Non-Cochrane · intervention · PM41880047

Effects of photobiomodulation on oral mucositis, oral pain, xerostomia, salivary flow rate, and quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Pedroso Mônica N M, Rech Anderson, Casagrande Natalia, et al. · Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026 · PubMed · doi:10.1007/s00520-026-10575-4

Findings

Population Adults with head and neck cancer receiving radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy

26 findings

Photobiomodulation (low-level laser therapy)Control (no intervention, placebo, mouthwash or usual care)Severe oral mucositis
Longest period of the intervention · Grading system: WHO staging
RR 0.24 [0.05, 1.07]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Photobiomodulation (low-level laser therapy)Control (no intervention, placebo, mouthwash or usual care)Salivary flow rate (stimulated and unstimulated)
Longest period of the intervention · Sensitivity analysis: SD of change imputed with r = 0.75
SMD 0.97 [0.12, 1.82]
GRADE not reported
6 studies
Photobiomodulation (low-level laser therapy)Control (no intervention, placebo, mouthwash or usual care)Severe oral mucositis
Longest period of the intervention · Grading system: RTOG scale
RR 0.34 [0.22, 0.53]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Photobiomodulation (low-level laser therapy)Control (no intervention, placebo, mouthwash or usual care)Quality of life (UW-QOL, FACT-HN, EORTC QLQ-C30, OHIP-14, Skindex-16, WHOQOL-bref, XeQoLS)
Longest period of the intervention · Sensitivity analysis: SD of change imputed with r = 0.75
SMD 1.06 [-0.03, 2.14]
GRADE not reported
11 studies
Photobiomodulation (low-level laser therapy)Control (no intervention, placebo, mouthwash or usual care)Severe oral mucositis
Longest period of the intervention · Emission spectrum: 810 to 940 nm
RR 0.47 [0.12, 1.08]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Photobiomodulation (low-level laser therapy)Control (no intervention, placebo, mouthwash or usual care)Quality of life (UW-QOL, FACT-HN, EORTC QLQ-C30, OHIP-14, Skindex-16, WHOQOL-bref, XeQoLS)
Longest period of the intervention · Sensitivity analysis: SD of change imputed with r = 0.25
SMD 1.06 [-0.03, 2.14]
GRADE not reported
11 studies
Photobiomodulation (low-level laser therapy)Control (no intervention, placebo, mouthwash or usual care)Quality of life (UW-QOL, FACT-HN, EORTC QLQ-C30, OHIP-14, Skindex-16, WHOQOL-bref, XeQoLS)
Longest period of the intervention
SMD 1.06 [-0.03, 2.14]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, publication bias
11 studies
Photobiomodulation (low-level laser therapy)Control (no intervention, placebo, mouthwash or usual care)Quality of life (UW-QOL, FACT-HN, EORTC QLQ-C30, OHIP-14, Skindex-16, WHOQOL-bref, XeQoLS)
Longest period of the intervention · Emission spectrum: 808 to 940 nm
SMD 1.46 [-0.72, 3.63]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Photobiomodulation (low-level laser therapy)Control (no intervention, placebo, mouthwash or usual care)Severe oral mucositis
Longest period of the intervention · Emission spectrum: 600 to 660 nm
RR 0.46 [0.26, 0.8]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Photobiomodulation (low-level laser therapy)Control (no intervention, placebo, mouthwash or usual care)Oral pain (continuous scores: VAS, EORTC QLQ-C30 pain domain)
Longest period of the intervention · Sensitivity analysis: SD of change imputed with r = 0.75
SMD -2.53 [-5.7, 0.63]
GRADE not reported
6 studies
Photobiomodulation (low-level laser therapy)Control (no intervention, placebo, mouthwash or usual care)Xerostomia (VAS, Treatment-Emergent Symptom Scale, Xerostomia Inventory)
Longest period of the intervention · Sensitivity analysis: SD of change imputed with r = 0.25
SMD -0.07 [-0.44, 0.3]
GRADE not reported
5 studies
Photobiomodulation (low-level laser therapy)Control (no intervention, placebo, mouthwash or usual care)Oral pain (continuous scores: VAS, EORTC QLQ-C30 pain domain)
Longest period of the intervention · Sensitivity analysis: SD of change imputed with r = 0.25
SMD -2.25 [-5.47, 0.96]
GRADE not reported
6 studies
Photobiomodulation (low-level laser therapy)Control (no intervention, placebo, mouthwash or usual care)Xerostomia (VAS, Treatment-Emergent Symptom Scale, Xerostomia Inventory)
Longest period of the intervention
SMD -0.07 [-0.47, 0.33]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, publication bias
5 studies
Photobiomodulation (low-level laser therapy)Control (no intervention, placebo, mouthwash or usual care)Salivary flow rate (stimulated and unstimulated)
Longest period of the intervention
SMD 0.75 [0.03, 1.46]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, publication bias
6 studies
Photobiomodulation (low-level laser therapy)Control (no intervention, placebo, mouthwash or usual care)Severe oral pain (VAS >=7)
Longest period of the intervention
RR 0.35 [0.23, 0.53]
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias, publication bias
3 studies · 250 participants
Photobiomodulation (low-level laser therapy)Control (no intervention, placebo, mouthwash or usual care)Severe oral mucositis
Longest period of the intervention · Grading system: NCI staging
RR 0.65 [0.32, 1.29]
GRADE not reported
5 studies
Photobiomodulation (low-level laser therapy)Control (no intervention, placebo, mouthwash or usual care)Severe oral mucositis
Longest period of the intervention
RR 0.46 [0.29, 0.71]
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
11 studies · 707 participants
PhotobiomodulationNo photobiomodulation (no intervention, mouthwash or placebo)Severe oral mucositis (WHO, RTOG or NCI grading)
Longest period of the intervention · Sensitivity analysis: omitting one outlier study
RR 0.39 [0.28, 0.54]
GRADE not reported
10 studies
Photobiomodulation (low-level laser therapy)Control (no intervention, placebo, mouthwash or usual care)Severe oral mucositis
Longest period of the intervention · Light source: diode
RR 0.49 [0.25, 0.98]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Photobiomodulation (low-level laser therapy)Control (no intervention, placebo, mouthwash or usual care)Oral pain (continuous scores: VAS, EORTC QLQ-C30 pain domain)
Longest period of the intervention
SMD -2.34 [-5.54, 0.85]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, publication bias
6 studies
Photobiomodulation (low-level laser therapy)Control (no intervention, placebo, mouthwash or usual care)Quality of life (UW-QOL, FACT-HN, EORTC QLQ-C30, OHIP-14, Skindex-16, WHOQOL-bref, XeQoLS)
Longest period of the intervention · Emission spectrum: 600 to 660 nm
SMD 0.46 [-0.5, 1.41]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Photobiomodulation (low-level laser therapy)Control (no intervention, placebo, mouthwash or usual care)Severe oral mucositis
Longest period of the intervention · Light source: He-Ne
RR 0.35 [0.17, 0.71]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Photobiomodulation (low-level laser therapy)Control (no intervention, placebo, mouthwash or usual care)Salivary flow rate (stimulated and unstimulated)
Longest period of the intervention · Sensitivity analysis: SD of change imputed with r = 0.25
SMD 0.62 [-0.02, 1.27]
GRADE not reported
6 studies
Photobiomodulation (low-level laser therapy)Control (no intervention, placebo, mouthwash or usual care)Xerostomia (VAS, Treatment-Emergent Symptom Scale, Xerostomia Inventory)
Longest period of the intervention · Sensitivity analysis: SD of change imputed with r = 0.75
SMD -0.14 [-0.59, 0.31]
GRADE not reported
5 studies
Photobiomodulation (low-level laser therapy)Control (no intervention, placebo, mouthwash or usual care)Salivary flow rate (stimulated and unstimulated)
Longest period of the intervention · Salivary flow type: unstimulated
SMD 0.69 [-0.16, 1.54]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Photobiomodulation (low-level laser therapy)Control (no intervention, placebo, mouthwash or usual care)Salivary flow rate (stimulated and unstimulated)
Longest period of the intervention · Salivary flow type: stimulated
SMD 0.75 [-0.32, 1.82]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported

Included primary studies 33

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
de Carvalho 2023
Photobiomodulation for the management of xerostomia and oral mucositis in patients with cancer: a randomized clinical trial.
PMID:37060370
20231 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Louzeiro 2020
Effect of photobiomodulation on salivary flow and composition, xerostomia and quality of life of patients during head and neck…
PMID:32570059
20201 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Mohamed 2022
matched by author and year (probable)
NR1 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Mozaffari 2024
Evaluation of the Effect of Photobiomodulation on Radiation-Induced Xerostomia in Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Randomized Clinical…
PMID:38655042
20241 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Oton-Leite 2013
Effect of low level laser therapy in the reduction of oral complications in patients with cancer of the head and neck submitted to…
PMID:24164228
20131 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Vianna Camolesi 2025
Photobiomodulation for the prevention of oral side effects secondary to head and neck cancer therapy: results of a randomised,…
PMID:40184883
20251 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Antunes 2013
Phase III trial of low-level laser therapy to prevent oral mucositis in head and neck cancer patients treated with concurrent…
PMID:24044799
2013this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Barati 2025
Effectiveness of Photobiomodulation (low-level laser therapy) on treatment of oral mucositis (OM) induced by chemoradiotherapy in head and…
PMID:39889324
2025this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Bensadoun 1999
Low-energy He/Ne laser in the prevention of radiation-induced mucositis. A multicenter phase III randomized study in patients with head…
PMID:10423050
1999this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Dantas 2020
Evaluation of preventive laser photobiomodulation in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radiochemotherapy: Laser in patients…
PMID:32544269
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
de Lima 2012
Oral mucositis prevention by low-level laser therapy in head-and-neck cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy: a phase III…
PMID:21163585
2012this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Fernandes 2023
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Gautam 2012
Low level helium neon laser therapy for chemoradiotherapy induced oral mucositis in oral cancer patients - a randomized controlled trial.
PMID:22502814
2012this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Gautam 2012
Low level laser therapy for concurrent chemoradiotherapy induced oral mucositis in head and neck cancer patients - a triple blinded…
PMID:22884841
2012this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Gautam 2013
Effect of low-level laser therapy on patient reported measures of oral mucositis and quality of life in head and neck cancer patients…
PMID:23224689
2013this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Gautam 2015
Low level laser therapy against radiation induced oral mucositis in elderly head and neck cancer patients-a randomized placebo controlled…
PMID:25704314
2015this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Gonnelli 2016
Low-Level Laser for Mitigation of Low Salivary Flow Rate in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Undergoing Radiochemotherapy: A Prospective…
PMID:27196626
2016this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Kauark-Fontes 2022
Extraoral photobiomodulation for prevention of oral and oropharyngeal mucositis in head and neck cancer patients: interim analysis of a…
PMID:34708311
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Legouté 2019
Low-level laser therapy in treatment of chemoradiotherapy-induced mucositis in head and neck cancer: results of a randomised, triple…
PMID:31118057
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Libik 2017
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Lopes 2006
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Lopez-Garzon 2025
Photobiomodulation for restoring salivary flow after radiotherapy in head and neck cancer: a randomised placebo-controlled trial.
PMID:41013422
2025this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Maiya 2006
Effect of low level helium-neon (He-Ne) laser therapy in the prevention & treatment of radiation induced mucositis in head & neck cancer…
PMID:17159259
2006this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Marín-Conde 2019
Photobiomodulation with low-level laser therapy reduces oral mucositis caused by head and neck radio-chemotherapy: prospective randomized…
PMID:30591391
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Martins 2021
The Effect of Photobiomodulation on Nitrite and Inflammatory Activity in Radiotherapy-Induced Oral Mucositis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
PMID:32997817
2021this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Martins 2021
Photobiomodulation reduces the impact of radiotherapy on oral health-related quality of life due to mucositis-related symptoms in head and…
PMID:33113075
2021this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Melo 2022
Impact of photobiomodulation for oral mucositis on body weight and BMI of patients with head and neck cancer.
PMID:35169872
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Oton-Leite 2012
Effect of intraoral low-level laser therapy on quality of life of patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radiotherapy.
PMID:21472883
2012this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Oton-Leite 2015
Effect of low-level laser therapy on chemoradiotherapy-induced oral mucositis and salivary inflammatory mediators in head and neck cancer…
PMID:25824475
2015this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Robijns 2021
Photobiomodulation therapy for the prevention of acute radiation dermatitis in head and neck cancer patients (DERMISHEAD trial).
PMID:33711412
2021this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Saleh 2014
Effect of low-level laser therapy on radiotherapy-induced hyposalivation and xerostomia: a pilot study.
PMID:25302460
2014this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Zanin 2010
Use of 660-nm diode laser in the prevention and treatment of human oral mucositis induced by radiotherapy and chemotherapy.
PMID:19764899
2010this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Zhang 2018
Application of red light phototherapy in the treatment of radioactive dermatitis in patients with head and neck cancer.
PMID:30419911
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet

Overlap with other reviews

Reviews that include the same primary studies are not independent evidence. Shared counts match studies by PMID, DOI or NCT, and otherwise by author and year (a probable match). Only the non-Cochrane dental reviews have study lists, so overlap with Cochrane reviews is not counted yet.

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationAdults with head and neck cancer who had received or were receiving radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy; excluded pre-existing oral mucositis1748 patients with head and neck cancer in 30 RCTs (33 articles); 28 trials in meta-analyses (1653 patients)
InterventionPhotobiomodulation protocolsPhotobiomodulation (31 protocols; diode 67.7%, He-Ne 16.1%)
ComparisonNon-exposed control group (no formal intervention, mouthwash or placebo)No photobiomodulation, mouthwash or placebo
OutcomesMucositis, xerostomia, salivary flow rate, oral pain and quality of life measured with validated questionnaires, protocols or scalesSevere oral mucositis (k=11), severe oral pain (k=3), oral pain level (k=6), xerostomia (k=5), salivary flow rate (k=6), quality of life (k=11)
Study designsRandomized controlled trials30 RCTs
TimingLongest period of the interventionLongest period of the intervention (radiotherapy period, mostly 6 to 7 weeks)

AMSTAR 2 items

Two independent extractors rated each item. Their ratings are shown side by side because they have not been reconciled yet. The overall rating follows Shea et al. 2017: one critical flaw gives Low, more than one gives Critically Low.

ItemExtractor AExtractor BAgree
1Research question includes PICO componentsYesYesyes
2Protocol established before the reviewcriticalYesYesyes
3Choice of study designs explainedNoNoyes
4Comprehensive literature searchcriticalPartial YesPartial Yesyes
5Study selection in duplicateYesYesyes
6Data extraction in duplicateYesYesyes
7List of excluded studies with reasonscriticalNoNoyes
8Included studies described in detailNoPartial Yesno
9Risk of bias assessed satisfactorilycriticalRCT: Yes · NRSI: N/ANRSI: N/A · RCT: Yesno
10Funding of included studies reportedNoNoyes
11Appropriate meta-analysis methodscriticalRCT: Yes · NRSI: N/ANRSI: N/A · RCT: Yesno
12Impact of risk of bias on the pooled resultsNoNoyes
13Risk of bias accounted for in interpretationcriticalYesYesyes
14Heterogeneity explainedYesYesyes
15Publication bias investigatedcriticalYesYesyes
16Conflicts of interest reportedYesYesyes
OverallLowLowyes