Non-Cochrane · intervention · PM42494855

Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for temporomandibular disorders: efficacy on pain, maximal mouth opening, and dysfunction-a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Chen Li, Luo Yuan, Zhang Liyue, et al. · Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026 · PubMed · doi:10.3389/fresc.2026.1883205

Findings

Population Patients with temporomandibular disorders

9 findings

Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), alone or combined with other therapiesControl: conventional physical therapy, pharmacotherapy, sham ESWT or no specific interventionPain intensity (VAS/NRS)
Post-intervention · Mostly single-center trials in China · Number of shocks: <=1,500
SMD -0.97 [-1.80, -0.13]
GRADE not reported
6 studies · 403 participants
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), alone or combined with other therapiesControl: conventional physical therapy, pharmacotherapy, sham ESWT or no specific interventionMaximal mouth opening (MMO)
Post-intervention · Mostly single-center trials in China
MD 3.76 [1.52, 5.99]
GRADE not reported
12 studies · 823 participants
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), alone or combined with other therapiesControl: conventional physical therapy, pharmacotherapy, sham ESWT or no specific interventionPain intensity (VAS/NRS)
Post-intervention · Mostly single-center trials in China · Gender: female > male
SMD -0.82 [-1.28, -0.36]
GRADE not reported
7 studies · 461 participants
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), alone or combined with other therapiesControl: conventional physical therapy, pharmacotherapy, sham ESWT or no specific interventionPain intensity (VAS/NRS)
Post-intervention · Mostly single-center trials in China · Treatment period: >=4 weeks
SMD -1.79 [-2.09, -1.49]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 130 participants
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), alone or combined with other therapiesControl: conventional physical therapy, pharmacotherapy, sham ESWT or no specific interventionPain intensity (VAS/NRS)
Post-intervention · Mostly single-center trials in China · Gender: male > female
SMD -0.97 [-1.94, 0.00]
GRADE not reported
10 studies · 575 participants
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), alone or combined with other therapiesControl: conventional physical therapy, pharmacotherapy, sham ESWT or no specific interventionPain intensity (VAS/NRS)
Post-intervention · Mostly single-center trials in China
SMD -1.28 [-1.96, -0.61]
GRADE not reported
17 studies · 1036 participants
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), alone or combined with other therapiesControl: conventional physical therapy, pharmacotherapy, sham ESWT or no specific interventionPain intensity (VAS/NRS)
Post-intervention · Mostly single-center trials in China · Treatment period: <=2 weeks
SMD -0.79 [-1.38, -0.20]
GRADE not reported
14 studies · 906 participants
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), alone or combined with other therapiesControl: conventional physical therapy, pharmacotherapy, sham ESWT or no specific interventionPain intensity (VAS/NRS)
Post-intervention · Mostly single-center trials in China · Number of shocks: >1,500
SMD -1.07 [-1.46, -0.69]
GRADE not reported
8 studies · 501 participants
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), alone or combined with other therapiesControl: conventional physical therapy, pharmacotherapy, sham ESWT or no specific interventionTemporomandibular joint dysfunction index (DI)
Post-intervention · Mostly single-center trials in China
MD -0.05 [-0.13, 0.03]
GRADE not reported
13 studies · 850 participants

Included primary studies 23

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
Keskin Tunc 2024
Can extracorporeal shock wave therapy be effective in temporomandibular joint disorder?: A pilot study
DOI:10.1097/md.0000000000040052
20241 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Keskin Tunc 2024
Can extracorporeal shock wave therapy be effective in temporomandibular joint disorder?: A pilot study.
PMID:39470554
20241 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Law 2025
Safety and Efficacy of Shockwave Therapy for Myogenous Temporomandibular Disorders: Early Post-Treatment Results.
PMID:40992027
20251 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Li 2020
Treatment of Temporomandibular Joint Disorders by Ultrashort Wave and Extracorporeal Shock Wave: A Comparative Study
DOI:10.12659/msm.923461
20201 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Li 2020
Treatment of Temporomandibular Joint Disorders by Ultrashort Wave and Extracorporeal Shock Wave: A Comparative Study.
PMID:32564051
20201 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Han 2018
DOI:10.19787/j.issn.1008-1879.2018.06.012
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Han 2021
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-437x.2021.14.012
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Hu 2023
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-8982.2023.13.014
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Law 2025
Safety and Efficacy of Shockwave Therapy for Myogenous Temporomandibular Disorders: Early Post-Treatment Results
DOI:10.1016/j.identj.2025.103923
2025this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Lei 2023
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-1256.2023.07.004
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Lei 2024
DOI:10.16833/j.cnki.jbmc.2024.07.016
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Liu 2021
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-1634.2021.01.012
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Mao 2019
DOI:10.16047/j.cnki.cn14-1300/r.2019.10.012
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Marotta 2022
Effects of Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in Reducing Pain in Patients with Temporomandibular Disorders: A Pilot Randomized…
DOI:10.3390/app12083821
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Wang 2020
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7651.2020.03.001
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Wang 2023
DOI:10.19335/j.cnki.2096-1219.2023.20.046
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Wang 2024
DOI:10.13591/j.cnki.kqyx.2024.11.011
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Wei 2024
Effect of Extracorporeal Shock Wave on IGF-1, TNF-α, and IL-1in Joint Fluid of Patients with Temporomandibular Joint Disorder Syndrome
DOI:10.1007/s12013-024-01517-0
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Wei 2024
Effect of Extracorporeal Shock Wave on IGF-1, TNF-α, and IL-1in Joint Fluid of Patients with Temporomandibular Joint Disorder Syndrome.
PMID:39259406
2025this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Wu 2024
DOI:10.13638/j.issn.1671-4040.2024.21.025
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Xu 2016
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-7147.2016.06.059
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Zhang 2025
Pilot randomized controlled trial of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for temporomandibular joint disorders
DOI:10.1177/10538127241309240
2025this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Zhang 2025
Pilot randomized controlled trial of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for temporomandibular joint disorders.
PMID:39973094
2025this review onlynot statednot extracted yet

Overlap with other reviews

Reviews that include the same primary studies are not independent evidence. Shared counts match studies by PMID, DOI or NCT, and otherwise by author and year (a probable match). Only the non-Cochrane dental reviews have study lists, so overlap with Cochrane reviews is not counted yet.

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationParticipants with a confirmed diagnosis of TMD irrespective of age, gender, duration or severityPatients with TMD (n=1,150; 18 RCTs)
InterventionESWT as monotherapy or combined with other therapeutic modalitiesESWT alone (5 RCTs) or combined with physical therapy (8), pharmacotherapy (3) or traditional Chinese medicine (2)
ComparisonConventional physical therapy, pharmacological therapy, sham ESWT, or no specific interventionRehabilitation, sham therapy, medication, or no treatment
OutcomesVAS pain intensity, maximal mouth opening (MMO), temporomandibular joint dysfunction index (DI)Pain VAS (17 studies, n=1,036), MMO (12 studies, n=823), DI (13 studies, n=850)
Study designsRandomized controlled trialsRCTs (n=18)
TimingNot specifiedPost-intervention

AMSTAR 2 items

Two independent extractors rated each item. Their ratings are shown side by side because they have not been reconciled yet. The overall rating follows Shea et al. 2017: one critical flaw gives Low, more than one gives Critically Low.

ItemExtractor AExtractor BAgree
1Research question includes PICO componentsYesYesyes
2Protocol established before the reviewcriticalNoNoyes
3Choice of study designs explainedNoNoyes
4Comprehensive literature searchcriticalPartial YesPartial Yesyes
5Study selection in duplicateYesYesyes
6Data extraction in duplicateYesYesyes
7List of excluded studies with reasonscriticalNoNoyes
8Included studies described in detailPartial YesPartial Yesyes
9Risk of bias assessed satisfactorilycriticalNRSI: N/A · RCT: YesRCT: Yes · NRSI: N/Ano
10Funding of included studies reportedNoNoyes
11Appropriate meta-analysis methodscriticalRCT: Yes · NRSI: N/ARCT: Yes · NRSI: N/Ayes
12Impact of risk of bias on the pooled resultsNoNoyes
13Risk of bias accounted for in interpretationcriticalYesYesyes
14Heterogeneity explainedYesYesyes
15Publication bias investigatedcriticalYesYesyes
16Conflicts of interest reportedYesYesyes
OverallCritically LowCritically Lowyes