Cochrane · systematic review · CD006955

Workplace interventions to prevent work disability in workers on sick leave

van Vilsteren, M, van Oostrom, SH, de Vet, HCW, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2015 · Cochrane Library

Work2 versionsAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
7
current version
GRADE rated
7
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 2 · 28.6%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 3 · 42.9%High 2 · 28.6%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Show all 2 versions

Workplace interventions compared to Usual care for Workers on sick leave

Population: Workers on sick leave
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Time until first RTW Risk at return to work
Workplace interventions vs Usual care
HR 1.55 [1.2, 2.01]5 studies · 608 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Time until lasting RTW Risk at return to work
Workplace interventions vs Usual care
HR 1.07 [0.72, 1.57]6 studies · 635 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
Cumulative duration of sickness absence Days. Scale from: 0 to 365. Scale from: 0 to 365.
Workplace interventions vs Usual care
no estimate extracted8 studies · 1164 participantsHigh
Recurrences Risk at recurrences of sick leave
Workplace interventions vs Usual care
HR 0.42 [0.21, 0.82]1 study · 99 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision
Functional status Roland disability questionnaire. outcome was measured on different scales in different studies. Scale from: 0 to 24.
Workplace interventions vs Usual care
no estimate extracted6 studies · 628 participantsModerate
Downgraded: inconsistency
Depression Depression Anxiety Stress scale, and PHQ‐9 depression scale
Workplace interventions vs Usual care
no estimate extracted4 studies · 133 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Pain Visual Analogue Scale
Workplace interventions vs Usual care
no estimate extracted5 studies · 531 participantsHigh