Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

50 questions · 51 findings · 10 reviews · Headline outcomes only

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 8 · 15.7%GRADE not reported 4 · 7.8%Very low 24 · 47.1%Low 12 · 23.5%Moderate 3 · 5.9%High 0 · 0%

Closest answers

The findings closest to your search, judged one by one by TypeSafe's Jev model.

Direct match · question page
- ORAL FLUPHENAZINE vs PLACEBO · Adverse effects: Extrapyramidal effects (rigidity) ‐ short termInstances of rigidity
  Fluphenazine (oral) versus placebo for schizophrenia 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 3.54 [1.76, 7.14]
  2 studies · 227 participants
  Moderate
Direct match · question page
- HALOPERIDOL vs OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: d. LOXAPINE · Adverse effects: Specific ‐ rigidity between 0‐3 days (IM phase)
  Haloperidol for psychosis‐induced aggression or agitation (rapid tranquillisation) 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.88 [0.65, 1.19]
  1 study · 35 participants
  Very low
Direct match · question page
- Rigid dressings vs soft dressings · Wound healing
  Rigid dressings versus soft dressings for transtibial amputations 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 56 participants
  Very low
Direct match · question page
- Rigid vs elastic brace (randomized controlled trial) · Pulmonary disorders, disability, back pain, psychological issues, and cosmetic issues subjective or objective
  Braces for idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  0 studies · 0 participants
  GRADE not reported
Direct match · question page
- Rigid vs elastic brace (randomized controlled trial) · Quality of life
  Braces for idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  0 studies · 0 participants
  GRADE not reported

Rigid vs elastic brace (randomized controlled trial)

Quality of life · adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis

1 finding from 1 review

Braces for idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
0 studies · 0 participants
GRADE not reported

Rigid vs elastic brace (randomized controlled trial)

Risk of success curves remaining below 50° · adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis

Rigid may leads to higher risk of success curves remaining below 50° compared with elastic brace (randomized controlled trial) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Braces for idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.4 [1.03, 1.89]
1 study · 43 participants
Low

Rigid vs elastic brace (randomized controlled trial)

Risk for at least one adverse event per patient · adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis

1 finding from 1 review

Braces for idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
0 studies · 0 participants
GRADE not reported

Rigid vs elastic brace (randomized controlled trial)

Pulmonary disorders, disability, back pain, psychological issues, and cosmetic issues subjective or objective · adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis

1 finding from 1 review

Braces for idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
0 studies · 0 participants
GRADE not reported

Rigid dressings vs soft dressings

Wound healing · people who had undergone transtibial amputations

1 finding from 1 review

Rigid dressings versus soft dressings for transtibial amputations 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 56 participants
Very low

Rigid dressings vs soft dressings

Adverse events · people who had undergone transtibial amputations

It is very uncertain whether rigid dressings changes adverse events compared with soft dressings (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Rigid dressings versus soft dressings for transtibial amputations 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.65 [0.32, 1.32]
6 studies · 336 participants
Very low

Rigid dressings vs soft dressings

Physical function ‐ Time from amputation to walking (days) · people who had undergone transtibial amputations

1 finding from 1 review

Rigid dressings versus soft dressings for transtibial amputations 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 56 participants
Very low

Rigid dressings vs soft dressings

Length of hospital stay · people who had undergone transtibial amputations

1 finding from 1 review

Rigid dressings versus soft dressings for transtibial amputations 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 56 participants
Very low

Rigid dressings vs soft dressings

Comfort · people who had undergone transtibial amputations

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Rigid dressings versus soft dressings for transtibial amputations 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Rigid dressings vs soft dressings

Quality of life · people who had undergone transtibial amputations

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Rigid dressings versus soft dressings for transtibial amputations 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Rigid dressings vs soft dressings

Costs · people who had undergone transtibial amputations

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Rigid dressings versus soft dressings for transtibial amputations 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Intervention not reported

Rigid gas‐permeable contact lenses · children with progressive myopia (26 studies, 4949 participants in the analysis) Interventions: optical and pharmacological Comparator:…

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for myopia control in children: a living systematic review and network meta‐analysis 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 154 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

Rigid gas‐permeable contact lenses · children with progressive myopia (36 studies, 6263 participants) in the analysis Interventions: optical and pharmacological Comparator:…

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for myopia control in children: a living systematic review and network meta‐analysis 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 176 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

Rigid gas‐permeable contact lenses · children with progressive myopia (21 studies, 4169 participants in the analysis) Interventions: optical and pharmacological Comparator:…

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for myopia control in children: a living systematic review and network meta‐analysis 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 154 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

Rigid gas‐permeable contact lenses · children with progressive myopia (38 studies, 6525 participants in analyses) Interventions: optical and pharmacological Comparator:…

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for myopia control in children: a living systematic review and network meta‐analysis 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 178 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

Rigid gas permeable contact lenses vs spectacles or soft contact lenses · children with myopia (nearsightedness)

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions to slow progression of myopia in children 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 420 participants
Very low

FLUPHENAZINE (ORAL) vs placebo

Adverse effects: extrapyramidal adverse effectsParkinsonism (rigidity) short term (< 3 months) Clinical diagnoses · patients with schizophrenia

ORAL FLUPHENAZINE probably leads to higher adverse effects: Extrapyramidal effects (rigidity) ‐ short… compared with PLACEBO (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Fluphenazine (oral) versus placebo for schizophrenia 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 3.54 [1.76, 7.14]
2 studies · 227 participants
Moderate

HALOPERIDOL vs COMBINATIONS: b. HALOPERIDOL + LORAZEPAM

Adverse effects: Specific ‐ hypertonia/rigidity (only reported if occurred in ≥9%) during 24 hours · patients with psychosis‐induced aggression or agitation

It is very uncertain whether HALOPERIDOL changes adverse effects: Specific ‐ hypertonia/rigidity (only reported if… compared with COMBINATIONS: b. HALOPERIDOL + LORAZEPAM (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Haloperidol for psychosis‐induced aggression or agitation (rapid tranquillisation) 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 2.74 [0.3, 25.05]
1 study · 67 participants
Very low

HALOPERIDOL vs OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: d. LOXAPINE

Adverse effects: Specific ‐ rigidity between 0‐3 days (IM phase) · patients to psychosis‐induced aggression or agitation

It is very uncertain whether HALOPERIDOL changes adverse effects: Specific ‐ rigidity between 0‐3 days (IM phase) compared with OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: d. LOXAPINE (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Haloperidol for psychosis‐induced aggression or agitation (rapid tranquillisation) 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.88 [0.65, 1.19]
1 study · 35 participants
Very low

HALOPERIDOL vs lorazepam

Adverse effects: Specific ‐ hypertonia/rigidity (only reported if occurred in ≥9%) during 24 hours · patients with psychosis‐induced aggression or agitation

It is very uncertain whether HALOPERIDOL changes adverse effects: specific ‐ hypertonia/rigidity (only reported if… compared with BENZODIAZEPINE: b. LORAZEPAM (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Haloperidol for psychosis‐induced aggression or agitation (rapid tranquillisation) 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 6.22 [0.33, 115.91]
1 study · 66 participants
Very low