Surgery vs LNG‐IUS
Surgery showed no clear difference in satisfaction rate: surgery versus LNG‐IUS Endometrial ablation… compared with LNG‐IUS (low certainty).
- RR 0.93 [0.81, 1.08]2 studies · 117 participantsLow
Surgery showed no clear difference in satisfaction rate: surgery versus LNG‐IUS Endometrial ablation… compared with LNG‐IUS (low certainty).
Surgery showed no clear difference in satisfaction rate: surgery versus LNG‐IUS Endometrial ablation… compared with LNG‐IUS (low certainty).
Pelvic floor muscle training before and after prolapse surgery showed no clear difference in repeat surgery (or pessary) for recurrent prolapse compared with no training (low certainty).
Vaginal surgery with mesh showed no clear difference in surgery for recurrent prolapse compared with without mesh (moderate certainty).
Surgery probably leads to higher control of bleeding (cure or improvement to acceptable level) At 4… compared with oral medication (moderate certainty).
Surgery probably leads to lower proportion of women with adverse events Endometrial ablation versus… compared with LNG‐IUS (moderate certainty).
Surgery probably leads to higher overall satisfaction with treatment At 2 years compared with oral medication (moderate certainty).
It is very uncertain whether surgery changes overall satisfaction with treatment At 5 years compared with oral medication (very low certainty).
Surgery probably leads to lower adverse events at 4 months compared with oral medication (moderate certainty).
Surgery probably leads to higher objective control of bleeding: menstrual loss under 80 ml per cycle… compared with LNG‐IUS (moderate certainty).
Surgery may leads to higher subjective control of bleeding: PBAC no more than 75 per cycle… compared with LNG‐IUS (low certainty).
Vaginal POP surgery with armed mesh may leads to higher one type of POP surgery vs another: armed anterior mesh vs anterior… compared with anterior native tissue repair (low certainty).
POP surgery with concomitant continence procedure probably leads to lower vaginal POP surgery with vs without MUS compared with no concomitant continence procedure (moderate certainty).
POP surgery with concomitant continence procedure showed no clear difference in vaginal POP surgery with concomitant vs delayed continence surgery:… compared with no concomitant continence procedure (moderate certainty).
POP surgery with concomitant continence procedure showed no clear difference in abdominal POP surgery with vs without concomitant continence… compared with no concomitant continence procedure (moderate certainty).
Vaginal POP surgery with concomitant continence procedure probably leads to lower vaginal POP surgery with or without concomitant continence surgery:… compared with no concomitant continence procedure (moderate certainty).
Vaginal or abdominal POP surgery with concomitant continence procedure showed no clear difference in vaginal POP surgery with or without concomitant continence surgery:… compared with no concomitant continence procedure (moderate certainty).
Vaginal or abdominal POP surgery with concomitant continence procedure showed no clear difference in abdominal POP surgery with or without concomitant continence… compared with no concomitant continence procedure (low certainty).
Excisional surgery may leads to higher subsequent spontaneous conception compared with ablative surgery (low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether excisional surgery changes pregnancy rate after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation compared with ablative surgery (very low certainty).