What do systematic reviews say?

Visual interventions vs control

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Non‐pharmacological interventions for spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other non‐progressive brain… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Visual interventions vs control

It is very uncertain whether visual interventions changes activities of daily living: effects persisting at least 1 month post… compared with any control (very low certainty).

• Non‐pharmacological interventions for spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other non‐progressive brain… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 55 participants
  Very low
• Non‐pharmacological interventions for spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other non‐progressive brain… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  3 studies · 75 participants
  Very low

Visual interventions vs control

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Non‐pharmacological interventions for spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other non‐progressive brain… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Visual interventions vs control

It is very uncertain whether visual interventions changes neglect outcomes: effects persisting at least 1 month post… compared with any control (very low certainty).

• Non‐pharmacological interventions for spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other non‐progressive brain… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  SMD 0.14
  5 studies · 98 participants
  Very low

Visual interventions vs control

It is very uncertain whether visual interventions changes neglect outcomes: immediate effects compared with any control (very low certainty).

• Non‐pharmacological interventions for spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other non‐progressive brain… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  SMD 0.08
  7 studies · 142 participants
  Very low

Visual interventions vs control

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Non‐pharmacological interventions for spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other non‐progressive brain… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Summary of findings: Restitutive interventions vs control

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Restitutive interventions changes visual field (TAP border position in degrees of visual angle from… compared with control (very low certainty).

• Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  MD 1.02
  1 study · 19 participants
  Very low

Summary of findings: Compensative interventions vs control

Summary of findings: Compensative interventions may leads to higher quality of life (National Eye Institute Visual Function… compared with control (low certainty).

• Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  MD 9.36 [3.1, 15.62]
  2 studies · 96 participants
  Low

Summary of findings: Substitutive interventions vs control

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Substitutive interventions changes visual field (change in visual field area & change in error scores,… compared with control (very low certainty).

• Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  SMD 0.12 [0.44, 1.8]
  2 studies · 85 participants
  Very low

Summary of findings: Substitutive interventions vs control

Summary of findings: Substitutive interventions showed no clear difference in quality of life (Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ‐25)) After… compared with control (low certainty).

• Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  MD 8.4
  1 study · 43 participants
  Low

Summary of findings: Compensative interventions vs control

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Compensative interventions changes visual field (Functional field score and relative change in visual… compared with control (very low certainty).

• Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 95 participants
  Very low

Summary of findings: Assessment/screening interventions vs control

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Workplace interventions vs usual care

• Workplace interventions to prevent work disability in workers on sick leave 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  5 studies · 531 participants
  High

Non‐pharmaceutical interventions vs control

Non‐pharmaceutical interventions showed no clear difference in short‐term visual acuity between 20/20 and 20/60 at end of… compared with control (low certainty).

• Medical interventions for traumatic hyphema 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.82 [0.67, 1]
  1 study · 46 participants
  Low
• Medical interventions for traumatic hyphema 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.1 [0.84, 1.44]
  1 study · 52 participants
  Low

Non‐pharmaceutical interventions vs control

Non‐pharmaceutical interventions showed no clear difference in final visual acuity between 20/20 and 20/50; monocular vs binocular… compared with control (low certainty).

• Medical interventions for traumatic hyphema 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.95 [0.77, 1.18]
  1 study · 53 participants
  Low

Summary of findings: Restitutive interventions vs control

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Summary of findings: Restitutive interventions vs control

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Summary of findings: Restitutive interventions vs control

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Summary of findings: Restitutive interventions vs control

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Summary of findings: Restitutive interventions vs control

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Restitutive interventions changes quality of life (improved or not improved ‐ derived from percentage… compared with control (very low certainty).

• Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  OR 13 [2.07, 81.48]
  1 study · 30 participants
  Very low