Primary study · included by 2 reviews

Wu 2024

Included by

Systematic review and meta-analysis of oral frailty prevalence among older hospitalized patients.
Non-Cochrane · prognostic · 2025 · cited as Wu et al. 2024 · Table 1; reference 53
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Prevalence of oral frailty
Oral frailty (condition of interest; no intervention) vs None (single-group prevalence)
Excluding any single study gave estimated prevalence ranging from 0.41 to 0.464 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of oral frailty
Oral frailty (condition of interest; no intervention) vs None (single-group prevalence)
Prevalence 0.51 [0.47, 0.55]27 studies · 11575 participantsGRADE not reported
Prevalence of oral frailty
Oral frailty (condition of interest; no intervention) vs None (single-group prevalence)
Prevalence 0.62 [0.57, 0.66]3 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of oral frailty
Oral frailty (condition of interest; no intervention) vs None (single-group prevalence)
Prevalence 0.50 [0.44, 0.56]19 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of oral frailty
Oral frailty (condition of interest; no intervention) vs None (single-group prevalence)
Prevalence 0.52 [0.48, 0.57]23 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of oral frailty
Oral frailty (condition of interest; no intervention) vs None (single-group prevalence)
Prevalence 0.51 [0.41, 0.61]6 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of oral frailty
Oral frailty (condition of interest; no intervention) vs None (single-group prevalence)
Prevalence 0.50 [0.43, 0.56]13 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of oral frailty
Oral frailty (condition of interest; no intervention) vs None (single-group prevalence)
Prevalence 0.45 [0.37, 0.53]5 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of oral frailty
Oral frailty (condition of interest; no intervention) vs None (single-group prevalence)
Prevalence 0.48 [0.42, 0.53]3 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of oral frailty
Oral frailty (condition of interest; no intervention) vs None (single-group prevalence)
Prevalence 0.42 [0.32, 0.51]3 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of oral frailty
Oral frailty (condition of interest; no intervention) vs None (single-group prevalence)
Prevalence 0.42 [0.36, 0.48]4 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of oral frailty
Oral frailty (condition of interest; no intervention) vs None (single-group prevalence)
Prevalence 0.52 [0.47, 0.57]14 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of oral frailty
Oral frailty (condition of interest; no intervention) vs None (single-group prevalence)
Prevalence 0.52 [0.48, 0.56]22 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of oral frailty
Oral frailty (condition of interest; no intervention) vs None (single-group prevalence)
Prevalence 0.54 [0.49, 0.60]8 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of oral frailty
Oral frailty (condition of interest; no intervention) vs None (single-group prevalence)
Prevalence 0.39 [0.32, 0.47]3 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of oral frailty
Oral frailty (condition of interest; no intervention) vs None (single-group prevalence)
Sequentially removing each study left the overall prevalence statistically consistent with 0.5126 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of oral frailty
Oral frailty (condition of interest; no intervention) vs None (single-group prevalence)
Prevalence 0.52 [0.47, 0.57]8 studiesGRADE not reported
The prevalence and associated factors of oral frailty in older Chinese patients with chronic conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Non-Cochrane · prognostic · 2026 · cited as Wu 2024 · Supplementary Material 2 (Table 2); reference 20
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Prevalence of oral frailty (OFI-8)
Not applicable (prevalence) vs Not applicable
Prevalence (%) 52.45 [41.67, 63.23]7 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of oral frailty (OFI-8)
Not applicable (prevalence) vs Not applicable
Prevalence (%) 53.13 [38.21, 68.04]11 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of oral frailty (OFI-8)
Not applicable (prevalence) vs Not applicable
Prevalence (%) 53.11 [41.45, 64.76]6 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of oral frailty (OFI-8)
Not applicable (prevalence) vs Not applicable
Prevalence (%) 43.32 [38.62, 48.02]2 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of oral frailty (OFI-8)
Not applicable (prevalence) vs Not applicable
Prevalence (%) 66.22 [53.09, 79.34]8 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of oral frailty (OFI-8)
Not applicable (prevalence) vs Not applicable
Prevalence (%) 60.06 [39.68, 80.44]7 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of oral frailty (OFI-8)
Not applicable (prevalence) vs Not applicable
Sensitivity analysis of oral frailty prevalence showed no significant difference in the pooled prevalence when any individual study was removed.16 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of oral frailty (OFI-8)
Not applicable (prevalence) vs Not applicable
Prevalence (%) 47.86 [36.32, 59.40]7 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of oral frailty (OFI-8)
Not applicable (prevalence) vs Not applicable
Prevalence (%) 57.18 [41.05, 73.31]5 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of oral frailty (OFI-8)
Not applicable (prevalence) vs Not applicable
Prevalence (%) 55.14 [46.23, 63.88]16 studies · 5045 participantsGRADE not reported
Prevalence of oral frailty (OFI-8)
Not applicable (prevalence) vs Not applicable
Prevalence (%) 59.66 [25.73, 93.60]4 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of oral frailty (OFI-8)
Not applicable (prevalence) vs Not applicable
Prevalence (%) 59.62 [44.50, 74.74]9 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of oral frailty (OFI-8)
Not applicable (prevalence) vs Not applicable
Prevalence (%) 54.33 [52.95, 55.71]16 studies · 5045 participantsGRADE not reported
Prevalence of oral frailty (OFI-8)
Not applicable (prevalence) vs Not applicable
Prevalence (%) 42.67 [34.67, 50.67]8 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of oral frailty (OFI-8)
Not applicable (prevalence) vs Not applicable
Prevalence (%) 59.54 [42.94, 76.14]9 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of oral frailty (OFI-8)
Not applicable (prevalence) vs Not applicable
Prevalence (%) 52.22 [39.99, 64.45]6 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of oral frailty (OFI-8)
Not applicable (prevalence) vs Not applicable
Prevalence (%) 45.09 [32.11, 58.07]6 studiesGRADE not reported

2 including reviews in total.