural or functional status vs Better oral status or function | OR 1.421 [1.231, 1.64] | 14 studies | GRADE not reported |
Depressive outcomes Poorer oral structural or functional status vs Better oral status or function | OR 1.633 [1.3, 2.052] | 14 studies | GRADE not reported |
Depressive outcomes Poorer oral structural or functional status vs Better oral status or function | OR 1.862 [1.385, 2.502] | 9 studies | GRADE not reported |
Depressive outcomes Poorer oral structural or functional status vs Better oral status or function | OR 1.633 [1.3, 2.052] | 14 studies | GRADE not reported |
Depressive outcomes Poorer oral structural or functional status vs Better oral status or function | OR 1.6273 [1.2767, 2.0742] | 15 studies | GRADE not reported |
Depressive outcomes Poorer oral structural or functional status vs Better oral status or function | OR 1.656 [1.324, 2.071] | 14 studies | GRADE not reported |
Depressive outcomes Poorer oral structural or functional status vs Better oral status or function | Ratio of ORs 1.6988 [1.0479, 2.7541] | 15 studies | GRADE not reported |
Depressive outcomes Poorer oral structural or functional status vs Better oral status or function | OR 1.655 [1.321, 2.075] | 14 studies | GRADE not reported |
Depressive outcomes Poorer oral structural or functional status vs Better oral status or function | OR 1.607 [1.283, 2.013] | 14 studies | GRADE not reported |
Depressive outcomes Poorer oral structural or functional status vs Better oral status or function | OR 1.692 [0.074, 38.498] | 2 studies | GRADE not reported |
Depressive outcomes Poorer oral structural or functional status vs Better oral status or function | OR 1.613 [1.311, 1.986] | 15 studies | Very low |
Depressive outcomes Poorer oral structural or functional status vs Better oral status or function | OR 2.588 [1.35, 4.961] | 5 studies | GRADE not reported |
Depressive outcomes Poorer oral structural or functional status vs Better oral status or function | Ratio of ORs 1.0485 [0.5064, 2.171] | 15 studies | GRADE not reported |
Depressive outcomes Poorer oral structural or functional status vs Better oral status or function | OR 1.266 [1.047, 1.531] | 6 studies | GRADE not reported |
Depressive outcomes Poorer oral structural or functional status vs Better oral status or function | OR 1.604 [1.17, 2.2] | 3 studies | GRADE not reported |
Depressive outcomes Poorer oral structural or functional status vs Better oral status or function | Ratio of ORs 1.0179 [0.6652, 1.5574] | 15 studies | GRADE not reported |
Depressive outcomes Poorer oral structural or functional status vs Better oral status or function | Ratio of ORs 1.1491 [0.7628, 1.7311] | 14 studies | GRADE not reported |
Depressive outcomes Poorer oral structural or functional status vs Better oral status or function | OR 1.637 [1.311, 2.044] | 14 studies | GRADE not reported |
Depressive outcomes Poorer oral structural or functional status vs Better oral status or function | OR 1.639 [1.301, 2.065] | 14 studies | GRADE not reported |
5 including reviews in total.