Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

66 questions · 68 findings · 7 reviews

No studies found 34 · 50%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 23 · 33.8%Low 8 · 11.8%Moderate 3 · 4.4%High 0 · 0%

Antiseptic mouthwash (e.g. chlorhexidine) vs Another topical agent or placebo

Adverse effects of long‐term use of available topical agents · HIV‐infected adults (> 13 years of age, per CDC) with one or more painful intraoral aphthous ulcers

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review
  • No studies were included in this review. A total of 233 abstracts were retrieved; 25 were selected as potentially eligible but all were excluded (10 reported systemic rather than topical treatment; 3 non‐RCTs; 6…
    0 studies
    No studies found

Silver‐based antiseptics vs topical antibiotics

Time to complete healing · people with burns

Silver‐based antiseptics showed no clear difference in wound healing: time to complete healing (time‐to‐event data) compared with topical antibiotics (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review
  • Antiseptics for burns 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
    HR 1.25 [0.94, 1.67]
    3 studies · 259 participants
    Low

Silver‐based antiseptics vs topical antibiotics

Wound healing · people with burns

Silver‐based antiseptics showed no clear difference in wound healing (mean time to healing) compared with topical antibiotics (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review
  • Antiseptics for burns 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
    no estimate extracted
    10 studies · 1085 participants
    Low

Silver‐based antiseptics vs topical antibiotics

Number of wounds healed · people with burns

Silver‐based antiseptics showed no clear difference in wound healing (number of healing events) compared with topical antibiotics (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review
  • Antiseptics for burns 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
    RR 1.17 [1, 1.37]
    5 studies · 408 participants
    Low