Vaginal procedure vs sacral colpopexy (vault prolapse)
Vaginal procedure probably leads to higher awareness of prolapse compared with sacral colpopexy (vault prolapse) (moderate certainty).
- RR 2.31 [1.27, 4.21]4 studies · 346 participantsModerate
Vaginal procedure probably leads to higher awareness of prolapse compared with sacral colpopexy (vault prolapse) (moderate certainty).
Vaginal procedure probably leads to higher surgery for recurrent prolapse compared with sacral colpopexy (vault prolapse) (moderate certainty).
Vaginal procedure probably leads to higher prolapse on examination (Stage 2 or above) ‐ Any recurrent prolapse compared with sacral colpopexy (vault prolapse) (moderate certainty).
Vaginal procedure showed no clear difference in intraoperative Visceral injury compared with sacral colpopexy (vault prolapse) (moderate certainty).
Vaginal procedure probably leads to higher bladder Function ‐ Stress incontinence compared with sacral colpopexy (vault prolapse) (moderate certainty).
Vaginal procedure showed no clear difference in painful intercourse ‐ Dyspareunia compared with sacral colpopexy (vault prolapse) (low certainty).
Vaginal POP surgery with concomitant continence procedure probably leads to lower vaginal POP surgery with or without concomitant continence surgery:… compared with no concomitant continence procedure (moderate certainty).
Vaginal or abdominal POP surgery with concomitant continence procedure showed no clear difference in vaginal POP surgery with or without concomitant continence surgery:… compared with no concomitant continence procedure (moderate certainty).
Vaginal or abdominal POP surgery with concomitant continence procedure showed no clear difference in abdominal POP surgery with or without concomitant continence… compared with no concomitant continence procedure (low certainty).
POP surgery with concomitant continence procedure probably leads to lower vaginal POP surgery with vs without MUS compared with no concomitant continence procedure (moderate certainty).
POP surgery with concomitant continence procedure showed no clear difference in vaginal POP surgery with concomitant vs delayed continence surgery:… compared with no concomitant continence procedure (moderate certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
Monitoring ovarian stimulation by transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) only showed no clear difference in clinical pregnancy per woman compared with monitoring with TVUS plus serum estradiol (low certainty).
Monitoring ovarian stimulation by transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) only showed no clear difference in OHSS rate (mild, moderate or severe) per woman compared with monitoring with TVUS plus serum estradiol (low certainty).
Monitoring ovarian stimulation by transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) only showed no clear difference in cycle cancellation rate per woman compared with monitoring with TVUS plus serum estradiol (low certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
Sublingual misoprostol showed no clear difference in women's dissatisfaction with the procedure compared with vaginal misoprostol (moderate certainty).