Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

173 questions · 173 findings · 16 reviews · Hepato-Biliary · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 15 · 8.7%GRADE not reported 4 · 2.3%Very low 100 · 57.8%Low 42 · 24.3%Moderate 11 · 6.4%High 1 · 0.6%

Closest answers

The findings closest to your search, judged one by one by TypeSafe's Jev model.

Band ligation vs no intervention or a sham procedure

Oesophageal variceal bleeding · children with portal hypertension and large oesophageal varices, without previous gastrointestinal bleeding or beta‐blocker treatment

It is very uncertain whether band ligation changes oesophageal variceal bleeding compared with sham or no intervention (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Variceal band ligation(5 RCTs, 372 participants) · people with liver cirrhosis and oesophageal varices with no history of bleeding

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes variceal band ligation(5 RCTs, 372 participants) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Variceal band ligation(7 RCTs, 728 participants) · people with liver cirrhosis and oesophageal varices with no history of bleeding

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes variceal band ligation(7 RCTs, 728 participants) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Variceal band ligation(5 RCTs, 380 participants) · people with liver cirrhosis and oesophageal varices with no history of bleeding

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes variceal band ligation(5 RCTs, 380 participants) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Variceal band ligation(3 RCTs, 330 participants) · people with liver cirrhosis and oesophageal varices with no history of bleeding

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes variceal band ligation(3 RCTs, 330 participants) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Variceal band ligation(9 RCTs, 879 participants) · people with liver cirrhosis and oesophageal varices with no history of bleeding

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes variceal band ligation(9 RCTs, 879 participants) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Beta‐blockers + variceal band ligation(1 RCT, 173 participants) · people with liver cirrhosis and oesophageal varices with no history of bleeding

The intervention may leads to lower beta‐blockers + variceal band ligation(1 RCT, 173 participants) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Variceal band ligation(17 RCTs, 1640 participants) · people with liver cirrhosis and oesophageal varices with no history of bleeding

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes variceal band ligation(17 RCTs, 1640 participants) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Beta‐blockers + variceal band ligation(2 RCTs, 313 participants) · people with liver cirrhosis and oesophageal varices with no history of bleeding

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes beta‐blockers + variceal band ligation(2 RCTs, 313 participants) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Beta‐blockers plus Nitrates plus Variceal band ligation(No direct RCT) · people with liver cirrhosis and previous oesophageal variceal bleeding

The intervention showed no clear difference in beta‐blockers plus Nitrates plus Variceal band ligation(No direct RCT) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Beta‐blockers plus Variceal band ligation(No direct RCT) · people with liver cirrhosis and previous oesophageal variceal bleeding

The intervention showed no clear difference in beta‐blockers plus Variceal band ligation(No direct RCT) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review