Cochrane · intervention · CD006205

Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers: surgical treatment

Worthington, HV, Bulsara, VM, Glenny, A-M, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2023 · Cochrane Library

Full textEvery question was extracted from the full review (methods and results), not only its Summary of Findings table.
Questions
45
current version
GRADE rated
28
No studies
12
Included studies
15
as reported
No studies 12 · 26.7%Ungraded 5 · 11.1%Very low 15 · 33.3%Low 6 · 13.3%Moderate 7 · 15.6%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationPeople with oral cancer (ICD-O C01-C06) or oropharyngeal cancer (C09, C10) with primary squamous cell carcinoma (including histological variants and carcinoma in situ); head and neck cancer studies included if >50% oral cavity/oropharyngeal or separable data; excluded hypopharynx (C13), nasopharynx (C11), larynx (C32), lip (C00), salivary gland malignancies, odontogenic tumours, sarcomas and lymphomas2820 participants randomised (2583 evaluated); approximately 2074 oral cavity cancers; 14 trials reported TNM stage; nine trials oral cavity only; earliest recruitment 1985
InterventionSurgical treatment of the primary tumour (scalpel-based surgery, laser cutting/ablation, or harmonic scalpel); surgical management of the cervical (neck) lymph nodes as part of primary tumour treatmentElective neck dissection; elective radical neck dissection; superselective neck dissection; supraomohyoid neck dissection; sentinel node biopsy; PET-CT following chemoradiotherapy; surgery plus radiotherapy; surgery (transoral robotic surgery); surgery plus adjuvant radiotherapy
ComparisonOne surgical treatment modality versus another; other treatment interventions (radiotherapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy/biotherapy or combinations) with versus without surgery; surgery versus no surgery (salvage/palliative surgery excluded)Therapeutic (delayed) neck dissection; elective selective neck dissection; selective neck dissection; modified radical neck dissection; elective neck dissection; planned neck dissection; radiotherapy alone; chemotherapy
OutcomesPrimary: overall survival (or total mortality); disease-free survival (new disease, progression and mortality); locoregional recurrence; recurrence. Secondary: adverse events associated with treatment; quality of life; direct and indirect costs; participant satisfactionOverall survival (12 trials); disease-free survival (10 trials); locoregional recurrence (11 trials); recurrence (11 trials); adverse events (10 trials); quality of life and costs in a few trials
Study designsRandomised controlled trials, including cluster-RCTsRandomised controlled trials
TimingNot specifiedNot reported

Search date: 2022-02. Databases: Cochrane Oral Health's Trials Register (to 9 February 2022); CENTRAL (2022, Issue 1); MEDLINE Ovid (1946 to 9 February 2022); Embase Ovid (1980 to 9 February 2022); ClinicalTrials.gov; WHO ICTRP

Questions and results

Current version only

Surgery vs Radiotherapy alone

Population: Adults with oropharyngeal cancer
CD006205.PUB5 (current) · 5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Total mortality
3 years
HR 0.83 [0.09, 7.46]
500 per 1000 (Warnakulasuriya 2009) vs 437 per 1000 (60 to 994)
1 study · 68 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Locoregional recurrence
Locoregional recurrence: not reported.0 studiesNo studies
Adverse events associated with treatment
Adverse events: grade 2+ treatment-related events similar (31/34 radiotherapy vs 33/34 surgery; RR 0.94, 0.83 to 1.06); more hearing loss/neutropenia/constipation/tinnitus with radiotherapy, more oral bleeding/trismus…1 study · 68 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Disease-free survival (new disease, progression, and mortality)
3 years
HR 1.07 [0.27, 4.22]
600 per 1000 vs 625 per 1000 (219 to 979)
1 study · 68 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Recurrence
Recurrence: not reported.0 studiesNo studies

Surgery plus radiotherapy vs Radiotherapy alone

Population: Adults with oral cavity or oropharyngeal cancer
CD006205.PUB5 (current) · 5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Locoregional recurrence
Locoregional recurrence: not reported.0 studiesNo studies
Total mortality
3 years
HR 0.24 [0.10, 0.59]
500 per 1000 (Warnakulasuriya 2009) vs 153 per 1000 (67 to 336)
1 study · 35 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Recurrence
Recurrence: not reported.0 studiesNo studies
Disease-free survival
Disease-free survival: not reported.0 studiesNo studies
Adverse events associated with treatment
Adverse events: severe acute effects in both groups (subcutaneous fibrosis, telangiectasia, moderate-to-severe oedema, xerostomia, trismus, dysphagia); subcutaneous fibrosis more prevalent with surgery + radiotherapy…1 study · 35 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision

Elective neck dissection (at time of primary tumour resection) vs Therapeutic (delayed) neck dissection

Population: Adults with oral cavity cancer (tongue or floor of mouth) and clinically negative neck nodes
CD006205.PUB5 (current) · 5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Recurrence
3 years
RR 0.58 [0.48, 0.70]
600 per 1000 (D'Cruz 2015) vs 348 per 1000 (288 to 420)
3 studies · 633 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Adverse events associated with treatment
RR 1.31 [1.11, 1.54]2 studies · 746 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Locoregional recurrence
3 years
HR 0.58 [0.43, 0.78]
300 per 1000 (Hutchison 2019) vs 187 per 1000 (142 to 243)
4 studies · 458 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Mortality (overall survival)
3 years
HR 0.64 [0.50, 0.83]
350 per 1000 (D'Cruz 2015); 250 per 1000 (Hutchison 2019) vs 241 per 1000 (194 to 301); 168 per 1000 (134 to 212)
4 studies · 883 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Disease-free survival (new disease, progression, and mortality)
3 years
HR 0.56 [0.45, 0.70]
550 per 1000 (D'Cruz 2015); 450 per 1000 (Hutchison 2019) vs 361 per 1000 (302 to 428); 285 per 1000 (236 to 342)
5 studies · 954 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias

Elective radical (comprehensive) neck dissection vs Elective selective neck dissection

Population: Adults with oral cavity cancer
CD006205.PUB5 (current) · 5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Total mortality
Total mortality: 2 trials reported HR but could not be pooled (different surgical procedures); neither indicated a difference (BHNCSG 1998 HR 1.14, 0.70 to 1.86; Bier 1994 HR 0.87, 0.41 to 1.83); 252 participants (2…2 studies · 252 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
Adverse events associated with treatment
Adverse events (BHNCSG 1998): flap necrosis, wound infection, fistula, vascular rupture, haematoma, seroma, chyle fistula; no complications in 45/76 modified radical ND and 54/72 supraomohyoid ND; 2 vs 1 postoperative…1 study · 148 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Locoregional recurrence
Locoregional recurrence: not reported.0 studiesNo studies
Recurrence
5 years
RR 1.21 [0.63, 2.33]
250 per 1000 (BHNCSG 1998) vs 303 per 1000 (158 to 583)
1 study · 143 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Disease-free survival (new disease, progression, and mortality)
5 years
HR 0.57 [0.29, 1.11]
300 per 1000 (D'Cruz 2015/Hutchison 2019) vs 184 per 1000 (142 to 243)
1 study · 104 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision

PET-CT following chemoradiotherapy (neck dissection only if no/incomplete response) vs Planned neck dissection before or after chemoradiotherapy

Population: Adults with oral cavity or oropharyngeal cancer with nodal disease (stage N2 or N3)
CD006205.PUB5 (current) · 5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Recurrence
Recurrence: outcome not reported in a usable way (Mehanna 2017: nodal recurrence 3 vs 1; distant metastases 21 vs 23).1 studyUngraded
Total mortality
3 years
HR 0.92 [0.65, 1.31]
200 per 1000 (D'Cruz 2015/Hutchison 2019) vs 186 per 1000 (135 to 253)
1 study · 564 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision
Locoregional recurrence
3 years
HR 1.00 [0.94, 1.06]
200 per 1000 (Hutchison 2019) vs 200 per 1000 (189 to 211)
1 study · 564 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision
Adverse events associated with treatment
Adverse events: 22 surgical complications in the PET-CT group vs 83 in the planned-surgery group (Mehanna 2017).1 study · 564 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Disease-free survival
Disease-free survival: outcome not reported in a usable way (Mehanna 2017: disease-specific and other-cause mortality did not differ, P=0.80 and 0.41).1 studyUngraded

Surgery plus adjuvant radiotherapy vs Chemotherapy (chemoradiotherapy)

Population: Adults with oral cavity or oropharyngeal cancer
CD006205.PUB5 (current) · 5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Adverse events associated with treatment
Adverse events: not reported for any participants (Iyer 2015).0 studiesNo studies
Disease-free survival
oral cavity
Disease-free survival: not reported (Iyer 2015).0 studiesNo studies
Total mortality
oral cavity
Total mortality: study reported survival significantly better with surgery and RT vs chemoradiotherapy, but no useable data; 32 participants (1 RCT, Iyer 2015 oral cavity subgroup).1 study · 32 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Recurrence
oral cavity
Recurrence: not reported for the oral cancer subgroup (Iyer 2015).0 studiesNo studies
Locoregional recurrence
oral cavity
Locoregional recurrence: reported difference between groups not statistically significant (P=0.355), but no useable data; 32 participants (1 RCT, Iyer 2015).1 study · 32 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision

Supraomohyoid neck dissection vs Modified radical neck dissection

Population: Adults with oral cavity or oropharyngeal cancer
CD006205.PUB5 (current) · 5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Locoregional recurrence
Locoregional recurrence: reported but not usable (variable follow-up) (Guo 2014).1 studyUngraded
Disease-free survival
Disease-free survival: not reported (Guo 2014 reported disease-specific survival, not a review outcome).0 studiesNo studies
Adverse events associated with treatment
Adverse events: significant difference in complication rates, lower for supraomohyoid (SOND 13.0% vs MRND 21.9%, P=0.040). UW-QOL at 1 year: supraomohyoid superior in pain relief (78.8% vs 75.2%, P=0.013) and shoulder…1 study · 332 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Total mortality
Total mortality: reported but not usable (Guo 2014: during follow-up 113/322 (35.1%) died; SOND 53, MRND 60). No GRADE rating.1 studyUngraded
Recurrence
Recurrence: reported but not usable (variable follow-up) (Guo 2014).1 studyUngraded

Superselective neck dissection vs Selective neck dissection

Population: Adults with oral cavity cancer (tongue or floor of mouth) and clinically negative neck nodes
CD006205.PUB5 (current) · 5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Disease-free survival (new disease, progression, and mortality)
36 months
Disease-free survival: Pandey 2018 reported 83% (superselective) vs 91% (selective) at median 36 months, not significant (P=0.69); unable to analyse (variable follow-up); 32 participants (1 RCT).1 study · 32 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Total mortality
Total mortality: not reported.0 studiesNo studies
Adverse events associated with treatment
Adverse events: no adverse events reported; 72 participants (2 RCTs).2 studies · 72 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Recurrence
Recurrence: outcome not reported in a usable way in either study.0 studiesNo studies
Locoregional recurrence
Locoregional recurrence: data not presented usably and inconsistent; Pandey 2018 no difference (3/12 vs 3/20); Rastogi 2018 lower recurrence with superselective (Kaplan-Meier P<0.05); 72 participants (2 RCTs).2 studies · 72 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision

Sentinel node biopsy (neck dissection only if biopsy positive) vs Elective neck dissection

Population: Adults with oral cavity or oropharyngeal cancer
CD006205.PUB5 (current) · 5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Locoregional recurrence
3 years
HR 1.04 [0.91, 1.19]
200 per 1000 vs 207 per 1000 (184 to 233)
1 study · 279 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Adverse events associated with treatment
Adverse events: no adverse events were reported (Garrel 2020).1 study · 279 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Recurrence
Recurrence: Garrel 2020 reported that the number of patients with recurrences in both arms was almost identical; unable to use the data (variable follow-up); 279 participants (1 RCT).1 study · 279 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Total mortality
3 years
HR 1.00 [0.90, 1.11]
200 per 1000 (D'Cruz 2015/Hutchison 2019) vs 200 per 1000 (182 to 219)
1 study · 279 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Disease-free survival (new disease, progression, and mortality)
3 years
HR 0.98 [0.90, 1.07]
300 per 1000 vs 295 per 1000 (275 to 317)
1 study · 279 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision

Surgery plus radiotherapy vs Radiotherapy alone

Population: Adults with oral cavity or oropharyngeal cancer
CD006205.PUB4 · 5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Locoregional recurrence
Locoregional recurrence: not reported.0 studiesNo studies
Recurrence
Recurrence: not reported.0 studiesNo studies
Adverse events
Severe acute adverse effects in both groups (subcutaneous fibrosis, telangiectasia, moderate-to-severe oedema, xerostomia, trismus, dysphagia); subcutaneous fibrosis more prevalent in surgery plus radiotherapy group…1 studyUngraded
Disease-free survival
Disease-free survival: not reported.0 studiesNo studies
Total mortality
3 years
HR 0.24 [0.10, 0.59]
500 per 1000 vs 153 per 1000 (67 to 336)
1 study · 35 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision

Elective neck dissection (at time of primary tumour resection) vs Therapeutic (delayed) neck dissection

Population: Adults with oral cavity cancer (tongue or floor of mouth) and clinically negative neck nodes
CD006205.PUB4 · 5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Locoregional recurrence
Locoregional recurrence: binary data unable to be pooled (different timings); 278 participants (4 trials). Three studies inconclusive, one favoured elective procedure.4 studies · 278 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Adverse events
Adverse events: 1 study (D'Cruz 2015) showed 6.6% of elective-surgery vs 3.6% of therapeutic-surgery participants reported adverse events (neck haematoma, chyle leak, oral bleeding, postoperative infection,…1 studyUngraded
Recurrence
Recurrence: no data presented (0 participants, 0 studies).0 studiesNo studies
Disease-free survival (new disease, progression or mortality)
3 years
HR 0.73 [0.25, 2.11]
500 per 1000; 250 per 1000 vs 397.1 per 1000 (159 to 768); 190 per 1000 (69 to 455)
2 studies · 571 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Total mortality
3 years
HR 0.84 [0.41, 1.72]
500 per 1000 vs 441 per 1000 (247 to 696)
2 studies · 571 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency

Elective radical (comprehensive) neck dissection vs Elective selective neck dissection

Population: Adults with oral cavity cancer
CD006205.PUB4 · 5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Adverse events
Adverse events (BHNCSG 1998): flap necrosis, wound infection, fistula, vascular rupture, haematoma, seroma, chyle fistula; 0 complications in 45 (59%) modified radical ND and 54 (75%) supraomohyoid ND; 2 vs 1…1 studyUngraded
Locoregional recurrence
Locoregional recurrence: not reported.0 studiesNo studies
Disease-free survival (new disease, progression or mortality)
5 years
HR 0.57 [0.29, 1.11]
500 per 1000; 250 per 1000 vs 326 per 1000 (182 to 537); 151 per 1000 (80 to 273)
1 study · 104 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Recurrence
5 years
RR 1.21 [0.63, 2.33]
180 per 1000 vs 213 per 1000 (118 to 370)
1 study · 143 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Total mortality
Total mortality: HR from 2 trials, unable to pool (different surgical procedures); neither trial indicated a difference; 252 participants (2 trials).2 studies · 252 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency

PET-CT following chemoradiotherapy (neck dissection only if no/incomplete response) vs Planned neck dissection before or after chemoradiotherapy

Population: Adults with oral cavity or oropharyngeal cancer with nodal disease (stage N2 or N3)
CD006205.PUB4 · 5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Total mortality
2 years
HR 0.92 [0.65, 1.31]
500 per 1000 vs 471 per 1000 (363 to 597)
1 study · 564 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Recurrence
Recurrence: not reported in a usable way (Mehanna 2017: nodal recurrence 3 vs 1; distant metastases 21 vs 23).1 studyUngraded
Adverse events
Adverse events: 22 surgical complications after neck dissection in the surveillance group vs 83 in the planned-surgery group (Mehanna 2017).1 studyUngraded
Locoregional recurrence
Locoregional recurrence: not reported in a usable way (Mehanna 2017: 2-year locoregional control 91.9% surveillance vs 91.4% planned surgery).1 studyUngraded
Disease-free survival
Disease-free survival: outcome not reported in a usable way (Mehanna 2017: disease-specific and other-cause mortality did not differ, P=0.80 and 0.41).1 studyUngraded

Surgery plus adjuvant radiotherapy vs Chemotherapy (chemoradiotherapy)

Population: Adults with oral cavity or oropharyngeal cancer
CD006205.PUB4 · 5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Disease-free survival
oral cavity
Disease-free survival: reported as statistically significant in favour of surgery (P=0.038), but no useable data (Iyer 2015).1 studyUngraded
Adverse events
Adverse events: not reported.0 studiesNo studies
Total mortality
oral cavity
Total mortality (2 years): 'For the oral cavity, survival was significantly better in patients who underwent surgery and RT compared with the CRT group' (Iyer 2015); no useable data. No GRADE rating.1 studyUngraded
Recurrence
5 years · oral cavity
Recurrence (5 years): reported as not statistically significant, but no useable data (Iyer 2015).1 studyUngraded
Locoregional recurrence
oral cavity
Locoregional recurrence: reported as not statistically significant (P=0.355), but no useable data (Iyer 2015).1 studyUngraded

Supraomohyoid neck dissection vs Modified radical neck dissection

Population: Adults with oral cavity or oropharyngeal cancer
CD006205.PUB4 · 5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Adverse events
Adverse events: significant difference in complication rates, lower for supraomohyoid (13.0% vs 21.9%, P=0.040). UW-QOL at 1 year: supraomohyoid superior for pain relief (78.8% vs 75.2%, P=0.013) and shoulder function…1 studyUngraded
Recurrence
5 years
Recurrence (5 years): outcome not reported in a usable way (Guo 2014).1 studyUngraded
Locoregional recurrence
Locoregional recurrence: outcome not reported in a usable way (Guo 2014).1 studyUngraded
Total mortality
Total mortality (2 years): 1 study, unable to use the data (Guo 2014). No GRADE rating.1 studyUngraded
Disease-free survival
Disease-free survival: outcome not reported in a usable way (Guo 2014).1 studyUngraded

Superselective neck dissection vs Selective neck dissection

Population: Adults with oral cavity cancer (tongue or floor of mouth) and clinically negative neck nodes
CD006205.PUB4 · 5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Adverse events
Adverse events: shoulder morbidity data indicated improvement and better quality of life for the super-selective group (only P values presented) (Rastogi 2018).1 studyUngraded
Total mortality
Total mortality: not reported.0 studiesNo studies
Locoregional recurrence
2.5 years
Locoregional recurrence: data not presented in a usable way; report concluded the super-selective procedure showed a lower rate of recurrence (Kaplan-Meier P<0.05) (Rastogi 2018).1 studyUngraded
Disease-free survival
Disease-free survival: not reported.0 studiesNo studies
Recurrence
Recurrence: outcome not reported in a usable way (Rastogi 2018).1 studyUngraded

Surgery plus radiotherapy vs Radiotherapy alone

Population: Adults with oral cavity or oropharyngeal cancer
CD006205.PUB3 · 2 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Adverse events
Severe acute adverse effects in both groups (subcutaneous fibrosis, telangiectasia, moderate-to-severe oedema, xerostomia, trismus, dysphagia). Subcutaneous fibrosis more prevalent in surgery plus radiotherapy group…1 studyUngraded
Total mortality
23 months (interim)
HR 0.24 [0.10, 0.59]1 study · 35 participantsUngraded

Elective neck dissection (at time of primary tumour resection) vs Therapeutic (delayed) neck dissection

Population: Adults with oral cavity cancer (tongue or floor of mouth) and clinically negative neck nodes
CD006205.PUB3 · 4 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Recurrence
Two trials reported recurrence at different sites (Vandenbrouck 1980; Yuen 2009); numbers too small to determine a difference.2 studiesUngraded
Disease-free survival
Two trials found no difference (Fakih 1989; Vandenbrouck 1980); Kligerman 1994 found benefit for elective supraomohyoid ND. Not pooled.3 studiesUngraded
Locoregional recurrence
All four trials suggested elective neck dissection reduces locoregional recurrence, but data were unsuitable for meta-analysis.4 studiesUngraded
Overall survival (or total mortality)
No meta-analysis (differences in surgery type and follow-up). Two trials (Fakih 1989; Vandenbrouck 1980) found no difference between elective radical ND and therapeutic ND; Kligerman 1994 found a benefit for elective…3 studiesUngraded

Elective radical (comprehensive) neck dissection vs Elective selective neck dissection

Population: Adults with oral cavity cancer
CD006205.PUB3 · 4 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Adverse events
BHNCSG 1998 reported flap necrosis, wound infection, fistula, vascular rupture, haematoma, seroma, chyle fistula. No complications in 45/76 (modified radical ND) and 54/72 (supraomohyoid ND); 2 vs 1 postoperative deaths.1 studyUngraded
Disease-free survival
No evidence of a difference in disease-free survival (BHNCSG 1998; Bier 1994).2 studiesUngraded
Recurrence
No evidence of a difference in disease recurrence between radical and selective neck dissection.2 studiesUngraded
Overall survival (or total mortality)
No evidence of a difference in overall survival between radical and more selective neck dissection (BHNCSG 1998; Bier 1994); no meta-analysis.2 studiesUngraded

One surgical treatment modality vs Another surgical treatment modality

Population: Adults with oral cavity or oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma
CD006205.PUB2 · 4 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Recurrent disease
No statistically significant difference in recurrent disease (total, neck nodes, new primary, distant metastases).3 studiesUngraded
Total mortality
No statistically significant difference in total mortality between the two surgical modalities (Fakih 1989a; Kligerman 1994; Vandenbrouck 1980).3 studiesUngraded
Disease-related mortality
3.5 years
RR 0.28 [0.10, 0.76]1 study · 67 participantsUngraded
Disease-free survival
No statistically significant difference in disease-free survival (Fakih 1989a; Kligerman 1994; Vandenbrouck 1980).3 studiesUngraded

Surgery plus radiotherapy vs Surgery

Population: Adults with oral cavity or oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma
CD006205.PUB2 · 4 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Harms (operative deaths, post-operative complications)
Operative deaths and post-operative complications reported; no statistically significant differences.3 studiesUngraded
Disease-free survival
1 year
RR 0.46 [0.25, 0.85]1 studyUngraded
Total mortality
No statistically significant difference in total mortality, also reported as hazard ratio (Hintz 1979b; Lawrence 1974; Terz 1981).3 studiesUngraded
Disease-related mortality
1 year
RR 0.44 [0.21, 0.93]1 studyUngraded

Radiotherapy regimen 1 (accelerated/altered-fractionation post-operative radiotherapy) vs Radiotherapy regimen 2 (conventional post-operative radiotherapy)

Population: Adults with oral cavity or oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma
CD006205.PUB2 · 2 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Death or recurrent disease (neck nodes)
HR 4.65 [1.34, 16.20]1 studyUngraded
Total mortality
No statistically significant differences for remaining outcomes including total mortality (Ang 2001; Sanguineti 2005).2 studiesUngraded

Surgery plus radiotherapy plus chemotherapy vs Surgery plus radiotherapy

Population: Adults with oral cavity or oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma
CD006205.PUB2 · 4 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Recurrent disease
Recurrent disease (Martin 1990): no statistically significant benefit of adding cisplatin/5-FU.1 studyUngraded
Total mortality
Total mortality (HR) in 4 trials (Paccagnella 1994; Rentschler 1987; Schuller 1988; Volling 1999): no statistically significant results.4 studiesUngraded
Disease-free survival (death or recurrent disease)
HR 0.55 [0.32, 0.94]1 studyUngraded
Harms (death due to treatment)
Death due to treatment (Schuller 1988): no statistically significant difference between arms.1 studyUngraded

Radiotherapy plus chemotherapy vs Radiotherapy

Population: Adults with oral cavity or oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma
CD006205.PUB2 · 4 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Recurrent disease
5 years
HR 0.64 [0.44, 0.93]1 studyUngraded
Disease-free survival (death or recurrent disease)
HR 0.77 [0.65, 0.91]2 studiesUngraded
Adverse events (acute grade 3+)
Acute adverse effects (grade 3+) higher in the combined-therapy arm (Bernier 2004 41% vs 21%; Cooper 2004 77% vs 34%, P<0.001); 4 treatment-related deaths (Cooper 2004).2 studiesUngraded
Total mortality
HR 0.79 [0.65, 0.95]2 studiesUngraded

Surgery plus radiotherapy plus chemotherapy vs Surgery

Population: Adults with oral cavity or oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma
CD006205.PUB2 · 1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Total mortality (survival)
Mohr 1994 (limited data, not in analyses) reported significantly better survival with surgery plus radio-chemotherapy (P<0.05; +4.5% at 1 yr, +8.3% at 2 yr, +20% at 3 yr, interim); moderate-to-high risk of bias; no…1 studyUngraded

Surgery plus chemotherapy vs Surgery

Population: Adults with oral cavity or oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma
CD006205.PUB2 · 2 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Total mortality
No statistically significant differences for any outcome (Licitra 2003; Richard 1991); Luboinski 1985 (limited) survival P=0.076.2 studiesUngraded
Disease-free survival
No statistically significant difference in disease-free survival (Licitra 2003; Richard 1991).2 studiesUngraded

Chemotherapy vs No chemotherapy

Population: Adults with oral cavity or oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma
CD006205.PUB2 · 3 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Recurrent disease
1 year
RR 0.52 [0.30, 0.91]1 studyUngraded
Disease-free survival
1-2 years
RR 1.55 [1.11, 2.16]1 studyUngraded
Total mortality
No statistically significant differences for total mortality (Rao 1991; Szpirglas 1978) or disease-related mortality (Rao 1991).2 studiesUngraded

Surgery plus radiotherapy vs Radiotherapy alone

Population: Adults with oral cavity or oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma
CD006205.PUB2 · 1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Total mortality
23 months (interim)
HR 0.24 [0.10, 0.59]1 study · 35 participantsUngraded

Surgery plus chemotherapy vs Surgery plus radiotherapy

Population: Adults with oral cavity or oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma
CD006205.PUB2 · 2 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Total mortality
No statistically significant difference in total mortality (Kaplan-Meier log-rank P=0.57) (Szabo 1999).1 studyUngraded
Quality of life
Post-operative quality of life appeared 'slightly more favourable' in the intra-arterial chemotherapy group than the radiotherapy group (Szabo 1999).1 studyUngraded

Surgery plus immunotherapy/biotherapy vs Surgery

Population: Adults with oral cavity or oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma
CD006205.PUB2 · 1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Total mortality
No statistically significant results for total mortality or death/recurrent disease (Bier 1981; Neifeld 1985).2 studiesUngraded

Surgery plus radiotherapy plus immunotherapy/biotherapy vs Surgery plus radiotherapy

Population: Adults with oral cavity or oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma
CD006205.PUB2 · 3 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Total mortality
No statistically significant difference in total mortality or disease-related mortality (De Stefani 2002).1 studyUngraded
Recurrent disease
3 years
RR 1.56 [1.09, 2.23]1 studyUngraded
Disease-free survival
3 years
RR 1.60 [1.23, 2.08]1 studyUngraded

One surgical treatment modality vs Another surgical treatment modality

Population: Patients with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx
CD006205 · 1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Outcome NR
Protocol (no studies included). Planned comparison of one surgical treatment modality of the primary tumour versus another (e.g. scalpel-based surgery, laser cutting/ablation, harmonic scalpel).NRNo studies

Surgery vs Radiotherapy alone

Population: Patients with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx
CD006205 · 1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Outcome NR
Protocol (no studies included). Planned comparison of surgery versus radiotherapy.NRNo studies

Surgery vs Chemotherapy

Population: Patients with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx
CD006205 · 1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Outcome NR
Protocol (no studies included). Planned comparison of surgery versus chemotherapy.NRNo studies

Surgery vs Immunotherapy/biotherapy

Population: Patients with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx
CD006205 · 1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Outcome NR
Protocol (no studies included). Planned comparison of surgery versus immunotherapy/biotherapy.NRNo studies

Surgery vs Other modality (cryotherapy, radiofrequency ablation, photodynamic therapy, electroporation, or complementary therapy)

Population: Patients with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx
CD006205 · 1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Outcome NR
Protocol (no studies included). Planned comparison of surgery versus other modalities (cryotherapy, radiofrequency ablation, photodynamic therapy, electroporation, or complementary therapies).NRNo studies