Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

111 questions · 115 findings · 14 reviews · Developmental, Psychosocial and Learning Problems · Headline outcomes only

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 16 · 13.9%GRADE not reported 4 · 3.5%Very low 40 · 34.8%Low 35 · 30.4%Moderate 20 · 17.4%High 0 · 0%

Phonics training vs control (no training or alternative training)

Mixed/regular word reading accuracy · English‐speaking poor readers

1 finding from 1 review

Phonics training for English‐speaking poor readers 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
11 studies · 701 participants
Low

Phonics training vs control (no training or alternative training)

Non‐word reading accuracy · English‐speaking poor readers

1 finding from 1 review

Phonics training for English‐speaking poor readers 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
10 studies · 682 participants
Low

Phonics training vs control (no training or alternative training)

Irregular word reading accuracy · English‐speaking poor readers

1 finding from 1 review

Phonics training for English‐speaking poor readers 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 294 participants
Moderate

Phonics training vs control (no training or alternative training)

Mixed/regular word reading fluency · English‐speaking poor readers

1 finding from 1 review

Phonics training for English‐speaking poor readers 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 224 participants
Moderate

Phonics training vs control (no training or alternative training)

Non‐word reading fluency · English‐speaking poor readers

1 finding from 1 review

Phonics training for English‐speaking poor readers 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 188 participants
Moderate

Phonics training vs control (no training or alternative training)

Reading comprehension · English‐speaking poor readers

1 finding from 1 review

Phonics training for English‐speaking poor readers 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
5 studies · 343 participants
Low

Phonics training vs control (no training or alternative training)

Spelling · English‐speaking poor readers

1 finding from 1 review

Phonics training for English‐speaking poor readers 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 158 participants
Low

Parent training vs control

Change in duration of crying (not reported) · infants with colic defined by recognised criteria

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Parent training programmes for managing infantile colic 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Parent training vs control

Crying time at completion Measured in: minutes/day · infants with colic defined by recognised criteria

1 finding from 1 review

Parent training programmes for managing infantile colic 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 157 participants
Low

Parent training vs control

Adverse effects (not reported) · infants with colic defined by recognised criteria

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Parent training programmes for managing infantile colic 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Parent training vs treatment

Safe home practices · people with intellectual disability

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Parent training interventions for parents with intellectual disability 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Parent training vs treatment

Recognising dangers · people with intellectual disability

1 finding from 1 review

Parent training interventions for parents with intellectual disability 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 30 participants
Very low

Parent training vs treatment

Identifying precautions · people with intellectual disability

1 finding from 1 review

Parent training interventions for parents with intellectual disability 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 30 participants
Very low

Parent training vs treatment

Home precautions · people with intellectual disability

2 findings from 1 review

Parent training interventions for parents with intellectual disability 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 30 participants
Very low
Parent training interventions for parents with intellectual disability 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 22 participants
Very low

Parent training vs treatment

Child health comprehension · people with intellectual disability

1 finding from 1 review

Parent training interventions for parents with intellectual disability 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 30 participants
Very low

Parent training vs treatment

Symptom recognition · people with intellectual disability

1 finding from 1 review

Parent training interventions for parents with intellectual disability 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 30 participants
Very low

Parent training vs treatment

Parent‐child interaction · people with intellectual disability

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Parent training interventions for parents with intellectual disability 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Parent training vs treatment

Maternal‐child interaction · people with intellectual disability

1 finding from 1 review

Parent training interventions for parents with intellectual disability 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 40 participants
Very low

Mechanically assisted walking training with body weight support vs no walking training

Mobility · children with cerebral palsy classified within GMFCS Levels I to V and between 3 and 18 years of age

1 finding from 1 review

Mechanically assisted walking training for walking, participation, and quality of life in children with cerebral palsy 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
7 studies · 161 participants
Moderate

Mechanically assisted walking training with body weight support vs no walking training

Activity Gross motor function · children with cerebral palsy classified within GMFCS Levels I to V and between 3 and 18 years of age

1 finding from 1 review

Mechanically assisted walking training for walking, participation, and quality of life in children with cerebral palsy 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 58 participants
Low