Uptake of screening test ‐ Numerical and categorised risk combined Number of participants taking up the test · patients with informed decision making about taking screening tests
Personalised risk communication may leads to higher uptake of screening test ‐ Numerical and categorised risk combined… compared with general risk information (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Knowledge regarding screening test/condition concerned ‐ calculated risk score (numerical) versus general information various continuous scales · patients with informed decision making about taking screening tests
1 finding from 1 review
Knowledge regarding screening test/condition concerned ‐ calculated risk score (categorised) versus general information various continuous scales · patients with informed decision making about taking screening tests
1 finding from 1 review
Knowledge regarding screening test/condition concerned ‐ personal risk factor list versus general information various continuous scales · patients with informed decision making about taking screening tests
1 finding from 1 review
Knowledge regarding screening test/condition concerned ‐ calculated risk score (numerical) versus general information proportion with good knowledge · patients with informed decision making about taking screening tests
Personalised risk communication leads to higher knowledge regarding screening test/condition concerned ‐ calculated… compared with general risk information (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Knowledge regarding screening test / condition concerned ‐ personal risk factor list v general information proportion with good knowledge · patients with informed decision making about taking screening tests
Personalised risk communication leads to higher knowledge regarding screening test / condition concerned ‐ personal… compared with general risk information (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Overall effect (i.e. irrespective of screening result) · Pregnant women undergoing prenatal serum screening for Down syndrome
1 finding from 1 review
Health behaviour – Time point a: medium‐term (up to 6 months post‐intervention) Any cancer screening uptake · migrants
Culturally and literacy adapted audio‐/visual education without… showed no clear difference in health behaviour – Time point a: medium‐term (up to 6 months… compared with written information on the same topic (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Health behaviour – Cervical cancer screening · migrants
It is very uncertain whether culturally and literacy adapted audio‐/visual education without… changes health behaviour – Cervical cancer screening compared with another culturally and literacy adapted audio‐/visual education… (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Health service utilization ‐ attendance for: breast cancer screening, cervical screening, voluntary medical male circumcision, HPV or HBV vaccination · Adults (age over 24 years)
Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices showed no clear difference in health service utilization ‐ attendance for: breast cancer… compared with non‐digital, targeted communication (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Behavioural outcome: breast cancer screening Multimodal/complex intervention versus usual care at 12 months · participants at risk for breast, colorectal or cervical cancer; or osteoporosis
The intervention leads to higher behavioural outcome: breast cancer screening Multimodal/complex… (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Behavioural outcome: breast cancer screening IVR versus enhanced usual care at median · participants at risk for breast, colorectal or cervical cancer; or osteoporosis
The intervention showed no clear difference in behavioural outcome: breast cancer screening IVR versus enhanced… (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Behavioural outcome: colorectal cancer screening Multimodal/complex intervention versus usual care at median · participants at risk for breast, colorectal or cervical cancer; or osteoporosis
The intervention leads to higher behavioural outcome: colorectal cancer screening Multimodal/complex… (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Behavioural outcome: colorectal cancer screening IVR versus usual care at 6‐month · participants at risk for breast, colorectal or cervical cancer; or osteoporosis
The intervention probably leads to higher behavioural outcome: colorectal cancer screening IVR versus usual… (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Behavioural outcome: colorectal cancer screening IVR, unidirectional ATCS versus usual care or letter at longer (9‐12 months) · participants at risk for breast, colorectal or cervical cancer; or osteoporosis
The intervention showed no clear difference in behavioural outcome: colorectal cancer screening IVR, unidirectional… (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Behavioural outcome: cervical cancer screening ATCS Plus versus control (no calls) at 3 month · participants at risk for breast, colorectal or cervical cancer; or osteoporosis
1 finding from 1 review
Health outcomes: Drug misuse and dependence CAGE screening tool. Scale from 0 to 4. Higher score indicates greater probability of drug misuse or dependence · patients taking prescribed and over‐the‐counter medications or their carers
1 finding from 1 review
Health service outcome: uptake of preventive screening · Adultsa
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Perception ‐ screening message (measured as rating on a scale of perceived effectiveness) · consumers
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Persuasiveness ‐ screening message (measured as a hypothetical decision or intention or willingness to adopt an intervention) · consumers
1 finding from 1 review