Non-Cochrane · other · PM42343426

Efficacy of probiotics in the management of oral candidiasis: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Mehta Vini, Galletti Cosimo, Mathur Ankita, et al. · Systematic reviews · 2026 · PubMed · doi:10.1186/s13643-026-03249-z

Findings

13 findings

Population
Patients with or at risk of oral candidiasis (elderly, denture wearers, children, mixed)Probiotics (any strain, dose or formulation)Placebo, no intervention or antifungal/other controlClinical cure of oral Candida infection
Source meta-analysis: Tang R 2025
OR 7.80 [4.78, 12.75]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Patients with or at risk of oral candidiasis (elderly, denture wearers, children, mixed)Probiotics (any strain, dose or formulation)Placebo, no intervention or antifungal/other controlOral Candida spp. count reduction / colonization
Source meta-analysis: Ai R 2017 (elderly)
OR 0.54 [0.38, 0.77]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Patients with or at risk of oral candidiasis (elderly, denture wearers, children, mixed)Probiotics (any strain, dose or formulation)Placebo, no intervention or antifungal/other controlOral Candida spp. count reduction / colonization
Source meta-analysis: Hu L 2019 (elderly and denture wearers; human studies only)
OR 0.24 [0.09, 0.63]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Patients with or at risk of oral candidiasis (elderly, denture wearers, children, mixed)Probiotics (any strain, dose or formulation)Placebo, no intervention or antifungal/other controlRecurrence of oral candidiasis after cure
Source meta-analysis: Tang R 2025
OR 0.21 [0.12, 0.35]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Patients with or at risk of oral candidiasis (elderly, denture wearers, children, mixed)Probiotics (any strain, dose or formulation)Placebo, no intervention or antifungal/other controlDetection rate of oral Candida
Source meta-analysis: Tang R 2025
OR 0.06 [0.01, 0.57]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Patients with or at risk of oral candidiasis (elderly, denture wearers, children, mixed)Probiotics (any strain, dose or formulation)Placebo, no intervention or antifungal/other controlOral Candida spp. count reduction / colonization
Source meta-analysis: Li P 2025
OR 0.38 [0.22, 0.68]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Patients with or at risk of oral candidiasis (elderly, denture wearers, children, mixed)Probiotics (any strain, dose or formulation)Placebo, no intervention or antifungal/other controlOral Candida spp. count reduction / colonization
Source meta-analysis: Mundula T 2019
OR 0.71 [0.37, 1.32]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
AdultsProbioticAntifungal agents/control/placeboReduction in the oral Candida spp. count
Umbrella review GRADE of evidence from included systematic reviews
Beneficial/positive Intervention effect
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, publication bias
30 studies · 3450 participants
AdultsProbioticAntifungal agents/control/placeboRecurrence rates post treatment
Umbrella review GRADE of evidence from included systematic reviews
Beneficial/positive Intervention effect
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, publication bias
16 studies · 1129 participants
AdultsProbioticAntifungal agents/control/placeboClinical cure rate of oral candidiasis
Umbrella review GRADE of evidence from included systematic reviews
Beneficial/positive Intervention effect
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, publication bias
21 studies · 1694 participants
Children (pediatric population)ProbioticAntifungal agents/control/placeboRecurrence rates post treatment
Umbrella review GRADE of evidence from included systematic reviews
no estimate extracted
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Studies not reported
Children (pediatric population)ProbioticAntifungal agents/control/placeboReduction in the oral Candida spp. count
Umbrella review GRADE of evidence from included systematic reviews
no estimate extracted
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Studies not reported
Children (pediatric population)ProbioticAntifungal agents/control/placeboClinical cure rate of oral candidiasis
Umbrella review GRADE of evidence from included systematic reviews
no estimate extracted
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Studies not reported

Included primary studies 32

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
Zhang 2023
matched by author and year (probable)
NR5 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Chen 2013
matched by author and year (probable)
NR1 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Ahola 2002
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ai 2017
A meta -analysis of randomized trials assessing the effects of probiotic preparations on oral candidiasis in the elderly
DOI:10.1016/j.archoralbio.2017.04.030
2017this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Burton 2013
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Chhabra 2019
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Elsayes 2024
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Hatakka 2007
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Hu 2019
In vivo effectiveness and safety of probiotics on prophylaxis and treatment of oral candidiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
DOI:10.1186/s12903-019-0841-2
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Huang 2009
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ishikawa 2015
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Keller 2018
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Kong 2008
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Kraft-Bodi 2015
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Krittika 2024
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Li 2025
Efficacy of probiotics for oral candidiasis management: a systematic review
DOI:10.1186/s12903-025-06468-3
2025this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Liang 2019
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Lopez-Jornet 2018
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Mendonça 2012
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Mishra 2016
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Miyazima 2017
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Mohitmafi 2023
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Mundula 2019
Effect of Probiotics on Oral Candidiasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
PMID:31615039
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Petti 2001
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Rane 2018
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Saha 2025
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Shah 2020
A systematic review of randomized trials on effects of probiotic on oral Candida
DOI:10.4103/jiaphd.jiaphd_88_19
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Sutula 2013
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Taipale 2012
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Tang 2025
Evaluating the efficacy of probiotics in the treatment of oral Candida infection: A meta-analysis
DOI:10.1159/000547106
2025this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Turska-Szybka 2025
Probiotics, Prebiotics, Synbiotics, and Postbiotics Against Oral Candida in Children: A Review of Clinical Trials.
PMID:40732878
2025this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Yang 2020
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet

Overlap with other reviews

Reviews that include the same primary studies are not independent evidence. Shared counts match studies by PMID, DOI or NCT, and otherwise by author and year (a probable match). Only the non-Cochrane dental reviews have study lists, so overlap with Cochrane reviews is not counted yet.

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationPatients with or without candidiasis or individuals at risk (denture wearers and immunocompromised patients)7 reviews (59 primary studies, 4739 participants): mixed populations (n=4), elderly and denture wearers (n=5), children 3-14 years (n=5), adults (n=2), infants (n=1)
InterventionAny dose, formulation or strain of probioticMulti-strain probiotics (Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Streptococcus, Propionibacterium and others) as tablets, capsules, cheese, lozenges, yogurt drinks, mouthwash, ice cream and powders
ComparisonNo intervention, any intervention, control/placeboPlacebo, blank control, antifungals (nystatin, fluconazole), chlorhexidine, herbal rinses, nutritional products
OutcomesReduction in oral Candida spp. count (CFU/mL); clinical cure rate; recurrence rateOral Candida spp. reduction (5 meta-analyses, OR 0.06 to 0.71); clinical cure and recurrence rate (one meta-analysis, Tang 2025)
Study designsFull-text systematic reviews with or without meta-analysis on human subjects, English language2 systematic reviews without meta-analysis and 5 systematic reviews with meta-analysis; 55 RCTs and 4 pre-post intervention studies
TimingNot specifiedIntervention duration 3 days to 2 years across reviews; primary studies published 2001 to 2025