Non-Cochrane · intervention · PM41801622

Effect of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor and statin medication on periodontal status of patients at risk of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Khalilurrahman Zahid Affan, Anjani Saskia Kirana, Sulijaya Benso, et al. · The Saudi dental journal · 2026 · PubMed · doi:10.1007/s44445-026-00135-1

Findings

4 findings

Population
Patients with hypercholesterolemia (at risk of cardiovascular disease)Systemic statin medicationNon-statin groups (diet or normolipidemic controls)Bleeding on probing index (%)
Not specified · Not specified · Overall
MD -13.52 [-23.20, -3.83]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 175 participants
Patients with hypercholesterolemia (at risk of cardiovascular disease)Systemic statin medicationNon-statin groups (diet or normolipidemic controls)Clinical attachment loss (mm)
Not specified · Not specified · Overall
MD -0.16 [-0.40, 0.07]
GRADE not reported
4 studies · 232 participants
Patients with hypercholesterolemia (at risk of cardiovascular disease)Systemic statin medicationNon-statin groups (diet or normolipidemic controls)Probing depth (mm)
Not specified · Not specified · Overall
MD -0.38 [-0.53, -0.23]
GRADE not reported
4 studies · 232 participants
Adults with hypercholesterolemia (at risk of cardiovascular disease)Systemic statin medication (simvastatin, lovastatin or unspecified statin)Non-statin comparison (diet-controlled or normolipidemic participants)Bleeding on probing (BOP) index, %
Not specified · Not specified · Estimate as stated in abstract and text (differs slightly from Fig. 3)
MD -13.52 [-23.20, -3.83]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 175 participants

Included primary studies 6

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
Ari VC 2016
Statins and IL-1β, IL-10, and MPO Levels in Gingival Crevicular Fluid: Preliminary Results.
PMID:27290718
2016this review onlyBleeding on probing (BOP) index, %; Clinical attachment loss (mm); Probing depth (mm)not extracted yet
Magan-Fernandez A 2014
Association of simvastatin and hyperlipidemia with periodontal status and bone metabolism markers.
PMID:24555750
2014this review onlyClinical attachment loss (mm); Probing depth (mm)not extracted yet
Rad AB 2018
Evaluation of statins (Simvastatin and lovastatin) in reducing periodontal parameters in patients with chronic periodontitis
DOI:10.14741/ijmcr/v.6.5.15
2018this review onlyBleeding on probing (BOP) index, %; Clinical attachment loss (mm); Probing depth (mm)not extracted yet
Rodrigues M 2016
Effect of antihypertensive therapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on chronic periodontitis: a case-control study.
PMID:27470973
2016this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Sayar F 2016
Association of serum lipid indices and statin consumption with periodontal status.
PMID:27426870
2016this review onlyBleeding on probing (BOP) index, %; Clinical attachment loss (mm); Probing depth (mm)not extracted yet
Ustaoglu G 2020
Influence of different anti-hypertensive drugs on gingival overgrowth: A cross-sectional study in a Turkish population.
PMID:32991012
2021this review onlynot statednot extracted yet

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationPatients with hypertension or hypercholesterolemia (at risk of cardiovascular disease)Hypercholesterolemia patients on statins (4 studies, n=232 in meta-analysis); hypertensive patients on ACEI/ARB (2 studies)
InterventionACEI, ARBs or statins (systemic)Statins (simvastatin, lovastatin, unspecified) (n=4 studies); ACEI and ARB (n=2 studies)
ComparisonAnother medicated comparisonDiet-controlled or normolipidemic participants; non-ACEI antihypertensives (CCB)
OutcomesPeriodontal index (BOP, plaque index, gingival index), clinical attachment loss, probing depth; secondary: diagnosis of periodontal diseaseBOP (3 studies), clinical attachment loss (4), probing depth (4); plaque and gingival indices not pooled
Study designsClinical studies, clinical trials and RCTs published in English in the last 10 yearsCross-sectional (4), non-randomized controlled trial (1), case-control (1)
TimingNot specifiedStatin use >3 months; ACEI/ARB >=2 years where stated

AMSTAR 2 items

Two independent extractors rated each item. Their ratings are shown side by side because they have not been reconciled yet. The overall rating follows Shea et al. 2017: one critical flaw gives Low, more than one gives Critically Low.

ItemExtractor AExtractor BAgree
1Research question includes PICO componentsYesYesyes
2Protocol established before the reviewcriticalPartial YesPartial Yesyes
3Choice of study designs explainedNoNoyes
4Comprehensive literature searchcriticalNoNoyes
5Study selection in duplicateYesYesyes
6Data extraction in duplicateNoNoyes
7List of excluded studies with reasonscriticalNoNoyes
8Included studies described in detailPartial YesPartial Yesyes
9Risk of bias assessed satisfactorilycriticalRCT: N/A · NRSI: YesNRSI: Yes · RCT: N/Ano
10Funding of included studies reportedNoNoyes
11Appropriate meta-analysis methodscriticalRCT: N/A · NRSI: NoNRSI: No · RCT: N/Ano
12Impact of risk of bias on the pooled resultsNoNoyes
13Risk of bias accounted for in interpretationcriticalNoYesno
14Heterogeneity explainedYesNono
15Publication bias investigatedcriticalNoNoyes
16Conflicts of interest reportedYesYesyes
OverallCritically LowCritically Lowyes