Primary study · included by 2 reviews

Pescheret 2017

ProbableThe reviews cited this study without a PMID, DOI or NCT, so it is matched by first author and year. Two different studies by the same author in the same year could be merged here.

Included by

The Effectiveness of Physical Adjunctive Interventions in the Acceleration of Orthodontic Tooth Movement: An Umbrella Review and Meta-Analysis.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2026 · cited as Pescheret 2017 · Supporting Information Table S4

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Reduction in Little's irregularity index (LII), mm AcceleDent vibration device vs Standard orthodontic treatment without the adjunctive intervention · Leveling and alignment	MD 0.21 [-0.52, 0.94]	3 studies · 108 participants	Low
Reduction in Little's irregularity index (LII), mm AcceleDent vibration device vs Standard orthodontic treatment without the adjunctive intervention · Leveling and alignment	MD 0.05 [-0.38, 0.49]	5 studies · 150 participants	Low

The impact of physical adjunctive interventions on outcomes of clear aligner treatment: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2026 · cited as Pescheret 2017 · Table 2; Table 3 (Little's Irregularity Index pooled rows); reference list

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Little's Irregularity Index, mandible AcceleDent vibration device plus clear aligners vs Clear aligners with sham device · Alignment stage	MD 0.44 [-0.80, 1.69]	2 studies · 48 participants	Very low
Little's Irregularity Index, maxilla AcceleDent vibration device plus clear aligners vs Clear aligners with sham device · Alignment stage	MD 0.08 [-0.86, 1.02]	2 studies · 49 participants	Very low

2 including reviews in total.