Primary study · included by 2 reviews

Olatosi et al. 2021

ProbableThe reviews cited this study without a PMID, DOI or NCT, so it is matched by first author and year. Two different studies by the same author in the same year could be merged here.

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

A systematic review and meta-analysis on early-childhood-caries global data.

Non-Cochrane · aetiology · 2024 · cited as Olatosi et al. 2021 · Fig. 4 (ECC mean-dmft forest plot); Fig. 6 (by GNI)

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Early childhood caries experience (mean dmft) Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence)	MEAN 1.62	NR	Ungraded
Early childhood caries experience (mean dmft) Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence)	MEAN 5.53 [3.94, 7.13]	6 studies	Ungraded
Early childhood caries experience (mean dmft) Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence)	MEAN 3.47 [1.37, 5.56]	3 studies	Ungraded
Early childhood caries experience (mean dmft) Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence)	MEAN 3.34 [1.79, 4.88]	13 studies	Ungraded
Early childhood caries experience (mean dmft) Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence)	MEAN 4.64 [3.38, 5.91]	19 studies	Ungraded
Early childhood caries experience (mean dmft) Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence)	MEAN 3.87 [2.84, 4.91]	30 studies	Ungraded
Early childhood caries experience (mean dmft) Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence)	MEAN 3.89 [1.62, 6.16]	7 studies	Ungraded
Early childhood caries experience (mean dmft) Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence)	MEAN 4.04 [2.39, 5.68]	9 studies	Ungraded
Early childhood caries experience (mean dmft) Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence)	MEAN 5.18	NR	Ungraded
Early childhood caries experience (mean dmft) Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence)	MEAN 4.28 [2.58, 5.97]	10 studies	Ungraded
Early childhood caries experience (mean dmft) Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence)	MEAN 3.95	NR	Ungraded
Early childhood caries experience (mean dmft) Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence)	MEAN 3.08 [2.42, 3.74]	3 studies	Ungraded
Early childhood caries experience (mean dmft) Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence)	MEAN 3.68 [2.99, 4.37]	60 studies	Ungraded
Early childhood caries experience (mean dmft) Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence)	MEAN 1.13 [0.72, 1.55]	9 studies	Ungraded
Early childhood caries experience (mean dmft) Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence)	MEAN 2.26 [0.69, 3.82]	11 studies	Ungraded
Early childhood caries experience (mean dmft) Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence)	MEAN 1.34	NR	Ungraded

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between sugar intake and dental caries in Nigeria.

Non-Cochrane · aetiology · 2024 · cited as Olatosi 2021 · Table 2 (row 12); Table 3; Reference 40 (not included in meta-analysis)

The review does not say which of its outcomes this study informs.

2 including reviews in total.