Non-Cochrane · intervention · PM42675477

Clear aligner therapy for adult anterior open bite: a systematic review, descriptive evidence map, and certainty appraisal of reported dentoskeletal changes.

Huang Xinqi, Lei Mengling, Liao Juntong, et al. · BMC oral health · 2026 · PubMed · doi:10.1186/s12903-026-09379-z

Findings

Population Adults or predominantly adults with anterior open bite

2 findings

Clear aligner therapyBefore treatment (single-arm change)Overbite increase (mm)
Completed treatment · Extended sensitivity analysis
MD 2.89 [2.21, 3.57]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
7 studies · 322 participants
Clear aligner therapyBefore treatment (single-arm change)Overbite increase (mm)
Completed treatment · Primary exploratory analysis
MD 3.07 [2.46, 3.69]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
5 studies · 206 participants

Included primary studies 10

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
Chamberland 2024
Noninvasive conservative management of anterior open bite treated with TADs versus clear aligner therapy.
PMID:38556610
20241 other reviewOverbite increase (mm)not extracted yet
Garnett 2019
Cephalometric comparison of adult anterior open bite treatment using clear aligners and fixed appliances.
PMID:30280928
20191 other reviewOverbite increase (mm)not extracted yet
Harris 2020
Evaluation of open bite closure using clear aligners: a retrospective study.
PMID:32830306
20201 other reviewOverbite increase (mm)not extracted yet
Moshiri 2017
Cephalometric evaluation of adult anterior open bite non-extraction treatment with Invisalign.
PMID:29160342
20171 other reviewPM42675477-P1-O2not extracted yet
Steele 2022
A comparative assessment of the dentoskeletal effects of clear aligners vs miniplate-supported posterior intrusion with fixed appliances…
PMID:35339320
20221 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Suh 2022
Treatment of anterior open bites using non-extraction clear aligner therapy in adult patients.
PMID:35527369
20221 other reviewOverbite increase (mm)not extracted yet
Withayanukonkij 2023
Root resorption during maxillary molar intrusion with clear aligners: a randomized controlled trial.
PMID:37922387
20231 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Arwa 2025
Cone beam computed tomography analysis of anterior open bite management using clear aligners: a single-arm retrospective study.
PMID:40646026
2025this review onlyOverbite increase (mm)not extracted yet
Burashed 2023
The efficacy of anterior open bite closure when using Invisalign's optimized extrusion versus conventional attachments.
PMID:37164825
2023this review onlyPM42675477-P1-O2not extracted yet
Karalikkattil 2024
Effectiveness of Invisalign Treatment on Open Bite Correction.
PMID:38595389
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet

Overlap with other reviews

Reviews that include the same primary studies are not independent evidence. Shared counts match studies by PMID, DOI or NCT, and otherwise by author and year (a probable match). Only the non-Cochrane dental reviews have study lists, so overlap with Cochrane reviews is not counted yet.

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationAdult or predominantly adult patients with anterior open biteAdult or predominantly adult anterior open bite (n=421 aligner-treated participants)
InterventionClear aligner therapy as the primary orthodontic modalityClear aligner therapy, mainly Invisalign (10 studies)
ComparisonNo comparator, fixed appliances, skeletal anchorage-assisted posterior intrusion, or other modalities when the aligner arm was separableNone (single-arm), fixed appliances, miniplate- or TAD-supported posterior intrusion, conventional attachments
OutcomesOverbite change, incisor extrusion or inclination, molar intrusion or posterior vertical change, mandibular plane angle, autorotation, treatment duration, stability, adverse effectsOverbite increase (7 studies pooled, n=322); descriptive dentoskeletal changes
Study designsRCTs, nonrandomized clinical studies, retrospective cohorts, comparative studies1 RCT, 9 nonrandomized studies (mostly retrospective)
TimingStudies published January 2010 to April 2026Treatment durations 14 to 29 months; one RCT 6 months

AMSTAR 2 items

Two independent extractors rated each item. Their ratings are shown side by side because they have not been reconciled yet. The overall rating follows Shea et al. 2017: one critical flaw gives Low, more than one gives Critically Low.

ItemExtractor AExtractor BAgree
1Research question includes PICO componentsYesYesyes
2Protocol established before the reviewcriticalPartial YesPartial Yesyes
3Choice of study designs explainedNoNoyes
4Comprehensive literature searchcriticalPartial YesPartial Yesyes
5Study selection in duplicateYesYesyes
6Data extraction in duplicateNoNoyes
7List of excluded studies with reasonscriticalYesPartial Yesno
8Included studies described in detailPartial YesYesno
9Risk of bias assessed satisfactorilycriticalRCT: Yes · NRSI: YesRCT: Yes · NRSI: Yesyes
10Funding of included studies reportedNoNoyes
11Appropriate meta-analysis methodscriticalRCT: N/A · NRSI: NoRCT: N/A · NRSI: Yesno
12Impact of risk of bias on the pooled resultsNoNoyes
13Risk of bias accounted for in interpretationcriticalYesYesyes
14Heterogeneity explainedYesYesyes
15Publication bias investigatedcriticalNoNoyes
16Conflicts of interest reportedYesYesyes
OverallCritically LowLowno