Primary study · included by 2 reviews

Chen Y 2025

Included by

Predictive models for dysphagia in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Non-Cochrane · prognostic · 2026 · cited as Chen 2025 · Reference list; Table 1
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Dysphagia risk
Malnutrition vs No malnutrition
OR 2.31 [1.66, 3.20]3 studiesGRADE not reported
Dysphagia risk
Cognitive impairment vs No cognitive impairment
OR 1.54 [1.19, 2.00]3 studiesGRADE not reported
Dysphagia risk
Malnutrition vs No malnutrition
OR 1.71 [0.76, 3.84]4 studiesGRADE not reported
The prevalence and associated factors of oral frailty in older Chinese patients with chronic conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Non-Cochrane · prognostic · 2026 · cited as Chen 2025 (Chen YP) · Supplementary Material 2 (Table 2); reference 16
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Prevalence of oral frailty (OFI-8)
Not applicable (prevalence) vs Not applicable
Prevalence (%) 52.45 [41.67, 63.23]7 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of oral frailty (OFI-8)
Not applicable (prevalence) vs Not applicable
Prevalence (%) 53.13 [38.21, 68.04]11 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of oral frailty (OFI-8)
Not applicable (prevalence) vs Not applicable
Prevalence (%) 53.11 [41.45, 64.76]6 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of oral frailty (OFI-8)
Not applicable (prevalence) vs Not applicable
Prevalence (%) 43.32 [38.62, 48.02]2 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of oral frailty (OFI-8)
Not applicable (prevalence) vs Not applicable
Prevalence (%) 66.22 [53.09, 79.34]8 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of oral frailty (OFI-8)
Not applicable (prevalence) vs Not applicable
Prevalence (%) 60.06 [39.68, 80.44]7 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of oral frailty (OFI-8)
Not applicable (prevalence) vs Not applicable
Sensitivity analysis of oral frailty prevalence showed no significant difference in the pooled prevalence when any individual study was removed.16 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of oral frailty (OFI-8)
Not applicable (prevalence) vs Not applicable
Prevalence (%) 47.86 [36.32, 59.40]7 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of oral frailty (OFI-8)
Not applicable (prevalence) vs Not applicable
Prevalence (%) 57.18 [41.05, 73.31]5 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of oral frailty (OFI-8)
Not applicable (prevalence) vs Not applicable
Prevalence (%) 55.14 [46.23, 63.88]16 studies · 5045 participantsGRADE not reported
Prevalence of oral frailty (OFI-8)
Not applicable (prevalence) vs Not applicable
Prevalence (%) 59.66 [25.73, 93.60]4 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of oral frailty (OFI-8)
Not applicable (prevalence) vs Not applicable
Prevalence (%) 59.62 [44.50, 74.74]9 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of oral frailty (OFI-8)
Not applicable (prevalence) vs Not applicable
Prevalence (%) 54.33 [52.95, 55.71]16 studies · 5045 participantsGRADE not reported
Prevalence of oral frailty (OFI-8)
Not applicable (prevalence) vs Not applicable
Prevalence (%) 42.67 [34.67, 50.67]8 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of oral frailty (OFI-8)
Not applicable (prevalence) vs Not applicable
Prevalence (%) 59.54 [42.94, 76.14]9 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of oral frailty (OFI-8)
Not applicable (prevalence) vs Not applicable
Prevalence (%) 52.22 [39.99, 64.45]6 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of oral frailty (OFI-8)
Not applicable (prevalence) vs Not applicable
Prevalence (%) 45.09 [32.11, 58.07]6 studiesGRADE not reported

2 including reviews in total.