Non-Cochrane · aetiology · PM41146427

Association Between Iron Deficiency Anemia and Dental Caries in Children: A Systematic Umbrella Meta-Analysis.

Fatih Mohammed Taib, Mahmood Mohammed Khalid, Ali Yad Mariwan Mohammed, et al. · Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025 · PubMed · doi:10.1111/jhn.70149

Oral HealthDental cariesAMSTAR 2: not applicable
Full textEvery question was extracted from the full text, figures and supplements by two independent LLM extractors, disagreements adjudicated. Rows cite where in the review the value comes from.
Questions
4
current version
GRADE rated
4
No studies
0
Included studies
13
linked below
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 3 · 75%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 1 · 25%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationChildren and adolescents aged 0-18 years, any sex, geographic area, or medical care settingChildren and adolescents 0-18 years (most reviews focused on <6 years); 5 systematic reviews/meta-analyses; 19,399 individuals (6803 cases / 12,596 controls); 48 primary studies (25 unique)
InterventionIron deficiency anemia / iron deficiency (diagnosed by clinical or laboratory criteria: haemoglobin, serum ferritin, serum iron, MCV)Iron deficiency anemia / low iron status
ComparisonChildren without anemia / without dental caries (non-anemic or caries-free comparison)Non-anemic children / caries-free children
OutcomesAssociation of dental caries with IDA in children; and mean differences in hematological indices (haemoglobin, serum ferritin, MCV) between children with vs without dental cariesDental caries (IDA: pooled OR 3.64, significant); serum ferritin, haemoglobin, MCV (pooled MDs, all lower in caries but non-significant)
Study designsSystematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies (cross-sectional, case-control, or cohort); narrative/scoping reviews, adult-only, and non-peer-reviewed sources excluded5 meta-analyses of observational studies (cross-sectional and case-control; one review also included cohort studies)
TimingNot specifiedNot specified

Search date: Before January 2025. Databases: PubMed; Scopus; Web of Science; Google Scholar

Questions and results

Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) vs Children without anemia (non-anemic)

Population: Children and adolescents (0-18 years; most included reviews focused on <6 years)
1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Dental caries (presence)
Children with iron deficiency anemia are over three times more likely to have dental caries than non-anemic children (OR 3.64, 95% CI 2.45 to 5.40; moderate certainty).
Source: Table 2; Results 'Association Between IDA and Dental Caries'; Abstract · same question in other reviews
OR 3.64 [2.45, 5.40]3 studiesModerate

Children with dental caries vs Children without dental caries (caries-free)

Population: Children and adolescents (0-18 years; most included reviews focused on <6 years)
3 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Mean corpuscular volume (MCV)
MCV tends to be lower in children with dental caries, but the pooled difference is not statistically significant (MD -1.96 fL, 95% CI -4.02 to 0.10; very low certainty).
Source: Table 2; Results 'Mean Corpuscular Volume' · same question in other reviews
MD -1.96 [-4.02, 0.10]3 studiesVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency, publication bias
Serum ferritin level
Serum ferritin tends to be lower in children with dental caries, but the pooled difference is not statistically significant (MD -3.96, 95% CI -8.48 to 0.57; very low certainty).
Source: Table 2; Results 'Serum Ferritin' · same question in other reviews
MD -3.96 [-8.48, 0.57]4 studiesVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency, publication bias
Haemoglobin level
Haemoglobin tends to be lower in children with dental caries, but the pooled difference is not statistically significant (MD -2.20 g/dL, 95% CI -4.59 to 0.19; very low certainty).
Source: Table 2; Results 'Haemoglobin' · same question in other reviews
MD -2.20 [-4.59, 0.19]3 studiesVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency, publication bias

Included primary studies 13

Open as a trial list
StudyAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial PICOResults
Shamsaddin 2017
matched by author and year (probable)
1 other reviewnot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Singh 2016
matched by author and year (probable)
1 other reviewnot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Aguirre-Ipenza et al. 2024
matched by author and year (probable)
this review onlynot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Akkareddy 2013
First high resolution spectroscopic studies and ab initio calculations of ethanetellurol.
PMID:20136116
this review onlynot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Amrollahi & Tarrahi 2022
matched by author and year (probable)
this review onlynot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Bansal 2016
matched by author and year (probable)
this review onlynot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Canchari 2020
matched by author and year (probable)
this review onlynot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Deane 2018
matched by author and year (probable)
this review onlynot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Easwaran et al. 2022
matched by author and year (probable)
this review onlynot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Jayakumar 2017
matched by author and year (probable)
this review onlynot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Nayak 2017
matched by author and year (probable)
this review onlynot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Schroth 2013
Amino acid delta13C analysis of hair proteins and bone collagen using liquid chromatography/isotope ratio mass spectrometry: paleodietary…
PMID:20131322
this review onlynot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Sharifi et al. 2021
matched by author and year (probable)
this review onlynot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet

Overlap with other reviews

Reviews that include the same primary studies are not independent evidence. Shared counts match studies by PMID, DOI or NCT, and otherwise by author and year (a probable match).