Cochrane · intervention · CD005514
Occlusal splints for treating sleep bruxism (tooth grinding)
Macedo, CR, Silva, AB, Machado, MAC, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2007 · Cochrane Library
Full textEvery question was extracted from the full review (methods and results), not only its Summary of Findings table.
Questions
22
current version
GRADE rated
0
No studies
3
Included studies
5
as reported
No studies 3 · 13.6%Ungraded 19 · 86.4%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Review question
| Element | Planned (methods) | Found (results) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | All participants with sleep bruxism (tooth grinding or clenching); children (greater than 1 year old) and adults; diagnostic criteria clinical, polysomnographic, or both. Clinical: complaint of tooth grinding or clenching during sleep plus one or more of abnormal tooth wear, tooth grinding sounds during sleep, jaw muscle discomfort. Polysomnographic cut-offs: more than 4 bruxism episodes per hour; more than 6 bruxism bursts per episode or 25 bursts per hour of sleep; at least 2 episodes with grinding sounds. Exclusion: comorbidity such as movement disorders, neurological and psychiatric diseases | People with sleep bruxism (5 RCTs); 1 study in children aged 3 to 5 years and 4 studies in adults (majority women) |
| Intervention | Occlusal splint | Occlusal splint (n=5) |
| Comparison | Placebo; No treatment; Other types of appliances (palatal splint); Pharmacological interventions (benzodiazepine, anticonvulsants, beta blockers, dopamine agents, antidepressants, botulin toxin A and B, analgesics); Behaviour therapy (sleep hygiene, relaxation to control stress, psychotherapy, hypnosis, biofeedback) | Palatal splint (n=2); Transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (n=1); No treatment (n=1); Mandibular advancement device (n=1) |
| Outcomes | Primary: indexes of bruxism motor activity (masseter EMG with polysomnographic audio-video recordings): frequency of sleep bruxism episodes per hour of sleep and number of episodes with grinding noise. Secondary: tooth wear; tooth restoration failure; quality of life; adherence; adverse events; temporomandibular joint pain (VAS); clicking (joint sound); jaw movement limitation; myofascial pain (VAS); headaches; stress level; mood factors; anxiety; depression; sleep variables (REM sleep latency, efficiency, arousals index, stages, sleep latency, wake after sleep onset, total sleep time); masseteric EMG activity; apnoea-hypopnoea index | Number of bruxism episodes per hour of sleep (n=2); Arousal index (n=2); Total sleep time (n=1); Episodes with grinding noise (n=1); Awakenings per hour (n=1); Sleep efficiency (n=1); Headaches (n=1); Pain in TMJ (n=1); Clicks TMJ oral opening and closing (n=1); Clicks TMJ oral opening or closing (n=1); Increase in the size of wear facets, canine teeth (n=1); Preference (n=2); Comfort (n=2); Pain during the night (n=1); Oral dryness (n=1) |
| Study designs | Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in which occlusal splint was compared concurrently to no treatment, pharmacological interventions, any other occlusal appliances, placebo, or behaviour therapy; quasi-randomised trials (alternation, date of birth, record number) included and subject to a sensitivity analysis | RCT (n=4); quasi-RCT (n=1); 3 cross-over and 2 parallel-group designs |
| Timing | Not reported | Studies performed over 2 weeks to 2 months; 1 study with 6 months of follow up |
Search date: 2007-05. Databases: Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register; The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); MEDLINE; EMBASE; LILACS; Dissertation, Theses and Abstracts; Biblioteca Brasileira de Odontologia
Questions and results
Current version onlyOcclusal splint vs Placebo
Population: People with sleep bruxism (tooth grinding or clenching); children (greater than 1 year old) and adults; diagnosis clinical, polysomnographic, or both
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Outcome NR | Placebo remained a planned comparator in the review methods (Types of interventions), but none of the five included trials compared occlusal splint with placebo; no eligible study. | 0 studies | No studies |
Occlusal splint vs No treatment
Population: People with sleep bruxism (tooth grinding or clenching); children (greater than 1 year old) and adults; diagnosis clinical, polysomnographic, or both
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Increase in the size of wear facets (canine teeth) 6 months of follow up · children (age 3 to 5 years) | RR 0.20 [0.03, 1.15] | 1 study | Ungraded |
Increase in the size of wear facets (canine teeth) children (age 3 to 5 years) | RR 0.20 [0.03, 1.15] | 1 study | Ungraded |
Occlusal splint vs Palatal splint
Population: People with sleep bruxism (tooth grinding or clenching); children (greater than 1 year old) and adults; diagnosis clinical, polysomnographic, or both
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Episodes with grinding noise | MD 0.90 [-10.19, 11.99] | 1 study | Ungraded |
Comfort (visual analogue scale) | Occlusal splint versus palatal splint, comfort (median VAS 0 to 100 mm) (Dube 2004): occlusal splint 79.3 (SD 4.7) mm versus palatal splint 77.8 (8.1) mm; both rated as equally comfortable. No participant reported dry… | 1 study | Ungraded |
Preference (device preferred by participants) | Occlusal splint versus palatal splint, preference (Dube 2004): all participants preferred the palatal splint rather than the occlusal splint; 71% felt the occlusal splint offered greater protection for their teeth. At… | 1 study | Ungraded |
Awakenings per hour | MD 0.40 [-2.51, 3.31] | 1 study | Ungraded |
Arousal index | MD 1.22 [-3.61, 6.05] | 2 studies · 39 participants | Ungraded |
Sleep efficiency (%) | MD -2.40 [-8.36, 3.56] | 1 study | Ungraded |
Total sleep time (min) | MD -8.60 [-96.17, 78.97] | 1 study | Ungraded |
Number of bruxism episodes per hour of sleep (Epi/h) | MD 0.54 [-10.95, 12.93] | 1 study | Ungraded |
Occlusal splint vs Pharmacological interventions (benzodiazepines, anticonvulsants, beta blockers, dopamine agents, antidepressants, botulinum toxin A and B, analgesics)
Population: People with sleep bruxism (tooth grinding or clenching); children (greater than 1 year old) and adults; diagnosis clinical, polysomnographic, or both
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Outcome NR | Pharmacological interventions remained a planned comparator, but no included trial compared occlusal splint with any drug; no eligible study. | 0 studies | No studies |
Occlusal splint vs Behaviour therapy (sleep hygiene, relaxation, psychotherapy, hypnosis, biofeedback)
Population: People with sleep bruxism (tooth grinding or clenching); children (greater than 1 year old) and adults; diagnosis clinical, polysomnographic, or both
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Outcome NR | Behaviour therapy remained a planned comparator, but no included trial compared occlusal splint with behaviour therapy; no eligible study. | 0 studies | No studies |
Occlusal splint vs Transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS)
Population: People with sleep bruxism (tooth grinding or clenching); children (greater than 1 year old) and adults; diagnosis clinical, polysomnographic, or both
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Pain in temporomandibular joint (TMJ) | Occlusal splint versus TENS, pain in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) (Alvarez-Arenal 2002): the event did not occur in either group, so the risk ratio was not estimable. | 1 study | Ungraded |
Clicks in TMJ on oral opening and closing | RR 0.60 [0.19, 1.92] | 1 study | Ungraded |
Headaches | Occlusal splint versus TENS, headaches (Alvarez-Arenal 2002): the event did not occur in either group, so the risk ratio was not estimable (Risk Ratio, M-H, Fixed, 95% CI; subtotals only). | 1 study | Ungraded |
Clicks in TMJ on oral opening or closing | RR 1.00 [0.33, 3.02] | 1 study | Ungraded |
Occlusal splint vs Mandibular advancement device
Population: People with sleep bruxism (tooth grinding or clenching); children (greater than 1 year old) and adults; diagnosis clinical, polysomnographic, or both
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Sleep bruxism episodes per hour of sleep MAD in 75% advancement (MAD max) | MD 5.9 | 1 study | Ungraded |
Oral dryness (adverse effect) | Occlusal splint versus mandibular advancement device (Landry 2006): oral dryness occurred with the MAD min configuration (7/13). | 1 study | Ungraded |
Comfort (visual analogue scale) | Occlusal splint versus mandibular advancement device, comfort (median VAS 0 to 100 mm) (Landry 2006): occlusal splint 79 mm, MAD free 41 mm, MAD min 15 mm, MAD max 12 mm; the occlusal splint was rated most comfortable. | 1 study | Ungraded |
Preference (device preferred by participants) | Occlusal splint versus mandibular advancement device, preference (Landry 2006): 12 of 13 participants preferred the occlusal splint over the mandibular advancement device (MAD free); a higher proportion of benefitted… | 1 study | Ungraded |
Pain during the night (adverse effect) | Occlusal splint versus mandibular advancement device (Landry 2006): pain during the night occurred with the MAD max and MAD min configurations (8/13). | 1 study | Ungraded |
Occlusal splint vs Placebo
Population: People with sleep bruxism (tooth grinding or clenching); children (greater than 1 year old) and adults; diagnosis clinical, polysomnographic, or both
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Outcome NR | Protocol (2005): occlusal splint versus placebo was a planned comparison; no studies (protocol only, no included trials). | 0 studies | No studies |
Occlusal splint vs No treatment
Population: People with sleep bruxism (tooth grinding or clenching); children (greater than 1 year old) and adults; diagnosis clinical, polysomnographic, or both
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Outcome NR | Protocol (2005): occlusal splint versus no treatment was a planned comparison; no studies (protocol only, no included trials). | 0 studies | No studies |
Occlusal splint vs Other types of occlusal appliances (mouth guard, bite splint, splint, anterior tooth device, dental occlusal)
Population: People with sleep bruxism (tooth grinding or clenching); children (greater than 1 year old) and adults; diagnosis clinical, polysomnographic, or both
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Outcome NR | Protocol (2005): occlusal splint versus other types of appliances (mouth guard, bite splint, splint, anterior tooth device, dental occlusal) was a planned comparison; no studies (protocol only). | 0 studies | No studies |
Occlusal splint vs Pharmacological interventions (benzodiazepines, anticonvulsants, beta blockers, dopamine agents, antidepressants, botulinum toxin A and B, analgesics)
Population: People with sleep bruxism (tooth grinding or clenching); children (greater than 1 year old) and adults; diagnosis clinical, polysomnographic, or both
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Outcome NR | Protocol (2005): occlusal splint versus pharmacological interventions was a planned comparison; no studies (protocol only). | 0 studies | No studies |
Occlusal splint vs Behaviour therapy (sleep hygiene, relaxation, psychotherapy, hypnosis, biofeedback)
Population: People with sleep bruxism (tooth grinding or clenching); children (greater than 1 year old) and adults; diagnosis clinical, polysomnographic, or both
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Outcome NR | Protocol (2005): occlusal splint versus behaviour therapy was a planned comparison; no studies (protocol only). | 0 studies | No studies |