Primary study · included by 2 reviews

Alterations of pulmonary vascular resistance and pulmonary cyclic nucleotide metabolism in the hypoxic pig.

Degidi et al., 2012 · Kaukel E, Beier W, Lanser K, et al. · Basic research in cardiology · 1977

Included by

Resonance Frequency Analysis and Clinical Outcomes in Implant Dentistry: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Non-Cochrane · prognostic · 2026 · cited as Degidi et al., 2012 · Table 1

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0)	Pearson r 0.48362 [-0.070, 0.809]	3 studies	GRADE not reported
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0)	Pearson r 0.46 [0.34, 0.57]	20 studies	GRADE not reported
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0)	Pearson r 0.454 [0.333, 0.560]	19 studies	GRADE not reported
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0)	Pearson r 0.4760257 [0.201, 0.681]	2 studies	GRADE not reported
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0)	Pearson r 0.435 [0.307, 0.547]	19 studies	GRADE not reported
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0)	Pearson r 0.3927642 [0.261, 0.509]	16 studies	GRADE not reported
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0)	Pearson r 0.3953134 [0.271, 0.505]	9 studies	GRADE not reported
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0)	Pearson r 0.43 [0.32, 0.54]	21 studies	GRADE not reported
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0)	Pearson r 0.7551383 [0.614, 0.849]	2 studies	GRADE not reported
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0)	Pearson r 0.446 [0.318, 0.557]	19 studies	GRADE not reported
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0)	Pearson r 0.448 [0.322, 0.558]	19 studies	GRADE not reported
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0)	Pearson r 0.433 [0.306, 0.545]	19 studies	GRADE not reported
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0)	Pearson r 0.435 [0.309, 0.550]	19 studies	GRADE not reported
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0)	Pearson r 0.431 [0.302, 0.544]	19 studies	GRADE not reported
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0)	Pearson r 0.403 [0.289, 0.506]	19 studies	GRADE not reported
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0)	Pearson r 0.422 [0.295, 0.534]	19 studies	GRADE not reported
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0)	Pearson r 0.423 [0.297, 0.535]	19 studies	GRADE not reported
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0)	Pearson r 0.450 [0.327, 0.558]	19 studies	GRADE not reported
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0)	Pearson r 0.436 [0.308, 0.549]	19 studies	GRADE not reported
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0)	Pearson r 0.44 [0.32, 0.55]	20 studies · 6160 implants participants	Very low
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0)	Pearson r 0.432 [0.303, 0.546]	19 studies	GRADE not reported
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0)	Pearson r 0.4441092 [0.222, 0.622]	9 studies	GRADE not reported
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0)	Pearson r 0.427 [0.298, 0.540]	19 studies	GRADE not reported
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0)	Pearson r 0.456 [0.338, 0.559]	19 studies	GRADE not reported
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0)	Pearson r 0.437 [0.309, 0.549]	19 studies	GRADE not reported
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0)	Pearson r 0.445 [0.318, 0.555]	19 studies	GRADE not reported
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0)	Pearson r 0.407 [0.290, 0.513]	19 studies	GRADE not reported
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0)	Pearson r 0.5649868 [0.377, 0.708]	3 studies	GRADE not reported
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0)	Pearson r 0.436 [0.306, 0.550]	19 studies	GRADE not reported
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0)	Pearson r 0.4488072 [0.236, 0.620]	9 studies	GRADE not reported
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0)	Pearson r 0.451 [0.329, 0.558]	19 studies	GRADE not reported

Efficacy of adjunctive antibiotics compared to non-antibiotic therapies following mechanical debridement for peri-implantitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2026 · cited as Schar 2012 · Table 1

The review does not say which of its outcomes this study informs.

2 including reviews in total.