It is very uncertain whether SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FOR DECOMPRESSION changes pain Long‐term (≥ 12 months) Pain scores converted to 0 to 100 scale… compared with FUSION (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FOR DECOMPRESSION changes disability Long‐term (≥ 12 months) Disability scores converted to 0… compared with FUSION (very low certainty).
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FOR DECOMPRESSION showed no clear difference in pain Long‐term (≥ 12 months) Pain scores converted to 0 to 100 scale… compared with INTERSPINOUS SPACERS (moderate certainty).
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FOR DECOMPRESSION showed no clear difference in disability Long‐term (≥ 12 months) Disability scores converted to 0… compared with INTERSPINOUS SPACERS (low certainty).
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FOR DECOMPRESSION leads to lower reoperations Number of patients requiring a revision surgery compared with INTERSPINOUS SPACERS (high certainty).
It is very uncertain whether SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FOR DECOMPRESSION changes operation time Duration of operation reported in minutes compared with FUSION (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FOR DECOMPRESSION changes blood loss Amount of perioperative blood loss reported in L compared with FUSION (very low certainty).
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FOR DECOMPRESSION showed no clear difference in reoperations Number of patients requiring a revision surgery compared with FUSION (moderate certainty).
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FOR DECOMPRESSION may leads to higher operation time Duration of operation reported in minutes compared with INTERSPINOUS SPACERS (low certainty).
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FOR DECOMPRESSION showed no clear difference in blood loss Amount of perioperative blood loss reported in mL compared with INTERSPINOUS SPACERS (low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: bilateral laminotomy changes standardized Disability Index (0 to 100) Bilateral laminotomy… compared with conventional laminectomy (very low certainty).
Summary of findings: unilateral laminotomy showed no clear difference in standardised Disability Index (0 to 100) Unilateral laminotomy… compared with conventional laminectomy (low certainty).
Summary of findings: split‐spinous process laminotomy showed no clear difference in standardised Disability Index (0 to 100) Split‐spinous process… compared with conventional laminectomy (low certainty).
Summary of findings: bilateral laminotomy may leads to higher satisfactory recovery Bilateral laminotomy compared with… compared with conventional laminectomy (low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: bilateral laminotomy changes VAS leg (0 to 10) Bilateral laminotomy compared with conventional… compared with conventional laminectomy (very low certainty).
Summary of findings: bilateral laminotomy showed no clear difference in VAS back (0 to 10) Unilateral laminotomy compared with conventional… compared with conventional laminectomy (low certainty).
Summary of findings: bilateral laminotomy may leads to lower incidence of postoperative instability compared with conventional laminectomy (low certainty).
Summary of findings: bilateral laminotomy showed no clear difference in incidence of perioperative complications compared with conventional laminectomy (low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: unilateral laminotomy changes VAS back (0 to 10) Unilateral laminotomy compared with conventional… compared with conventional laminectomy (very low certainty).
Summary of findings: unilateral laminotomy showed no clear difference in incidence of postoperative instability compared with conventional laminectomy (low certainty).