Non-Cochrane · intervention · PM42795952

Effects of Botulinum Toxin Injection on Masticatory Muscle Activity in Sleep Bruxism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Val Matteo, Colonna Anna, Nykänen Laura, et al. · Journal of clinical medicine · 2026 · PubMed · doi:10.3390/jcm15187179

Findings

19 findings

Population
Adults with sleep bruxismBotulinum toxin type A injection into masticatory musclesPlacebo injectionEMG-based muscle activity, frequency and amplitude
Fixed-effect sensitivity analysis
Hedges g -0.84 [-1.13, -0.54]
GRADE not reported
5 studies · 101 participants
Adults with sleep bruxismBotulinum toxin type A injection into masticatory musclesPlacebo injectionEMG bruxism event frequency
Fixed-effect sensitivity; assumed correlation r=0.3; paired Cruse and change-score Ondo
Hedges g -0.570 [-0.943, -0.198]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Adults with sleep bruxismBotulinum toxin type A injection into masticatory musclesPlacebo injectionEMG bruxism event frequency
Fixed-effect sensitivity; assumed correlation r=0.9; paired Cruse and change-score Ondo
Hedges g -1.157 [-1.579, -0.735]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Adults with sleep bruxismBotulinum toxin type A injection into masticatory musclesPlacebo injectionEMG-based muscle activity, frequency and amplitude
Random-effects leave-one-out; excluding Lee et al. 2010
Hedges g -0.92
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Adults with sleep bruxismBotulinum toxin type A injection into masticatory musclesPlacebo injectionEMG-based muscle activity, frequency and amplitude
Primary post-treatment time points, typically 2–4 weeks · Overall; random effects
Hedges g -1.09 [-1.65, -0.54]
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
5 studies · 101 participants
Adults with sleep bruxismBotulinum toxin type A injection into masticatory musclesPlacebo injectionEMG bruxism event frequency
Fixed-effect sensitivity; assumed correlation r=0.7; paired Cruse and change-score Ondo
Hedges g -0.772 [-1.157, -0.386]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Adults with sleep bruxismBotulinum toxin type A injection into masticatory musclesPlacebo injectionEMG signal amplitude
Construct subgroup; fixed effect
Hedges g -1.31 [-1.95, -0.68]
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
2 studies
Adults with sleep bruxismBotulinum toxin type A injection into masticatory musclesPlacebo injectionEMG bruxism event frequency
Construct subgroup; fixed effect
Hedges g -0.70 [-1.04, -0.37]
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
3 studies
Adults with sleep bruxismBotulinum toxin type A injection into masticatory musclesPlacebo injectionQuestionnaire, clinical global impression and PSG bruxism frequencyNo consistent BoNT-A-specific benefit on subjectively/frequency-assessed bruxism
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
5 studies
Adults with sleep bruxismBotulinum toxin type A injection into masticatory musclesPlacebo injectionEMG bruxism event frequency
Fixed-effect sensitivity; assumed correlation r=0.5; paired Cruse and change-score Ondo
Hedges g -0.642 [-1.019, -0.266]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Adults with sleep bruxismBotulinum toxin type A injection into masticatory musclesPlacebo injectionShort-term adverse events
2 weeks to 6 months
Mild, transient adverse effects reported in 3/5 RCTs; no serious adverse events in any trial
Low
Downgraded: imprecision, indirectness
5 studies · 101 participants
Adults with sleep bruxismBotulinum toxin type A injection into masticatory musclesPlacebo injectionEMG-based muscle activity, frequency and amplitude
Random-effects leave-one-out; excluding Cruse et al. 2022
Hedges g -1.34
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Adults with sleep bruxismBotulinum toxin type A injection into masticatory musclesPlacebo injectionEMG bruxism event frequency
Fixed-effect sensitivity; assumed correlation r=0.0; paired Cruse and change-score Ondo
Hedges g -0.504 [-0.874, -0.135]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Adults with sleep bruxismBoNT-A injection into masseter and lateral pterygoidBoNT-A injection into masseter onlyMasseter EMG amplitude
2 weeks
no estimate extracted
GRADE not reported
1 study · 30 participants
Adults with sleep bruxismBoNT-A injection into masseter and lateral pterygoidBoNT-A injection into masseter onlyLateral pterygoid EMG amplitude
2 weeks
no estimate extracted
GRADE not reported
1 study · 30 participants
Adults with sleep bruxismBoNT-A injection into masseter and temporalisBoNT-A injection into masseter onlyEMG peak amplitudeno estimate extracted
GRADE not reported
1 study · 20 participants
Adults with sleep and/or awake bruxismBoNT-A injection into masseterBefore treatment, same participantsMasseter EMG amplitude
2 months
SMD (pre-post Cohen d) -1.51
GRADE not reported
1 study · 304 participants
Adults with sleep bruxismBoNT-A injection into masseter with or without lateral pterygoidBefore treatment, same participantsMasseter EMG amplitude
2 weeks
SMD (pre-post Cohen d) -2.77
GRADE not reported
1 study · 30 participants
Adults with sleep or awake bruxismBotulinum toxin type A injection into masticatory musclesNo treatment or untreated controlBruxism or masticatory muscle activityno estimate extracted
No studies found
0 studies

Included primary studies 12

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
Alzaeem 2025
Comparative effectiveness of injecting botulinum toxin type A in the masseter muscle with or without injection in the lateral pterygoid…
DOI:10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102404
2025this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Alzaeem 2025
Comparative effectiveness of injecting botulinum toxin type A in the masseter muscle with or without injection in the lateral pterygoid…
PMID:40350077
2025this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Cruse 2022
Efficacy of botulinum toxin type a in the targeted treatment of sleep bruxism: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, cross-over…
DOI:10.1136/bmjno-2022-000328
2022this review onlyEMG-based muscle activity, frequency and amplitudenot extracted yet
Cruse 2022
Efficacy of botulinum toxin type a in the targeted treatment of sleep bruxism: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, cross-over…
PMID:36110927
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Furuhata 2025
Factors Influencing the Effectiveness of Botulinum Toxin Therapy in Bruxism Management.
PMID:40864060
2025this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Lee 2010
Effect of Botulinum Toxin Injection on Nocturnal Bruxism
DOI:10.1097/phm.0b013e3181bc0c78
2010this review onlyEMG-based muscle activity, frequency and amplitudenot extracted yet
Lee 2010
Effect of botulinum toxin injection on nocturnal bruxism: a randomized controlled trial.
PMID:19855255
2010this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ondo 2018
Onabotulinum toxin-A injections for sleep bruxism
DOI:10.1212/wnl.0000000000004951
2018this review onlyEMG-based muscle activity, frequency and amplitudenot extracted yet
Ondo 2018
Onabotulinum toxin-A injections for sleep bruxism: A double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
PMID:29343468
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Shehri 2022
Evaluation of the Efficacy of Low-Dose Botulinum Toxin Injection Into the Masseter Muscle for the Treatment of Nocturnal Bruxism: A…
PMID:36474649
2022this review onlyEMG-based muscle activity, frequency and amplitudenot extracted yet
Shim 2014
Effects of botulinum toxin on jaw motor events during sleep in sleep bruxism patients: a polysomnographic evaluation.
PMID:24634627
2014this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Shim 2020
Botulinum Toxin Therapy for Managing Sleep Bruxism: A Randomized and Placebo-Controlled Trial.
PMID:32182879
2020this review onlyEMG-based muscle activity, frequency and amplitudenot extracted yet

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationAdults (18 years or older) diagnosed with sleep or awake bruxism (possible, probable or definite)Adults with sleep bruxism (n=8 studies; 455 participants); awake bruxism only indirectly captured
InterventionBoNT-A injection into masticatory muscles (masseter, temporalis, medial or lateral pterygoid)BoNT-A into masseter, with or without temporalis, medial or lateral pterygoid (n=8)
ComparisonPlacebo (saline) injection, no treatment/untreated arm, other conservative management, or active comparator (different BoNT-A protocol, muscle combination or dose)Placebo (n=5 RCTs, 101 participants); alternative BoNT-A protocol (n=2 RCTs); no control (n=1 observational)
OutcomesBruxism/masticatory muscle activity (EMG amplitude, EMG-derived events or Bruxism Index, PSG-scored RMMA, validated bruxism-frequency questionnaires or clinical global impression); adverse effects as safety outcomeEMG-based muscle activity (n=8; pooled n=5); questionnaire/CGI/PSG-frequency bruxism measures (n=6, narrative); adverse events (n=8)
Study designsRCTs (placebo-controlled or active-comparator) or prospective observational studiesPlacebo-controlled RCTs (n=5, incl. 1 crossover); active-comparator RCTs (n=2); prospective single-arm observational study (n=1)
TimingStudies published January 2005 to July 2026Follow-up 2 weeks to 6 months

AMSTAR 2 items

Two independent extractors rated each item. Their ratings are shown side by side because they have not been reconciled yet. The overall rating follows Shea et al. 2017: one critical flaw gives Low, more than one gives Critically Low.

ItemExtractor AExtractor BAgree
1Research question includes PICO componentsYesYesyes
2Protocol established before the reviewcriticalPartial YesPartial Yesyes
3Choice of study designs explainedNoNoyes
4Comprehensive literature searchcriticalNoPartial Yesno
5Study selection in duplicateYesYesyes
6Data extraction in duplicateYesYesyes
7List of excluded studies with reasonscriticalNoNoyes
8Included studies described in detailPartial YesYesno
9Risk of bias assessed satisfactorilycriticalRCT: Yes · NRSI: Partial YesNRSI: No · RCT: Yesno
10Funding of included studies reportedNoNoyes
11Appropriate meta-analysis methodscriticalRCT: Yes · NRSI: N/ANRSI: N/A · RCT: Yesno
12Impact of risk of bias on the pooled resultsNoNoyes
13Risk of bias accounted for in interpretationcriticalYesYesyes
14Heterogeneity explainedYesYesyes
15Publication bias investigatedcriticalNoNoyes
16Conflicts of interest reportedYesYesyes
OverallCritically LowCritically Lowyes