Non-Cochrane · intervention · PM42653103

Capsaicin for Orofacial Pain Management: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Andrade Ana Claudia de Macedo, Felix Fernanda Aragão, Brauchi Sebastián, et al. · International journal of molecular sciences · 2026 · PubMed · doi:10.3390/ijms27167099

Findings

11 findings

Population
Patients with orofacial pain (temporomandibular disorders, burning mouth syndrome)Capsaicin (topical 0.025% cream, topical 8%, or systemic 0.25%)Vehicle (placebo)Treatment-related adverse events
Follow-up 7 days to 30 days
OR 19.84 [4.32, 91.21]
431 [121, 762] more per 1000
Moderate
Downgraded: risk of bias
3 studies · 94 participants
Patients with orofacial pain (temporomandibular disorders, burning mouth syndrome)Capsaicin (topical 0.025% cream, topical 8%, or systemic 0.25%)Vehicle (placebo)Orofacial pain intensity (VAS 0 to 10)
End of treatment (final assessment) · Comparator: vehicle
MD -1.87 [-3.94, 0.19]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 93 participants
Patients with orofacial pain (temporomandibular disorders, burning mouth syndrome)Capsaicin (topical 0.025% cream, topical 8%, or systemic 0.25%)Vehicle (placebo)Baseline orofacial pain intensity (VAS 0 to 10; group comparability check)
Baseline (before treatment) · Comparator: vehicle
MD 0.03 [-1.08, 1.14]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 93 participants
Patients with orofacial pain (temporomandibular disorders, burning mouth syndrome)Capsaicin (topical 0.025% cream, topical 8%, or systemic 0.25%)Vehicle (placebo)Orofacial pain intensity (VAS 0 to 10)
30 days
MD -2.39 [-5.79, 1.01]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 78 participants
Patients with burning mouth syndromeCapsaicin 0.025% topical oral gelCapsaicin 0.01% topical oral gel (lower dose)Orofacial pain intensity (VAS 0 to 10)
End of treatment (final assessment) · Comparator: lower dose capsaicin
MD 0.46 [-2.67, 3.60]
GRADE not reported
1 study · 38 participants
Patients with burning mouth syndromeCapsaicin 0.025% topical oral gelCapsaicin 0.01% topical oral gel (lower dose)Baseline orofacial pain intensity (VAS 0 to 10; group comparability check)
Baseline (before treatment) · Comparator: lower dose capsaicin
MD 1.59 [-0.07, 3.25]
GRADE not reported
1 study · 38 participants
Patients with orofacial pain (temporomandibular disorders, burning mouth syndrome)Capsaicin (topical or systemic)Vehicle (placebo) or lower-dose capsaicinOrofacial pain intensity (VAS 0 to 10)
End of treatment (final assessment)
MD -1.10 [-2.79, 0.58]
-1.1 [-2.79, 0.58] points on VAS 0 to 10 (MD)
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
4 studies · 131 participants
Patients with orofacial pain (temporomandibular disorders, burning mouth syndrome)Capsaicin (topical or systemic)Vehicle (placebo) or lower-dose capsaicinBaseline orofacial pain intensity (VAS 0 to 10; group comparability check)
Baseline (before treatment)
MD 0.48 [-0.59, 1.54]
GRADE not reported
4 studies · 131 participants
Patients with orofacial pain (trigeminal neuralgia, peripheral neuropathic facial pain, burning mouth syndrome)Capsaicin (topical 0.025% or 0.05% cream/gel, 8% patch)Pre-treatment baseline (same patients; uncontrolled single-arm studies)Orofacial pain intensity (VAS 0 to 10)
End of treatment (final assessment)
MD -6.39 [-7.40, -5.38]
-6.39 [-7.4, -5.38] points on 0 to 10 scale (MD)
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
3 studies · 26 participants
Patients with orofacial pain (trigeminal neuralgia, peripheral neuropathic facial pain, burning mouth syndrome)Capsaicin (topical 0.025% or 0.05% cream/gel, 8% patch)Pre-treatment baseline (same patients; uncontrolled single-arm studies)Orofacial pain intensity (VAS 0 to 10)
12 weeks
MD -6.10 [-7.49, -4.71]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 14 participants
Patients with orofacial painCapsaicinOther (standard) pharmacological interventionsOrofacial pain reduction and tolerabilityA systematic review and meta-analysis comparing capsaicin with standard pharmacological treatments was not possible, since no eligible studies made such comparisons.
No studies found
0 studies

Included primary studies 9

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
Berger 1995
Oral capsaicin provides temporary relief for oral mucositis pain secondary to chemotherapy/radiation therapy.
PMID:7629418
1995this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Campbell 2017
Effects of High-Dose Capsaicin on TMD Subjects: A Randomized Clinical Study.
PMID:28879245
2017this review onlyOrofacial pain intensity (VAS 0 to 10); Baseline orofacial pain intensity (VAS 0 to 10; group comparability check); PM42653103-P1-O4not extracted yet
Fusco 1992
Analgesic effect of capsaicin in idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia.
PMID:1539818
1992this review onlyOrofacial pain intensity (VAS 0 to 10)not extracted yet
Goncalves 2020
8% Capsaicin Patch in Treatment of Peripheral Neuropathic Pain.
PMID:32967405
2020this review onlyOrofacial pain intensity (VAS 0 to 10); PM42653103-P4-O2not extracted yet
Jorgensen 2016
Analgesic effect of topical oral capsaicin gel in burning mouth syndrome.
PMID:28007005
2017this review onlyOrofacial pain intensity (VAS 0 to 10); Baseline orofacial pain intensity (VAS 0 to 10; group comparability check)not extracted yet
Petruzzi 2004
Systemic capsaicin for burning mouth syndrome: short-term results of a pilot study.
PMID:14720197
2004this review onlyOrofacial pain intensity (VAS 0 to 10); Baseline orofacial pain intensity (VAS 0 to 10; group comparability check); Treatment-related adverse events; PM42653103-P1-O4not extracted yet
Ricken 2021
Evaluation of a Protocol For Topical Application of Capsaicine Gel 0.025 % in the Management of Burning Mouth Syndrome Correlating its…
DOI:10.4067/s0718-381x2021000200443
2021this review onlyOrofacial pain intensity (VAS 0 to 10); PM42653103-P4-O2not extracted yet
Wagner 2013
The capsaicin 8% patch for neuropathic pain in clinical practice: a retrospective analysis.
PMID:23710678
2013this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Winocur 2000
Topical application of capsaicin for the treatment of localized pain in the temporomandibular joint area.
PMID:11203735
2000this review onlyOrofacial pain intensity (VAS 0 to 10); Baseline orofacial pain intensity (VAS 0 to 10; group comparability check); Treatment-related adverse events; PM42653103-P1-O4not extracted yet

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationHumans with orofacial painOrofacial pain: TMD (n=45), burning mouth syndrome (n=90), trigeminal neuralgia (n=16), oral mucositis (n=11), neuropathic facial pain (n=2); 164 participants
InterventionCapsaicinTopical capsaicin 0.01% to 8% (cream, gel, patch, lozenge) and oral systemic capsaicin
ComparisonPlacebo or other pharmacological interventionPlacebo or vehicle (n=3 trials); lower dose capsaicin (n=1 crossover trial); no comparator in single-arm studies
OutcomesEfficacy (pain reduction) and tolerability (adverse events)Pain scale scores; burning sensation; adverse events
Study designsClinical trials, cross-sectional, cohort and case-control studies3 randomized trials, 1 randomized crossover trial, 5 non-randomized studies
TimingNot specifiedEnd of treatment; 30 days; 12 weeks

AMSTAR 2 items

Two independent extractors rated each item. Their ratings are shown side by side because they have not been reconciled yet. The overall rating follows Shea et al. 2017: one critical flaw gives Low, more than one gives Critically Low.

ItemExtractor AExtractor BAgree
1Research question includes PICO componentsYesYesyes
2Protocol established before the reviewcriticalPartial YesPartial Yesyes
3Choice of study designs explainedNoNoyes
4Comprehensive literature searchcriticalPartial YesPartial Yesyes
5Study selection in duplicateYesYesyes
6Data extraction in duplicateYesYesyes
7List of excluded studies with reasonscriticalNoNoyes
8Included studies described in detailYesYesyes
9Risk of bias assessed satisfactorilycriticalRCT: Yes · NRSI: YesNRSI: Yes · RCT: Yesno
10Funding of included studies reportedNoNoyes
11Appropriate meta-analysis methodscriticalRCT: No · NRSI: NoNRSI: No · RCT: Nono
12Impact of risk of bias on the pooled resultsNoNoyes
13Risk of bias accounted for in interpretationcriticalYesYesyes
14Heterogeneity explainedYesYesyes
15Publication bias investigatedcriticalNoNoyes
16Conflicts of interest reportedYesYesyes
OverallCritically LowCritically Lowyes